|
|
ADVANCING
YOUR PRACTICE
Is low back
pain getting on your nerves?
By Yvonne D’Arcy,
CRNP, CNS, MS
Low back pain is a very common patient
complaint. The back is one of the most integral structures of
the body, providing support for muscles and tendons while protecting
the spinal cord. Because it’s the foundation of the body's
support, it’s subject to wear and tear from overuse, incorrect
use, disease, the aging process, and obesity. Any of these can
cause deterioration of the vertebral bodies and disks, resulting
in low back pain.
A 2002 study reported that 26% of
respondents experienced low back pain during a 3-month period.1
Nonspecific low back pain is the fifth most common reason for
healthcare provider visits in the United States.2 It
isn’t only causes pain and suffering for patients, but depletes
healthcare resources. Correspondingly, the costs of time lost
from work and disability reach into the millions of dollars. Proper
treatment of back pain can include medication, exercise, or even
surgery.
Patients at risk
The pain and disability of low back pain are the most common reasons
patients seek healthcare.3 The condition can be caused
by a number of factors, including arthritis, aging, normal wear
and tear, degeneration, arthritic bone spurs, structural damage,
or a malignancy.4 Risk factors that predispose patients
to low back pain include the following:
- poor physical condition without
a regular exercise regimen
- age over 55 years
- lifting heavy loads or engaging
in daily hard physical labor
- obesity
- reduced spinal canal dimensions
(spinal stenosis)
- lower socioeconomic status (less
access to healthcare).4-6
Workers who sit at desks for long
periods of time or stand all day may find that low back pain can
be a life-altering condition. Quality of life is heavily affected
by chronic low back pain, as pain may interfere with the ability
to work, sleep, and maintain relationships.
As the U.S. population ages, the
prevalence of low back pain resulting from degenerative changes
seen in these patients will increase. There are 89 million baby
boomers who are at risk for degenerative disk disease (DDD).7
A high prevalence of arthritis will contribute to a large number
of patients with low back pain from facet disease and bone spurs.
The spine and common spinal
conditions
The spine consists of vertebral bodies and disks. The vertebrae
are divided into three major sections: cervical, thoracic, and
lumbar. There are seven cervical vertebrae, identified as C1 through
C7; 12 thoracic vertebrae, identified as T1 through T12; and five
lumbar vertebrae, identified as L1 through L5.
Below the lumbar vertebrae are the
sacrum, consisting of five fused vertebrae, and the coccyx with
four fused vertebrae.8 The spine has normal curvatures
at the cervical and lumbar area. Proper posture maintains spinal
alignment and can decrease the possibility of low back pain. The
vertebral body has a central canal for the spinal cord and transverse
processes where the spinal nerve roots are located.
Each vertebra has a vertebral body
that’s separated from the adjacent vertebra by a soft, fluid-filled
gelatinous disk.8 This disk acts as a cushion for mechanical
stress and gives the spine its flexibility. It also maintains
support and posture. Each disk is surrounded by a fibrous envelope,
known as the annulus, that consists of 12 concentric layers of
fibrous tissue. This tissue helps secure the disk in place.
The aging process has an acute effect
on these disks. By age 20, the vascularity of each disk decreases,
and by age 30, the desiccation of the disk can cause fissures
in the vertebral body endplates. This leads to DDD, which isn’t
so much a disease, but part of the aging process.7
As degenerative changes take place and each disk becomes less
supple, compression can cause the disk to rupture through the
annulus, resulting in a herniated disk. This can be extremely
painful since the nerve root can be impinged leading to radiculopathy.6
Patients with DDD develop vertebral osteophytes; this condition
is called spondylosis.7 The disk becomes flatter, cracks
develop, and the vertebra develop roughened edges where osteophytes
(bone spur type formations) form. It can also affect the facets
of the spine and develop into facet disease.
Two other spinal conditions can cause
low back pain. Spondylolysis is a defect in the vertebral arch
caused by mechanical stress. This injury is found in children
who participate in gymnastics and other sports, such as wrestling
or football, where hyperextension of the spinal body is possible.7
The damage in the posterior part of the vertebra causes the vertebral
body to become malpositioned, generally in the lumbar spine. Because
of the malpositioning, the patient will present with constant
low back pain—there may also be motor or sensory loss at
L4-5 and S1. Spondylolisthesis is a subluxation of the lumbar
vertebrae where one vertebra overrides the lower vertebra. It
can present with severe pain and radicular symptoms, bowel or
bladder dysfunction, and weakness in the lower extremities.
Older patients with osteoporosis
may experience vertebral compression fractures. These compression
fractures are extremely painful as the nerve root of the vertebral
body is compressed. Osteoporosis causes the vertebral bone to
become porous and prone to fracture. Older patients also experience
desiccation of the vertebral disks, which destroys the cushioning
function.
It’s estimated that 95% of
the population will have DDD by age 50.7 Patients with DDD present
with deep midline low back pain that can radiate to buttocks or
thighs. There may be motor weakness, sensory changes, absent or
diminished reflexes, and, in more severe cases, bowel or bladder
dysfunction.8 Patients with spinal stenosis and herniated
disks account for 3% to 4% of low back pain patients; cancer,
0.7%; and compression fractures, 4%.2
Diagnosing low back pain
The American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society
have developed a joint guideline for diagnosing and treating low
back pain.2 The first guideline recommendation requires a complete
focused history and physical exam. A focused history and physical
exam can indicate the frequency of symptoms, location and duration
of the pain, history of the pain, and prior treatment. Information
about any concurrent infection or neurologic symptoms such as
numbness or muscle weakness should also be investigated.
The physical exam should include
the straight leg raise to determine if a disk is herniated. Since
most herniated disks occur in the lumbar spine, this diagnostic
tool, along with a neurologic exam that includes great toe and
foot dorsiflexion, plantar dorsiflexion, and ankle reflexes, can
identify the area of pain. Practitioners should look for the patient
to experience pain when the leg is at a 30 to 70 degree increase,
as that range affects the nerve roots.2
This information can be used to categorize
patients in one of the following groups: nonspecific low back
pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal
stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another spinal
cause.2 Practitioners should also assess for psychosocial risk
factors (for example, depression, lack of coping skills, anxiety
disorder, and substance abuse disorder) that could predict the
risk for chronic disabling back pain. This assessment is more
predictive of the outcome of treatment than the physical exam
or the pain severity or duration.
The second recommendation states
that clinicians should try to avoid imaging or other diagnostic
tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain.2 Rationale for
this recommendation includes the exposure of patients to unnecessary
radiation in the lumbar and lower abdominal area of the body.
The use of plain radiography and advanced imaging with computerized
tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have not been
associated with improved patient outcomes. For the majority of
patients with nonspecific back pain, the use of imaging creates
increased exposure to radiation, increased cost of treatment,
and does not positively affect treatment outcome.
The third recommendation indicates
instances where imaging should be used.2 Patients who have severe
or progressive neurologic deficits or those in which serious underlying
conditions are suspected should have diagnostic imaging and testing.
Conditions that merit immediate imaging include cancer with suspected
cord compression, vertebral infection, and cauda equina syndrome.
MRI is preferred over CT because it allows better visualization
of the spinal structures. MRI can detect annular tears and disk
fragments, and is helpful in identifying cancer and infection.
The fourth recommendation states
that those who present with persistent low back pain and signs
and symptoms of radiculopathy or suspected spinal stenosis should
be evaluated using an MRI, the preferred imaging study, or CT
only if the patient is a candidate for surgery or epidural steroid
injection.2
In addition to diagnosing the physical
injury, practitioners should be aware that depression is common
in patients with chronic pain, and the rate of suicide in patients
with chronic pain is twice the rate of patients without pain.9
Practitioners should assess patients' moods at each visit, and
explain to them that depression is not uncommon for those with
chronic pain.
Pharmacologic treatment options
Acute low back pain generally resolves within 6 to 12 weeks, regardless
of treatment.10 The 15% of patients with acute low
back pain who don’t improve within that time period are
considered to have chronic low back pain.3 Treatment approaches
differ, depending on the severity of back pain.
Medications are the first line of
pain management for most patients, but the challenge is: Which
medication and for how long? In a recent study, 80% of primary
care patients who complained of low back pain were prescribed
at least one medication at the initial office visit; more than
one-third were prescribed two or more.11
- Acetaminophen.
One of the most common medications patients use at home and
that’s recommended by clinicians is acetaminophen. It
has minimal risk when taken in dosages lower than the recommended
adult maximum dose of 4,000 mg/day. Doses of 4,000 mg/day can
result in asymptomatic elevations of liver function tests even
in healthy adults, but the risk profile to these increases has
not been clearly identified.11 Even though acetaminophen is
less effective than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),
it’s still worth considering as a firstline option because
of its low cost and low risk profile.
- NSAIDs.
There are two different types of NSAIDs: NSAIDs that affect
both COX 1 and COX 2 prostaglandin production and COX 2 medication
that’s COX 2 selective and doesn;t affect the COX 1 prostaglandins
that protect the stomach lining. The COX 2 medications are prescription-only,
but nonselective NSAIDs are available over the counter.
The risk-benefit profile is a concern
when using NSAIDs to treat low back pain. Both types of NSAIDs
can increase cardiovascular risks and renovascular events. Nonselective
NSAIDs have an increased risk of ulceration and gastrointestinal
(GI) bleeding (using aspirin with NSAIDs can increase the risk
for GI bleeding).5 NSAIDs should be prescribed at the
lowest dose for the shortest period of time.2
- Opioid analgesics.
The third recommendation for medication is an opioid analgesic
or tramadol. These medications should be prescribed for patients
who have failed to obtain relief with acetaminophen or NSAIDs.
Pain should be severe or disabling before opioids are considered
for treatment.3 In the short term, they may be efficacious,
but long-term benefit is less clear.12 The incidence
of substance abuse is high, with a finding of aberrant medication
disorder occurring in up to 24% of patients.12 In a study of
800 patients treated in primary care practices for chronic pain
and prescribed opioids, the addiction rate was about 4% for
patients who had been exposed to opioids or had a history of
substance abuse.13
Another unfortunate occurrence is
the development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. This condition
is an atypical hyperalgesic state where pain severity is increased
dramatically unrelated to the original pain stimulus.14
The syndrome is thought to be caused by long-term use of opioids
that create pain generation in the central nervous system and
no longer require nociceptive input to create pain.
- Other medications.
Other medications can be used alone or in conjunction with primary
pain management regimens. These include antidepressants, antiseizure
medications, muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines, and steroids.
Nonpharmacologic interventions
When patients don’t show improvement with standard treatment,
evidence-based nonpharmacologic therapies should be added to the
medication regimen. Acute low back pain, which has been present
for less than 4 weeks, may benefit from spinal manipulation or
superficial heat. Exercise therapy, both supervised and at-home
regimens, hasn’t proved effective for acute low back pain.2
Subacute low back pain, which has
persisted between 4 and 8 weeks, may benefit from interdisciplinary
rehabilitation that includes a physician, NP, and nurses; physical
therapy; psychological, social, and vocational intervention; or
cognitive behavioral therapy. Chronic low back may benefit from
acupuncture; exercise prescribed by a physical therapist, massage,
or yoga; progressive relaxation in which the patient relaxes various
areas of the body, from head to toe in sequence; spinal manipulation;
and interdisciplinary rehabilitation that uses many different
disciplines such as nursing, medical, physical therapy, psychology,
etc.2, 15-17
Surgical options for treating vertebral
fractures include vertebroplasty, which repairs and strengthens
the vertebra; and kyphoplasty, which repairs the vertebra and
corrects the curvature of the spine. In a review of vertebroplasty
and kyphoplasty, 85% of the patients who underwent vertebroplasty
and 92% of patients who underwent kyphoplasty reported good pain
relief with the procedure.18
There’s conflicting and insufficient
evidence related to the use of epidural or other injections for
relieving low back pain.19 Prolotherapy, the injection
of irritant solutions into weakened back muscles, doesn’t
have evidence to support its use alone; however, when added to
a comprehensive regimen of rehabilitation, the injections were
more effective than control injections.20
Educating patients
Discuss medication options with patients carefully. Many patients
with chronic pain rely only on medication to manage pain. It’s
important to see medication as a part of the treatment regimen
rather than the only option. All patients with chronic low back
pain should be encouraged to use a multimodal approach to managing
their condition.
In the acute phase, remaining active,
using heat, and medication, such as acetaminophen and NSAIDs,
will produce the best outcome. If the pain persists, a rehabilitation
program and relaxation can provide benefit.
For chronic pain, the combination
of medication and complementary techniques provide the best outcome.
If pain is severe or disabling, opioids may be an option. Yoga
and exercise can help increase flexibility in tense muscles. Using
different types of exercise therapy can be helpful, such as exercise
classes, swimming, or water therapies. Teaching patients to use
relaxation techniques can help them conquer feelings of helplessness
and decrease stress.
Encourage patients to stay as active
as possible, and help them choose pain management that fits their
lifestyle. For example, yoga and massage may not be realistic
options for all patients. Relaxation, stress relief, and meditation
can help build useful coping skills.
References
1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit
rates: estimates for U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine.
2006;31(23):2724–2727.
2. Chou R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a
joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of
Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med.
2007;147(7):478–491.
3. Von Korff M, Saunders K. The course of back pain in primary
care. Spine. 1996;21:2833–2837.
4. D'Arcy Y. Pain Management: Evidence-Based Tools and Techniques
for Nursing Professionals. Marblehead, MA: HcPro; 2007.
5. Dorsi MJ, Belzberg AJ. Low back pain. In: Wallace MS, Staats
P, eds. Pain Medicine & Management. New York: McGraw-Hill;
2005.
6. D'Arcy Y. Low back pain relief. Nurse Pract. 2006;31(4):17–25.
7. Lower S. Oh my aching back. Paper presented at: Nursing 2008
Symposium Conference; March 2008; Las Vegas, NV.
8. Smeltzer S, et al. Textbook of Medical Surgical Nursing.
Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;
2008.
9. Tang NK, Crane C. Suicidality in chronic pain: a review of
prevalence, risk factors, and psychological links. Psychol
Med. 2006;36(5):575–586.
10. Hagan KB, Hilde G, Jamtveldt G, et al. Bed rest for acute
low back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD001254.
11. Chou R, Huffman L. Medications for acute and chronic low back
pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American
College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern
Med. 2007;147(7):505–514.
12. Martell B, O'Connor P, Kerns R, et al. Systematic review:
opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy,
and association with addiction. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(2):116–117.
13. Flemming M, Balousek S, Klessig C, et al. Substance abuse
disorders in primary care sample receiving daily opioid therapy.
J Pain. 2007;8(7):573582.
14. DuPen A, Shen D, Ersek M. Mechanisms of opioid-induced tolerance
and hyperalgesia. Pain Manag Nurs. 2007;8(3):113121.
15. Chou R, Huffman L. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and
chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American
Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice
guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):492–504.
16. Khadlikar A, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
(TENS) for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2005;(3):CD003008.
17. Manheimer E, et al. Meta-analysis: acupuncture for low back
pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005:142(8):651–663.
18. Hulme P, Krebs J, Fergusson S, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty:
a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine. 2006;31(17):1983–2001.
19. Marcus A. APS Guidelines for low back pain show little love
for interventional therapies. Pain Medicine News. 2008;6(6).
20. Yelland M, et al. Prolotherapy injections for chronic low
back pain: a systematic review. Spine. 2004;29(1):21262133.
Source: Nurse Practitioner.
May 2009.
|