Evidence-Based Practice Network

Show Me The Evidence

The Blog of Lippincott's Evidence-Based Practice Network


Central Venous Pressure Monitoring: What's the Evidence?
I read with interest the article "Central Venous Pressure Monitoring: What's the Evidence", that was published in the January issue of the American Journal of Nursing (AJN). AJN is running a series called Critical Analysis Critical Care, which will appraise the evidence regarding common critical care practices. So much of what we do in nursing is not based on evidence, rather based on how we have always done things in practice or based on research that was not credible.

This article looks at the evidence behind using central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring alone to guide treatment decisions for patients. According to the article, a 2008 systematic review by Marik and colleagues concluded that CVP is not an accurate indicator of intravasuclar volume, nor is it an accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness-that is, whether a patient will respond to a fluid bolus with an increase in stroke volume (Marik, P., 2008). The authors of the AJN article critically appraised the evidence and determined:
  • The relationship between intravascular volume and CVP is a weak relationship and clinicians should not use CVP to estimate a patient's intravascular volume.
  • The absolute CVP value or a change in CVP should not be used to predict a change in the stroke volume or cardiac index.
  • There is not an absolute CVP value that can be used to determine what the next step of treatment should be, either a fluid bolus or the use of a vasoactive medication (Kupchik, N. & Bridges, E., 2012).
What does the evidence tell us? It tells us we can not base treatment decisions on one hemodynamic indice. Rather, when making treatment decisions, the clinician needs to look at the entire hemodynamic picture including heart rate, BP, MAP, and urine output for example, when determining what is the best treatment option for the patient.

References:
Kupchik, N. & Bridges, E., 2012. Central venous pressure monitoring: what's the evidence? American Journal of Nursing. 112 (1).

Marik, P. et al. 2008. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 134(1).


Anne Dabrow Woods MSN RN CRNP
Chief Nurse and Publisher

Posted by Anne Dabrow Woods on 1/11/2012 10:08:17 AM with 1 comments

Trackback URL: http://www.nursingcenter.com/evidencebasedpracticenetwork/trackback/8898a9ef-c2f1-465b-923a-258ac178ce73/Central-Venous-Pressure-Monitoring-What-s-the-Evidence.aspx?culture=en-US

Comments
Dr. Navarrete
me interesa el articulo completo
4/12/2012 12:51:06 AM

Leave comment Subscribe



 Security code

Latest blog comments

2/18/2013
dhartz
Recently we went to solid color uniforms for all staff depe...

12/20/2012
rn nurse
This blog is very nice. i like it. please keep it up.

9/19/2012
Judy
Great article and your blog template is so cool. This is a...

5/21/2012
Louise Malbon-Reddix
Clearly,the patient's comfort is to be given priority h...

5/3/2012
Gayla Cauldwell
Treating physiologic response and patient specific response...

4/29/2012
Kate McGuigan
Hi, Thanks for this. I found this really helpful for an...

4/28/2012
hublot replica
I think the information you provide is very useful for me, ...

4/23/2012
Bulk sms
This post is really something special and more information ...

4/12/2012
Dr. Navarrete
me interesa el articulo completo

3/22/2012
Lisa Bonsall
Hi Catherine - thank your for your comment! Certification d...

|< <  1 2 3   > >|

About your comments

We welcome comments, discussion, curiosity, and debate. Let us know about your nursing lives and personal experiences. We reserve the right to moderate comments that are intended to sell something or that are inappropriate or hostile.

Disclaimer

Views expressed on this blog are solely those of the authors or persons quoted. They do not necessarily reflect Lippincott's NursingCenter.com's views or those of Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.