Abstract
A nutrition intervention was evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data included participant evaluations using a Likert scale. Qualitative data included structured observations and a focus group with educators. Quantitative data were positive, but did not provide adequate context to identify which components of the intervention contributed to the positive evaluation. Structured observation revealed that educators created a relaxed learning environment by asking nonacademic questions. Participants responded by asking factual questions and giving application responses. The focus group supported structured observations; educators reported that a safe learning environment, interactive experiences, and group support were key to intervention success. Quantitative evaluation indicated a successful intervention; qualitative evaluation added contextual elements.