View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
By State Requirement
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
WEDNESDAY, March 18 (HealthDay News) -- A widely used hospital quality measure that compares mortality rates and takes into account the mix of cases is inaccurate and may increase the bias that case mix adjustment is intended to decrease, according to research published March 18 in BMJ Online First.
Mohammed A. Mohammed, Ph.D., from the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom, and colleagues retrospectively compared observed hospital deaths with deaths predicted by the Dr. Foster Intelligence case mix method, which is used to derive standardized mortality ratios for hospitals in England and has been adopted internationally to assess hospital quality. The researchers used data from 286,282 hospital admissions.
The investigators found systemic differences in the associations between hospital mortality rates and several of the case mix adjustment variables, particularly the Charlson (comorbidity) index and emergency admission. The interaction effects of the two variables could be explained by differences in clinical coding and admission practices across hospitals.
"These findings undermine the credibility of standardized mortality ratios and indicate that their role in labeling hospitals as good or bad is unjustified," write the authors of an accompanying editorial.
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top