View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
By State Requirement
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
MONDAY, July 27 (HealthDay News) -- Updated guidelines have been developed to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, according to an article published online July 21 in PLoS Medicine.
David Moher, Ph.D., from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and colleagues updated the previous QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) Statement developed in 1996 and published in 1999, and developed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement.
The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist, which includes items determined to be essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. The authors note that the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document has an explanation of the meaning and rationale for each checklist item, an example of good reporting, and references when possible. The Statement also includes a four-phase flow diagram going through the different phases of producing a systematic review.
"The overall aim of PRISMA is to help ensure the clarity and transparency of reporting of systematic reviews, and recent data indicate that this reporting guidance is much needed," Moher and colleagues write. "However, the PRISMA checklist is not a quality assessment instrument to gauge the quality of a systematic review."
Full Text - Article
Full Text - Explanation & Elaboration
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top