View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
By State Requirement
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
WEDNESDAY, Oct. 14 (HealthDay News) -- In the treatment of children with pulled elbow, limited evidence suggests that pronation may be a more effective and less painful manipulative intervention than the standard supination method, according to an review published online Oct. 7 in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Marjolein Krul, M.D., of Erasmus MC University Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands, and colleagues reviewed three trials including 313 patients under the age of 7 years which compared manipulation by pronation versus supination.
The researchers faulted all three trials for low methodological quality due to incomplete reporting and potential bias resulting from a lack of assessor blinding. Based on the evidence, they found that pronation had a lower risk of treatment failure than supination. Pain perception was reported for two of three trials, but data was unavailable for pooling. However, pronation was associated with lower pain perception than supination in the two studies.
"There is limited evidence from three small low-quality trials that the pronation method might be more effective and less painful than the supination method for manipulating pulled elbow in young children. However, only a small difference in effectiveness was found," the authors conclude. "We recommend that a high quality randomized trial be performed to strengthen the evidence."
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top