Tight BP Control May Not Benefit Patients With Diabetes, CAD

Groups with tight, moderate control of systolic BP have similar rate of adverse outcomes
By Monica Smith
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, July 6 (HealthDay News) -- Individuals with diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) do not appear to have improved cardiovascular outcomes when they achieve tight control of systolic blood pressure as opposed to usual control, according to research published in the July 7 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff, of the University of Florida in Gainesville, and colleagues performed a subgroup analysis on 6,400 subjects over the age of 50 with diabetes and CAD, who had varying degrees of control over their systolic blood pressure, to determine an association between blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in this patient population. The subjects were participants in the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study (INVEST).

In 16,893 patient-years of follow-up, the researchers found that death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke occurred in 286 subjects (12.7 percent) who achieved tight systolic blood pressure (under 130 mm Hg), 249 subjects (12.6 percent) who maintained usual systolic blood pressure (130 to less than 140 mm Hg), and 431 subjects (19.8 percent) who had uncontrolled blood pressure (140 mm Hg or higher). With extended follow-up, the tight-control group had an all-cause mortality risk of 22.8 percent, compared with 21.8 in the usual-control group.

"At this time, there is no compelling evidence to indicate that lowering systolic blood pressure below 130 mm Hg is beneficial for patients with diabetes; thus, emphasis should be placed on maintaining systolic blood pressure between 130 and 139 mm Hg while focusing on weight loss, healthful eating, and other manifestations of cardiovascular morbidity to further reduce long-term cardiovascular risk," the authors conclude.

Abbott Laboratories provided funding for INVEST. Four authors disclosed financial relationships with Abbott and other pharmaceutical and/or medical device companies.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2010 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Powered by

jQuery UI Accordion - Default functionality

For life-long learning and continuing professional development, come to Lippincott's NursingCenter.

Nursing Jobs Plus
Featured Jobs
Recommended CE Articles

Blunt Chest Trauma
Journal of Trauma Nursing, November/December 2014
Expires: 12/31/2016 CE:2 $21.95


The School Age Child with Congenital Heart Disease
MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, January/February 2015
Expires: 2/28/2017 CE:2.5 $24.95


Understanding multiple myeloma
Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, January/February 2015
Expires: 2/28/2017 CE:2 $21.95


More CE Articles

Subscribe to Recommended CE

Recommended Nursing Articles

Comprehensive Care: Looking Beyond the Presenting Problem
Journal of Christian Nursing, January/March 2015
Free access will expire on March 2, 2015.


Pain and Alzheimer dementia: A largely unrecognized problem
Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, January/February 2015
Free access will expire on February 16, 2015.


Glycemic control in hospitalized patients
Nursing2015 Critical Care, January 2015
Free access will expire on February 16, 2015.


More Recommended Articles

Subscribe to Recommended Articles

Evidence Based Practice Skin Care Network NursingCenter Quick Links What’s Trending Events