View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
WEDNESDAY, Nov. 3 (HealthDay News) -- Although voluntary efforts by the Australian food industry to reduce sodium in processed foods seem to be paying off, governmental regulation of these efforts may have a 20-fold greater impact, according to research published online Nov. 1 in Heart.
Using proportional multistate life-table modeling of cardiovascular disease and health sector cost outcomes over the lifetime of the Australian population in 2003, Linda J. Cobiac, M.D., of the University of Queensland in Herston, Australia, and colleagues evaluated the population health benefits and cost-effectiveness of dietary salt-reduction interventions used in Australia.
Reductions in the salt content of processed food (mandatory and voluntary) were found to be cost-saving interventions under all modeled scenarios of discounting, costing, and cardiovascular disease risk reversal. Individually-targeted dietary advice was not cost-effective in any of the modeled scenarios, even when targeted to those at high risk of hypertension. The models also showed that population health benefits could be 20 times higher than 2003 levels if some aspects of voluntary food industry salt reduction were made mandatory and government regulated.
"Food manufacturers have a responsibility to make money for their shareholders, but they also have a responsibility to society. If corporate responsibility fails, maybe there is an ethical justification for government to step in and legislate," the authors write.
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top