View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
By State Requirement
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
THURSDAY, July 5 (HealthDay News) -- Bivalent and monovalent oral poliovirus vaccines (OPVs) are similarly effective, but decreases in vaccine coverage in parts of Pakistan and southern Afghanistan are hampering efforts to eradicate poliomyelitis, according to a study published online July 4 in The Lancet.
Kathleen M. O'Reilly, Ph.D., from Imperial College London, and colleagues investigated the reasons behind the increasing incidence of polio in Pakistan and Afghanistan despite program interventions, including the introduction of new vaccines. A matched case-control analysis was performed on a database of 46,977 0- to 14-year-old children with onset of flaccid paralysis from 2001 through 2011. The clinical effectiveness of OPV was estimated by comparing the vaccination history of children with poliomyelitis with that of children with acute flaccid paralysis due to other causes. Vaccine coverage and serotype-specific vaccine-induced population immunity was assessed for children aged 0 to 2 years.
The researchers identified 883 cases of serotype 1 poliomyelitis (710 and 173 in Pakistan and Afghanistan, respectively) and 272 cases of poliomyelitis serotype 3 (216 and 56, respectively). The estimated clinical per-dose effectiveness of trivalent OPV was 12.5 percent against serotype 1 poliomyelitis, compared with 34.5 and 23.4 percent for monovalent and bivalent OPV, respectively, with the bivalent vaccine noninferior to the monovalent vaccine. During 2006 to 2011, vaccination coverage declined in specific areas in Pakistan and southern Afghanistan, resulting in decreased vaccine-induced population immunity to poliovirus serotype 1 and increased incidence of poliomyelitis.
"These results provide an example of the need to tailor immunization programs to epidemiological circumstances, particularly where the goal is eradication," writes the author of an accompanying editorial.
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top