View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
MONDAY, July 9 (HealthDay News) -- Circumcised boys have a significantly lower risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) compared with uncircumcised boys, regardless of the degree of visibility of the urethral meatus, according to a study published online July 9 in CMAJ, the journal of the Canadian Medical Association.
To examine whether the risk of UTI is affected by the degree to which the urethral meatus is visible (phimosis), Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky, M.D.C.M., of the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, and colleagues conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 393 circumcised and uncircumcised boys who visited an emergency department with UTI symptoms.
The researchers found that, among uncircumcised boys, cultures grew from urine samples for 30 percent of those with a completely visible meatus and 23.8 percent with a partially or nonvisible meatus, with an unadjusted odds ratio [OR] for culture growth of 0.73 and an adjusted OR of 0.41. The rate of UTI was significantly lower among circumcised boys (4.8 percent) compared with uncircumcised boys with a completely visible urethral meatus (unadjusted OR, 0.12; adjusted OR, 0.07).
"Our results suggest that uncircumcised boys presenting with clinical symptoms or signs suggesting UTI are at equal risk for UTI irrespective of the visibility of the urethra," the authors write. "Clinicians should continue to use circumcision status alone, not the degree of phimosis, to decide which boys should undergo investigation for UTI."
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top