View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
By State Requirement
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
THURSDAY, Oct. 11 (HealthDay News) -- Collaborative infection control efforts to reduce the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other organisms are likely to obtain better results than hospitals acting alone, according to research published in the October issue of Health Affairs.
Bruce Y. Lee, M.D., M.B.A., of the Public Health and Infectious Diseases Computational and Operations Research group at the University of Pittsburgh, and colleagues conducted a computer simulation of all hospitals in Orange County, Calif., to evaluate whether cooperation on infection control obtains better results than hospitals acting alone.
Based on the computer simulation, the researchers found that each hospital's decision to test all patients at admission for MRSA and utilize specific contact isolation procedures for health care workers when interacting with an infected patient affected not only the MRSA prevalence at that hospital but in all other hospitals in the area.
"Our study shows that coordination of MRSA prevention practices in infection control, even among small groups of hospitals, can benefit all hospitals in a county, even those that do not implement the intervention," the authors write. "The effects of persuading other hospitals in the same county to implement control mechanisms can help hospitals achieve better infection control than they could on their own. The more hospitals that work together, the greater the benefits accrued."
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top