View Entire Collection
By Clinical Topic
Diabetes – Summer 2012
Future of Nursing Initiative
Heart Failure - Fall 2011
Influenza - Winter 2011
Nursing Ethics - Fall 2011
Trauma - Fall 2010
Traumatic Brain Injury - Fall 2010
Fluids & Electrolytes
FRIDAY, March 15 (HealthDay News) -- Robotic surgery is not the only, the best, or the most cost-efficient method for a minimally invasive hysterectomy, according to a statement published March 14 by the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG).
James T. Breeden, M.D., ACOG's president, released a statement to counter some of the aggressive, direct-to-consumer marketing pushing robotic surgery, saying that patients need factual information about all treatment options, including vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies.
ACOG says that expertise with robotic hysterectomies is still limited and, during the learning curve associated with new surgical methodologies, there can be increased complications. Adding the expensive technology for routine surgical care does not improve outcomes, studies have found. Evidence shows that vaginal hysterectomies are the least invasive and least expensive option, with laparoscopic hysterectomies coming in second on both measures. Hospitalizations and recovery times are shorter with both vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies, compared to traditional total abdominal hysterectomies. Robotic surgery is the most expensive option, adding an average of $2,000 per procedure without any clinical benefit, according to a recent study. Despite the expense, in three years, the percentage of hysterectomies performed robotically has increased from 0.5 to 10 percent. If robotic surgery were used for all hysterectomies, roughly one billion dollars of costs would be added to the health care system.
"While there may be some advantages to the use of robotics in complex hysterectomies, especially for cancer operations that require extensive surgery and removal of lymph nodes, studies have shown that adding this expensive technology for routine surgical care does not improve patient outcomes," Breeden said in a statement.
Sign up for our free enewsletters to stay up-to-date in your area of practice - or take a look at an archive of prior issues
Join our CESaver program to earn up to 100 contact hours for only $34.95
Explore a world of online resources
Back to Top