Clinical Rounds

$3.95
Nursing2014
March 2010 
Volume 40  Number 3
Pages 19 - 21
 
  PDF Version Available!

ABSTRACT
To determine whether early postpyloric feeding offers an advantage over gastric feeding in critically ill patients, researchers studied 50 ICU patients on mechanical ventilation receiving postpyloric feeding and 54 receiving gastric feeding. The feeding tubes were placed by bedside ICU nurses who'd been trained to insert postpyloric tubes using a blind insertion technique. Nurses were required to pass a competency exam after completing training.The researchers found these benefits for patients in the gastric group: * a shorter time to initiation of feed * a shorter time to reach goal feed rate * lower average daily energy deficits.Finding no differences in length of stay, ventilator days, or complication rates between the two groups, researchers concluded that postpyloric feeding has no advantage over gastric feeding.Even so, postpyloric tube placement may be indicated for certain patients, such as those who can't tolerate gastric feeding. Placing these tubes endoscopically or under fluoroscopy has a high success rate, but these methods are costly and not always readily available, leading to significant delays in initiation of feeding. The researchers say their study shows that "bedside nursing staff can successfully and safely place postpyloric tubes in the majority of patients, potentially reducing delays in initiation of feeds."Source: White H, Sosnowski K, Tran K, Reeves A, Jones M. A randomized controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R187.New guidelines from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommend using the hemoglobin A1C blood test to diagnose type 2 diabetes and screen for prediabetes. This test has previously been used primarily to monitor blood glucose levels in patients known to have diabetes.Expressed as a percentage, A1C measures average blood glucose levels over 3 months. A normal reading is about 5%. Under the

Purchase Now !

To purchase this item, follow the instructions below. If you’re not already logged in, be sure to enter your login information below to ensure that your item is saved to your File Drawer after you purchase it.

Not a member? Join now for Free!


Cost:$3.95
1) If you're not already logged in, enter your information below to save this item in your File Drawer for future viewing.

User name:


Password


Forgot your user name or password?
2)  If you have a coupon or promotional code, enter it
here.(If not, just click Continue.


Digital Coupon: (optional)

3)  Click Continue to go to the next screen, where
you'll enter your payment details.






jQuery UI Accordion - Default functionality

For life-long learning and continuing professional development, come to Lippincott's NursingCenter.

Nursing Jobs Plus
Featured Jobs
Recommended CE Articles

Debunking Three Rape Myths
Journal of Forensic Nursing, October/December 2014
Expires: 12/31/2016 CE:2.5 $24.95


Drug updates and approvals: 2014 in review
The Nurse Practitioner, 13December 2014
Expires: 12/31/2016 CE:3 $27.95


Can Food Processing Enhance Cancer Protection?
Nutrition Today, September/October 2014
Expires: 10/31/2016 CE:2 $21.95


More CE Articles

Subscribe to Recommended CE

Recommended Nursing Articles Evidence Based Practice Skin Care Network NursingCenter Quick Links What’s Trending Events