Abstract
OVERVIEW: LPNs may be able to help fill some of the gaps caused by the nursing shortage, but little research has been conducted on the demographic characteristics of LPNs, their education and scope of practice, and the demand for their services, all of which vary from state to state. In 2002 and 2003, the authors conducted a comprehensive national study, Supply, Demand, and Use of Licensed Practical Nurses, and have summarized that study's findings in this article. They found that RNs and LPNs are similar in age and tend to have similar numbers of children, but that racial and ethnic minorities, particularly African Americans, and those who are single, widowed, divorced, or separated are better represented among LPNs. Expanding LPN educational programs might draw more people into nursing. Some LPNs would like to become RNs, so expanding LPN-to-RN "ladder" programs could also be beneficial. LPNs can't replace RNs entirely, but they could perform much of the work now performed by RNs. While long-term care facilities already depend heavily on LPNs, hospitals could benefit from employing more LPNs. The authors make several specific policy recommendations to improve the education and employment of LPNs.
Since World War II, each successive nursing shortage in the United States has prompted health care leaders to evaluate the ways in which adequate nursing care can be provided in hospitals and other settings. One question repeatedly asked is How can LPNs be better used? The current shortage is no exception, and nurse executives and hospital administrators have been asking how much nursing care can be performed by LPNs. Although LPNs organized into professional groups as early as 1941, there is little in the literature on the scope of LPNs' practice, the demand for them in health care, and how they can be used efficiently. (For more on the National Association for Practical Nurse Education and Service, go to www.napnes.org/about/about.htm .) This article, based on the findings of a comprehensive national study, Supply, Demand, and Use of Licensed Practical Nurses (authored by the four of us plus Kevin Grumbach, MD, and found online at ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/bhpr/nationalcenter/lpn.pdf ), asks whether the use of LPNs can solve or help to solve the nursing shortage. 1
LPNs-known as LVNs in Texas and California-numbered 596,355 in 2000, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates. 2 The same year, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing reported that there were as many as 902,154 active LPN and LVN licenses in the United States and its territories. 3 Usually LPNs obtain a license after 12 to 18 months of postsecondary education. In contrast, RNs complete two to four years of education before licensure. It's difficult to categorize the work of LPNs in the United States because practice acts and scopes of practice vary substantially by state. LPNs usually work under the supervision of an RN or physician, and their responsibilities typically include basic hygienic and nursing care, measurement of vital signs, and administration of prescribed nonintravenous medications. In some states, LPNs can administer IV fluids that do not contain medication and withdraw blood.
A recent study indicates that outcomes in patients with urinary tract infections, pneumonia, shock, and cardiac arrest are positively associated with increases in RN hours. 4 The substitution of LPNs for RNs is dependent on employers' belief that LPNs' skills are suited to their practice environments, as well as on the adoption of sufficiently permissive scope-of-practice regulations.
We framed our study by asking whether LPNs might be used to address a nursing shortage in several ways, including the following:
* If the population from which LPNs are drawn is different from that of RNs, recruiting LPNs might bring more people into nursing than the recruitment of RNs alone would.
* If, in response to changes in wages, working conditions, and other characteristics, LPNs make different kinds of employment decisions than RNs do, LPNs might be attracted to work when RNs are dissuaded from employment.
* If education programs for LPNs could expand more rapidly than those for RNs because of differences in costs or accreditation regulations, LPNs might be able to enter the labor market more quickly. LPNs also could subsequently pursue RN education.
* If the scope of practice for LPNs is sufficiently broad, they might be able to perform many of the same tasks RNs perform.
Each of these possibilities will be reviewed, followed by assessment of the potential role of LPNs in the current nursing shortage.
METHODS
The national study, sponsored by the Bureau of Health Professions, U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, was a comprehensive look at LPN demographic and employment characteristics, scope of practice, and education in the United States and its territories and was conducted in 2002 and 2003. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the American Hospital Association, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were analyzed. Scope-of-practice information was obtained from each state's board of practical nursing and characterized in terms of its level of restrictiveness and its specificity about various tasks in order to elucidate how practice regulations vary and how they affect the demand for LPNs. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with nursing leaders in four states: California, Iowa, Louisiana, and Massachusetts. Those interviewed included practicing LPNs and RNs, nurse educators, hospital administrators, and representatives from the boards of nursing. Details about these research methods are provided in the report.
FINDINGS
There are some dissimilarities in the groups of people who choose to become either LPNs or RNs. The different educational requirements associated with RN and LPN licensure may be a primary reason for this; LPN education takes less time and is less expensive than RN education.
If RNs and LPNs are drawn from different pools of potential nurses, recruiting LPNs might bring more people into the nursing profession than recruiting RNs alone. To determine whether this possibility is true, we examined data from the 2005 Current Population Survey. 2 Comparisons of the characteristics of LPNs and RNs demonstrated that the LPN workforce had much in common with the RN workforce but also differed in potentially significant ways (see Table 1, page 43).
![]() | Demographic Characteristics of LPNs and RNs |
In 2003 the average age of both LPNs and RNs was 43 years; while men represented a small percentage of both workforces, the percentage of RNs who were male (8.1%) was nearly twice the percentage of LPNs who were male (4.4%).
Racial and ethnic minority groups were better represented in the LPN work-force, almost entirely due to the fact that 20% of the LPN workforce were African American, compared with only 10% of the RN workforce. The percentage of LPNs who were white was 69%, while the percentage of RNs who were was 77%. Well under 10% of LPNs and RNs were either Asian or Hispanic. Efforts to expand the LPN workforce might be particularly successful as the U.S. minority population grows.
Although nearly two-thirds of both LPNs and RNs had children, a higher percentage of LPNs were widowed, divorced, or separated. LPN education might be attractive to this group, because of the relatively short and inexpensive course of study required for licensure.
If LPNs and RNs respond differently to wage levels, working conditions, and other factors, LPNs might be attracted to jobs when RNs are not. Few data are available on the employment decisions of LPNs. The Current Population Survey asked about respondents' occupations; some people who reported "LPN" as their occupation indicated that they weren't working. However, there isn't any completely reliable way to determine how many people who hold an LPN license are not currently working as nurses or are working in another field. Thus, we can study the nursing workforce only to the extent that LPNs and RNs work.
There were similar employment trends among RNs and LPNs-more nurses in each job category were employed in 2003 than in 1984.
However, as seen in Table 2, at right, the work settings of LPNs and RNs differed markedly. While more than 60% of RNs worked in hospitals, only 37% of LPNs did; while 33% of LPNs worked in nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and other personal care settings, only 8% of RNs did.
![]() | Employment Patterns of LPNs and RNs |
Some studies have found that the RN labor supply is relatively unresponsive to wage increases in the short term. 5 We used multivariate regression analyses to examine the characteristics that affected the number of hours LPNs and RNs worked per week, and found that wage increases are associated with more hours of work for LPNs, but not for RNs. 6 Thus, wage growth caused by shortages that result in an increase in the number of hours worked may lead to changes in the mix of nurses available, if LPNs are easier to recruit.
If education programs for LPNs can be started or expanded more rapidly than can programs for RNs because of differences in costs or accreditation regulations, more LPNs will be able to enter the labor market more quickly. Also, LPNs can pursue RN education subsequently, and "career ladder" programs that advance LPNs into RN programs may prove useful in addressing RN shortages.
Since the 1990s, the number of LPN programs has remained relatively stable, but there has been a decline in the number of graduates. Curricular requirements in LPN education programs vary by state and territory. Most states specify the content and number of hours of training, and some states' specifications are more detailed than those of others. Most programs require training in basic nursing skills, such as taking vital signs and collecting other patient data, providing care and comfort, and administering medication. Most states require additional education for those LPNs who plan to practice in areas that require skills not usually taught in a basic LPN course of study, such as IV infusion and IV medication administration.
Our interviews with nurse educators and state boards of nursing did not indicate that it was always easier to start an LPN program than an RN program. LPN programs can be completed more quickly, usually in 12 to 18 months, which results in lower overall costs per LPN graduate. But many college presidents and nursing school deans, recognizing that the shortage of RNs is more severe than that of LPNs, have been more willing to devote additional resources to expanding RN programs.
Most of the LPNs in our focus groups expressed a desire or an intention to return to school to get the RN license, but few were enrolled in RN programs. Insufficient time, the need for an ongoing salary, too few open slots in courses, and family obligations were among the reasons that LPNs cited for not pursuing further education. In some regions, LPNs in long-term care facilities had salaries equal or almost equal to those of hospital RNs. These LPNs tended to be less interested in pursuing an RN license. In regions where there was a substantial gap between RN and LPN salaries, LPNs were more interested in becoming RNs.
Whether LPNs can fill the RN gap depends, at least in part, on the legal scope of LPNs' practice, which varies from state to state and is regulated by state nursing boards and state nursing practice acts. Typically, nurses' scope of practice and educational requirements are specified in state legislation. Most boards then allow for expanded practice-usually in administering IV infusions and IV medications, performing hemodialysis, and supervising other staff-with additional education. In most cases the practice acts declare that the LPN must work under the supervision of an RN, a physician, or in some states, a pharmacist, podiatrist, or other health care professional.
States explicate the work of LPNs in a variety of ways. Some, such as Louisiana, Montana, Maine, and Nevada, have detailed lists of tasks that LPNs can and cannot perform. Other states, such as Georgia, Alaska, Kentucky, and Oklahoma, have "decision trees" to be used as guides for deciding which tasks can be performed by LPNs. Some states, such as Colorado and Nebraska, use the structure of the nursing care plan (goals, assessment, planning, intervention, and evaluation) to detail the work that can be performed by RNs, LPNs, and certified nursing assistants. South Carolina has developed charts that delineate allowable tasks according to system of the body, job category, and experience level within job categories. Neither Michigan nor Texas has defined the scope of LPN or LVN practice or passed a practice act defining it.
In order to better understand the scopes of practice of LPNs, we obtained documentation from virtually every board that regulates the practice of LPNs and LVNs. Our hypothesis was that there is variation in the restrictiveness of the scopes of practice for LPNs, and that this restrictiveness influences the role and flexibility of LPNs in work settings. Our data indicate that there are similarities-such as allowing basic nursing tasks such as hygiene to be performed-in the LPN nurse practice acts across states, but variation in how the states regulate the details of the work of LPNs.
Interviews with leaders of state boards of nursing, LPN educational programs, hospitals, and nursing homes allowed us to compare the actual practice of LPNs with the written regulations. State nursing board leaders were aware of the differences in scope-of-practice regulations across states and didn't find these differences troublesome. They also recognized that employers establish their own internal practice guidelines, which may be more restrictive than the scope of practice allowed by law.
Some hospital and education leaders considered their states' scope of practice to be too restrictive. Nursing home leaders agreed that LPNs are essential to the provision of care in their facilities; the scope of practice of LPNs is well suited to the needs of their patients, who tend to be less acutely ill and more stable. Hospital leaders varied in their willingness to employ LPNs. Most recognized that experienced, capable LPNs could be an asset to a nursing care team but found that the scope of practice of LPNs was too limited to allow for significant employment of LPNs in acute-care settings.
The focus groups revealed that both RNs and LPNs were fairly knowledgeable about the legal scope of practice of LPNs in their state, yet there was wide variation in its interpretation and implementation. Participants' perceptions of the scope of their own practice occasionally differed from state regulations. This discrepancy was usually related to their employers not allowing LPNs to practice to the full extent of their legal scope of practice.
To examine the effect of scope-of-practice regulations on the demand for LPNs, we conducted multivariate regression analyses for LPN employment using national data. 6 Restrictive scope-of-practice laws had a significant negative effect on hospital demand for LPNs. The restrictiveness of the scope of practice also, not surprisingly, had a negative effect, although a weaker one, on demand in long-term care facilities (weaker, perhaps, because long-term care facilities rarely require the tasks, such as IV "push" medication delivery or blood administration, that LPNs are prevented from performing in the more restrictive states).
CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our findings of demographics, education, scope of practice, and demand for LPNs and RNs, we believe LPNs can help address the current nursing shortage in a limited way. New LPNs are drawn from a different demographic pool than RNs are; therefore, expanding LPN education can bring a broader group of people into the nursing profession. In general, it isn't easier to open or expand an LPN program than to open or expand an RN program. Because many LPNs are interested in pursuing RN licenses, nursing educators should increase opportunities for them to do so. LPN-to-RN programs can help LPNs advance into RN jobs, and their success may in turn improve the overall diversity of the nursing workforce. Flexible programs can be implemented to provide RN education to working LPNs in part-time, evening, and weekend schedules. Additionally, a growing number of employers offer scholarships. 7 Expansion of current LPN education programs or creation of new ones is not likely to solve the RN shortage completely, but targeted LPN-to-RN programs can help fill the gap.
Although all nursing leaders and focus group members stated that LPNs could not replace RNs, most acknowledged that much of the work that RNs perform could be performed by LPNs, even though their scope of practice is more limited. There are, of course, differences in the training and skills of the two different groups, just as there are differences among individuals in each occupation. Long-term care institutions could not function without LPNs, and it's likely that LPNs could be used more fully in hospitals. However, even if direct substitution were possible, there's little hope that the current number of LPNs would be able to augment the RN workforce sufficiently to fill the need. More LPNs and RNs are needed.
Based on our findings, we recommend the following:
* Before making changes to LPNs' scope of practice, states should assess whether the evidence indicates that easing practice restrictions would negatively affect patient care.
* Employers should examine how the work of LPNs can be distributed safely and reasonably, so that RNs aren't overwhelmed and LPNs can perform all of the nursing tasks permitted to them under existing scope-of-practice regulations.
* Employers should provide additional compensation to LPNs who complete additional training and obtain certification beyond that required for basic LPN licensure; this would provide educational incentives to LPNs.
* Nurse educators should facilitate the matriculation of LPNs in RN educational programs. More efficient "laddering" of workers from lower-skill to higher-skill health care jobs would benefit both workers and employers and, ultimately, would decrease the total cost of educating nurses.
At present, the LPN workforce is not being used to its fullest capacity. Employers, state boards of nursing, and educators should strive to ensure that all types of licensed nurses are part of the effort to alleviate the nursing shortage.
Novlette Clark
![]() | FIGURE. No caption available. |
Bronx, New York
Age: 39
'We have the touch!! LPNs have the time to slow down and talk, just being there. That's what's needed, the touch.'
In May, AJN 's clinical editor, Karen Roush, interviewed and photographed several students in the LPN program at Putnam-Northern Westchester Board of Cooperative Educational Services in Yorktown Heights, New York. She talked with them during a clinical rotation at Northern Westchester Hospital, in nearby Mount Kisco, about their professional aspirations and why they chose to be LPNs rather than RNs. Roush's photographs and excerpts from her interviews are interspersed throughout this article.
Above, Novlette Clark, a single mother of four children, assists new mother Mary Anne Russo and one-day-old Jaclyn Alexis Russo. Clark wanted to move up from her job as a certified nursing assistant, where earning enough meant working double shifts, leaving little time or energy for her family. "Time and money were really the issues for me," she says of her decision. She started taking courses toward a degree but found the demands overwhelming. The 10-month, full-time LPN program was the best route for her to attain her goals: a career she loves, a better income, and time for her children. She plans on resuming her RN studies in January.
Michelle Grant
![]() | FIGURE. No caption available. |
Bronx, New York
Age: 27
'I came to realize that the LPN deals a lot with clinical and patient care, while the RN does a lot of paperwork and care plans.'
When her mother was dying of cancer, Michelle Grant helped the nurses care for her and was deeply influenced by their skill and dedication. She researched the roles of RNs and LPNs before enrolling in the LPN program at Putnam-Northern Westchester Board of Cooperative Educational Services in New York. Believing that it would give her more direct patient contact, she decided to try the LPN program first. Her student clinical experiences have illuminated the different roles and increased her respect for RNs. "In comparison with the LPN, the RN has a lot of duties to fulfill," she says. "They have to do a little of everything: the paperwork, the patient care, making sure everything is correct. It's a great responsibility!!" She plans on continuing her education to become an RN. "Nurses are in great demand and I'm willing to learn as much about nursing as possible," she says, adding, "but I'm still excited that I get to be an LPN and see what each is about."
Dolores Duffy
![]() | FIGURE. No caption available. |
Croton-on-Hudson, New Yor
Age: 43
'You see an LPN working very hard for much less pay. It just makes sense to go on.'
Dolores Duffy is no stranger to stressful jobs. Despite 20 years as a New York City detective, she was surprised by the demands of nursing school. "I knew I had my work cut out for me," she says, "but I didn't know my whole life had to change." She cites her age and her status as a single mother of three children (ages nine to 15) as the deciding factors in choosing the LPN track over the RN track. "I had various opinions, from 'Try the LPN first' to 'You have to go for the RN,' but basically I made my own decision," she says. She'll continue her nursing studies-whether in an associate's-degree or bachelor's-degree program depends on how many college credits will transfer from courses she took years ago. She sees LPNs as having the advantage of being able to provide more personal care to patients but at a disadvantage when it comes to wages.
James Keane
![]() | FIGURE. No caption available. |
Yorktown, New York
Age: 49
'I thought the LPN was a little lower on the nursing food chain. But you're right in there. It's life and death.'
When James Keane started talking about a career in nursing, after 22 years in law enforcement, his wife said, "Jim, what are you, crazy?" But the nurses he knew, including a sister and a sister-in-law, encouraged him. He'd recently retired from an administrative position at Rikers Island, a prison complex on the East River in New York City. "I enjoyed my years in corrections," he says. "Some guys were waiting for that day to run out the door. But I just want to deal with people again and have some fun with it." For him that means not ending up in a supervisory or administrative role, a move he sees as inevitable for an RN. "I think the LPN has more hands-on contact with patients," he says. In the hospital setting he feels himself a part of a team with RNs, but in the nursing home he feels "distant" from them. He may one day return to school. "It will make me a better nurse," he says. "But for the title of RN? It really doesn't make a big difference to me."
Anshu Dhar
![]() | FIGURE. No caption available. |
Peekskill, New York
Age: 31
'Someone will come in and teach you a skill, but you don't know why you do it.
You don't have that background or education to support what you're doing.'
Ask Anshu Dhar why she pursued an LPN rather than an RN license, and her immediate response is, "Stigma!!" She is from northern India, where nursing has long been regarded as "a messy and low-grade job," although that perception is beginning to change with the increase in technology in nursing care. "I was very scared of the reaction of my family, especially my husband's family, who are still in India," she says. "I said to them, 'Let me start with LPN first and see,' because you need that acceptance from your family." Her family is now "thrilled" about her nursing career, and with their support she plans on entering a master's program for second-degree students (she holds a bachelor's degree in psychology), with a goal of becoming an NP. She regards the LPN role as "more challenging" than that of the RN when it comes to direct care, but she sees RNs as providing a "directional path" for LPNs. "They pave the way with their expertise and education," she says.
REFERENCES
1. Seago JA, et al. Supply, demand, and use of licensed practical nurses. San Francisco: University of California; Nov 2004. ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/bhpr/nationalcenter/lpn.pdf . [Context Link]
2. U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey, outgoing rotations 1979-2005. Santa Monica, CA: Unicon Research; 2005. [Context Link]
3. Crawford L, et al. 2000 licensure and examination statistics. Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing Inc; 2001. http://www.ncsbn.org/pdfs/2000lic_exam_statistics_report_on-line.pdf . [Context Link]
4. Needleman J, et al. Nurse staffing in hospitals: is there a business case for quality?Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25 (1):204-11. [Context Link]
5. Spetz J, Given R. The future of the nurse shortage: will wage increases close the gap?Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(6):199-206. [Context Link]
6. Coffman JM, et al. Minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in acute care hospitals in California. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(5):53-64. [Context Link]
7. Spetz J, et al. Hospital demand for licensed practical nurses. West J Nurs Res [In press]. [Context Link]













