Obesity is an epidemic in the United States, and at present, surgical intervention appears to be the most effective means of achieving significant and sustainable weight loss. Recent data suggests that there are over 9 million people in the United States with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or higher.1
![]() | Figure. No caption available. |
Over the past decade, the number of bariatric procedures has increased 644%2, estimated at 103,000 in 2003 and 205,000 in 2007.3,4 Surgical options, including the relatively simple and safe laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, the Roux-en-Y gastric by-pass, and the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, can all result in massive weight loss (MWL) (more than 50% of a patient's excess weight). This massive loss of subcut-aneous fat often leads to laxity and redundancy of the skin on the abdomen, breasts, arms, legs, and face. Running parallel with the increasing number of bariatric procedures has been the dramatic increase in the number of body contouring procedures performed. Nearly 56,000 procedures were performed in 2004 on MWL patients, accounting for more than half of all body contouring procedures done in the United States.5
Effects of MWL
MWL can significantly improve the health of morbidly obese patients, often precipitating improvement, re-mission, or resolution of comorbid conditions such as diabetes and sleep apnea.6,7 MWL has also been shown to improve quality and length of life.7 For a large percentage of postbariatric patients, however, new symptomatology resulting from functional and psychosocial disturbances can occur as a result of loose and hanging skin and the causative folds. Con-tinued health problems in this patient population, including intertriginous dermatitis, chafing, immobility, pain, difficulties with personal hygiene and sexual intercourse, and disparagement of body image, can have a negative impact on quality of life. Postobese patients seeking cosmetic surgery reported levels of body uneasiness and body image dissatisfaction similar to those of morbidly obese patients.8 Body contouring procedures after surgical weight loss can improve both quality-of-life measurements and body image.9
Assessment of the problem
MWL patients present with complaints about their appearance. The lower trunk area is often the source of complaints, such as a sagging abdomen with hanging pannus, muscle wall weakness, hernias, drooping buttocks, and ptosis of the mons pubis. Deformities of the upper body include loss of volume and ptosis of the breasts, and hanging folds of skin and tissue on the lateral chest, back, flanks, and upper arms. Depending on the patient's extraperitoneal fat distribution pattern (central or apple-shape versus gynecoid or pear-shaped), MWL may or may not affect the thighs. Skin redundancy can occur with or without persistent soft bulkiness of subcutaneous tissues. Poor skin tone, often a result of long-lasting tension on the dermal layer, yo-yo dieting, and loss of collagen and elastin, can become an ongoing challenge.
Circumferential body lifts or simultaneous ab- dominoplasty, thigh, and buttocks lifts are emerging as preferred methods of treatment for a vast number of postobese patients.10 The plastic surgeon's approach must be individually tailored to address the various manifestations of the same abnormality. The timing and staging of procedures varies depending on the pathology of the patient as well as the extent of the planned staging of the surgical procedures.
Surgical approaches
Procedures including abdominoplasty, liposuction, and circumferential body lift (belt lipectomy) with umbilical preservation are performed to treat an overhanging abdominal pannus, the most commonly occurring deformity after MWL.11 During an abdominoplasty, the surgeon removes excess skin using a transverse elliptical incision bordering the suprapubic region inferiorly and passing above the umbilicus superiorly. The umbilicus is mobilized and reimplanted to an anatomically correct position. During a circumferential body lift, the excision is continued around the body with the posterior incisions nearing the upper borders of the buttocks and extending into the intergluteal fold. Age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, nutritional status, and history of smoking have been identified as factors that influence the surgeon's preferred approach.10
Breast deformities following MWL include decreased skin elasticity, shape distortion, severe volume loss, and axillary skin redundancy. Breasts are assessed preoperatively for symmetry, nipple position, volume of breast tissue, and presence of lateral skin excess; breasts often require parenchymal reshaping and dermal suspension to correct these deformities.12 Augmentation with saline/silicone implants or autologous tissue is often necessary to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result.
Upper arm deformities following MWL, described as "bat wings," are embarrassing for patients and are difficult to conceal. Brachio-plasty is usually performed to treat this problem, using an elliptical excision from the axillary crease extending to the region of the elbow. An L or T-shaped excision may be used where excess skin is contiguous with the lateral chest wall. Incisions are made in the inferior-most aspect of the abducted arm or the bicipital groove; the latter usually offers a better scar position.
Patient evaluation and preparation
Optimization of the MWL patient undergoing body contouring is necessary to ensure the best possible results. Patients should be at a stable weight for 6 to 12 months with no further weight loss expected.
Preoperative evaluation should include an assessment of the patient's medical and psychological status. A comprehensive health history should be obtained from patients early in the evaluation process and should aim to identify any comorbid conditions, as well as assess for the acuity, stability, and complications of these comorbidities. The patient should be evaluated for any psychopathologies as well. A medication history including over-the-counter and herbal supplements should be obtained, and the patient counseled to discontinue any supplements that may compromise hemostasis.
The skin surrounding or overlying the intended surgical site should be inspected for evidence of infection or ulceration; any positive findings should be treated prior to surgery. The abdomen should be examined for any surgical scars that might compromise blood supply and result in skin or tissue loss. High-risk patients should be referred to specialists for medical clearance prior to surgery.
Nutritional status should be evaluated and optimized as adequate nutrition is necessary for optimal wound healing following surgery. Following malabsorptive bariatric procedures, patients are at risk for developing protein and micronutrient deficiencies, specifically iron, vitamin B12, calcium, vitamin D, and folic acid.13
All patients should be evaluated for complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and ferritin levels. Serum albumin level should be measured to determine if the patient has sufficient protein stores. Studies have shown that a low serum albumin is a predictor of poor surgical outcomes.14 Micronutrient and protein abnormalities should be corrected with supplementation prior to any body contouring procedure.
The association between cigarette smoking and delayed wound healing is well recognized in clinical practice.15,16 A smoking history should be elicited; current tobacco users should be counseled about cessation at least 1 month prior to and after surgery.
Patients should be educated about surgical options and the potential benefits and risks of individual procedures. Informed consent should be obtained as well. Patients need to have realistic expectations and understand that perfection isn't likely and scarring is unavoidable.
Postoperative discomfort and an extended period of recovery should be anticipated. Patients should be provided with written preoperative and postoperative instructions, including care of drains where appropriate. Preoperative photographs can provide the patient and surgeon with perspective postoperatively.
Financial considerations
The costs of surgical procedures, including facility and anesthesia fees, require discussion and full disclosure to the patient preoperatively. Although insurers provide coverage for the surgical procedure to induce weight loss, patients may be surprised to learn they may have to pay out-of-pocket for body contouring, which is often considered cosmetic.
Perioperative considerations
Patients undergoing body contouring procedures following MWL need special perioperative consideration. Despite significant weight loss, many patients will still have a large body habitus, rendering them at high risk for serious postoperative complications such as pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary emboli (PE).
Facilities performing body contouring procedures must have equipment that can accommodate patients who weigh more than 350 lbs. The OR beds and stretchers must be able to rotate and tilt to gain adequate exposure. Extra-large patient gowns and BP cuffs should be routinely stocked. Positioning the patient is a challenge, so additional padded safety belts, gel or foam pads, and large elastic bandages are needed to prevent injury and movement of the extremities during surgery.
Careful planning and implementation of care can significantly reduce the risk of potential complications. Pneumatic compression devices (PCDs) should be applied on bilateral lower extremities for all patients prior to induction of anesthesia. Patients with a BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 should be given a preoperative dose of heparin sodium subcutaneously for DVT prophylaxis and repeated 8 hours after surgery. PCDs and low-dose anticoagulation for DVT prophylaxis are continued until the patient is ambulating postoperatively. A first-generation cephalosporin or equivalent for allergic patients should be administered at the onset of the procedure and then repeated intraoperatively based on the half life of the particular antibiotic being used.17
Marking the areas to be excised is often performed first with the patient standing, and then with the patient lying down. These markings provide a blueprint for the surgeon, and are critical to the success of the body contouring procedure.
Certain procedures will require the patient to be repositioned during surgery. At each position change, adequate padding should be used for all pressure areas, and the cautery pads and indwelling catheter should be in the proper position.
Following surgery, movement should be minimized until the patient is fully awake. Early ambulation can help prevent both pulmonary and thromboembolic events postoperatively. Options for pain management include epidural administration of analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia, or I.M. analgesics, and will depend on the extent of the surgical procedure. Compression bandages or garments may be utilized postoperatively to minimize bleeding and seroma formation.
Complications
Following body contouring procedures, patients are at risk for complications; rates as high as 50% have been reported.10 Factors that may contribute to increased rates of complications include age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiology class, smoking status, comorbidities, specimen weight, and operative duration.15 Potential complications range from relatively minor incidents treated on an outpatient basis to serious complications that require prolonged hospitalization, as well as additional surgical procedures, blood transfusions, and in rare cases, can be life-threatening. These complications include seroma, hematoma, surgical site infection, dehiscence, blood loss requiring transfusion, tissue and flap necrosis, respiratory distress, DVT, PE, and wounds requiring debridement, dressings, vacuum-assisted closure therapy, or delayed primary closure. OR
REFERENCES
1. American Obesity Association. Obesity in the U.S. Available at: http://obesity1.tempdomainname.com/subs/fastfacts/obesity_US.shtml . Accessed June 13, 2008.2. Steinbrook R. Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2004;350: 1075-1079. [Context Link]
3. Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1157-1164. [Context Link]
4. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Fact Sheet. Bariatric Surgery. Available at http://www.asbs.org/Newsite07/media/asbs_presskit.htm Accessed June 13, 2008. [Context Link]
5. Massive weight loss patients create mass appeal for body contouring procedures. American Society of Plastic Surgeons press release. March 16, 2005. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/media/press_releases/Body-Contouring.cfm Accessed June 13, 2008. [Context Link]
6. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724-1737. [Context Link]
7. Karlsson J, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M. Swedish obese subjects (SOS): an intervention study of obesity: two year follow-up of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) and eating behavior after surgery for severe obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:113-126. [Context Link]
8. Pecori L, Serra Cervetti GG, Marinari GM et al. Attitudes of morbid-ly obese patients to weight loss and body image following bariatric surgery and body contouring. Obes Surg. 2007;17(1):68-73. [Context Link]
9. Song AY, Rubin JP, Thomas v et al. Body image and quality of life in post massive weight loss body contouring patients. Obesity. 2006;14(9): 1626-1636. [Context Link]
10. Nemerofsky RB, Oliak DA, Capella JF. Body lift: an account of 200 consecutive cases in the massive weight loss patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Feb;117(2):414-430. [Context Link]
11. Borud LJ, Warren AG. Modified vertical abdominoplasty in the massive weight loss patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1911-1921. [Context Link]
12. Rubin JP, Agha-Mohammadi S, O'Toole JP. Breast reshaping after massive weight loss. In: Aly AS. Body Contouring After Massive Weight Loss. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc, 2006:362-378. [Context Link]
13. Parkes E. Nutritional management of patients after bariatric surgery. Am J Med Sci. 2006;331(4):207-213. [Context Link]
14. Gibb J, Cull W, Henderson W, Daley J, et al. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity. Arch Surg. 1999;134:36-42. [Context Link]
15. Silverstein P. Smoking and wound healing. Am J Med. 1992;15; 93(1A):22S-24S. [Context Link]
16. Sorensen LT, Karlsmark T, Gottrup F. Abstinence from smoking reduces incisional wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):1-5. [Context Link]
17. Woods RK, Dellinger EP. Current guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wounds. Am Fam Phys. 1998. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/980600ap/woods.html . Accessed June 13, 2008. [Context Link]
18. Arthurs ZM, Cuadrado D, Sohn V et al. Post-bariatric panniculectomy: prepanniculectomy body mass index impacts the complication profile. Am J Surg. 2007 May;193(5):567-570. [Context Link]







