HIV, older adults, PEP, postexposure prophylaxis, preexposure prophylaxis, PrEP, prevention, treatment



  1. Kwong, Jeffrey DNP, MPH, AGPCNP-BC, FAANP


The field of HIV treatment and prevention has evolved rapidly over the past four decades. New therapies that are more potent and streamlined have transformed HIV into a chronic disease, while the use of such preventive strategies as preexposure prophylaxis and postexposure prophylaxis provide effective options for reducing the risk of HIV infection. These medical breakthroughs have enabled more people living with HIV (PLWH) to reach older adulthood. But they also mean that nurses are seeing more PLWH who have developed long-term complications of living with HIV or of exposure to antiretroviral therapy, as well as concurrent chronic conditions associated with advanced age. Nurses play a critical role in caring for PLWH and those at risk for HIV infection. This article discusses HIV epidemiology, describes the current state of HIV treatment and prevention, and highlights common comorbidities often seen in PLWH who are over age 50.


Article Content

"I wasn't supposed to be here," said John Marchese to the nurse as he watched the last few drops of his chemotherapy drug infuse into the port implanted in his chest. (This case is a composite based on my experience.) The nurse caring for him smiled while preparing to disconnect his iv tubing and flush the port. Mr. Marchese, age 69, was finishing his last round of chemotherapy for stage II lung cancer. He, like many other patients the nurse had recently cared for, had several additional chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease. What distinguished Mr. Marchese from the nurse's other patients was that he had been living with HIV for 32 years. But given the tremendous advances in the treatment and prevention of HIV over the past several decades, patients like Mr. Marchese are no longer a rarity.

Figure. The 909090 t... - Click to enlarge in new window The 90-90-90 targets for HIV-AIDS treatment and prevention were set in 2014 by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), which aims to achieve all three by 2020. Image (C) Source: UNAIDS.

Nearly 38 years after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that five young, white, previously healthy gay men in Los Angeles had been diagnosed with pneumocystis pneumonia and other infections suggestive of immune dysfunction,1 significant progress has been made in the management and prevention of what is now known as HIV infection. The availability of effective HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed a disease that once meant an early death into a chronic illness. Today, a 20-year-old diagnosed with HIV infection is estimated to have a life expectancy of more than 70 years.2 As new HIV treatments and novel preventive interventions have been developed, the mean age of people living with HIV (PLWH) has risen, and nurses continue to play a vital role in all aspects of patient care. This article reviews current epidemiologic trends in HIV, summarizes the latest information on ART, highlights common comorbidities (particularly among older PLWH), and describes the latest options in HIV prophylaxis.



CDC data from 2015 suggest that nearly 1.13 million people ages 13 and older living in the United States have diagnosed or undiagnosed HIV infection, the majority (56%) of whom are males who acquired HIV through sex with another male.3 Females account for roughly 23% of all HIV cases, with 78% having acquired the virus through heterosexual sex. The racial and ethnic breakdown is as follows:


* black, 42%


* white, 30%


* Hispanic or Latino, 22%


* multiracial, 4%


* Asian, 1%


* other, less than 1%



U.S. mortality rates (reflecting deaths from any cause) among people with a diagnosis of HIV have gradually declined in recent years, from 5.2 per 100,000 in 2012 to 4.8 per 100,000 in 2016.4 During this period, HIV-associated deaths declined from 7,216 in 2012 to 6,160 in 2016.5, 6


An overall decline in U.S. incidence. The annual incidence of new HIV diagnoses in the United States dropped from 41,180 in 2012 to 38,281 in 2017, representing a decrease of 7%.4 Although there were reductions during this period in all major risk groups, including men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs, and heterosexuals, diagnoses increased among the following ethnic groups: American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asians, and those of Hispanic or Latino origin.


U.S. incidence among MSM. In 2017, MSM remained the population most affected by HIV in the United States and its six dependent areas (Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, among others), accounting for 66% of all HIV diagnoses (25,748/38,739) and 82% of HIV diagnoses among males (25,748/31,239).4 Between 2012 and 2016, the incidence of HIV among MSM varied by race and ethnicity, increasing 12% among Hispanics or Latinos, remaining stable among blacks, and decreasing 14% among whites.7 It has been estimated that the lifetime risk of acquiring HIV for MSM in the following ethnic groups is8


* one in two among blacks.


* one in five among Hispanics or Latinos.


* one in 11 among whites.



U.S. incidence by age and sex. In 2016, adults ages 20 through 29 accounted for the largest percentage (about 37%) of new HIV infections in the United States and its six dependent areas, while people over age 50 accounted for about 17% of new infections that year, most of whom (41%) were age 54 or younger.4 Nearly 19% of new HIV infections in 2017 occurred in female adults and adolescents, with more than half (59%) diagnosed in black women who acquired HIV through heterosexual contact.4 The lifetime risk of acquiring HIV has been estimated to be one in 253 for females and one in 68 for males.8


Among transgender populations, data on HIV incidence and prevalence are limited, but a recent analysis found that between 2009 and 2014 more than 2,300 transgender women and men were newly diagnosed with HIV, with transgender women accounting for 84% of cases.9



The process of screening for and diagnosing HIV, initiating ART in people with newly diagnosed HIV, and reducing their viral loads to undetectable levels is often referred to as the "HIV care continuum."10 In 2014, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) launched the following 90-90-90 targets, with the aim of achieving all three by the end of 202011:


* 90% of PLWH will know their HIV status


* 90% of PLWH who know their status will be receiving treatment


* 90% of PLWH who are receiving treatment will achieve and maintain viral suppression, with some countries requiring viral loads to be undetectable for reporting purposes



The continuum provides a framework for assessing the care of PLWH. At the end of 2016, seven countries had achieved this ambitious goal: Botswana, Cambodia, Denmark, Iceland, Singapore, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.11 Progress continues to be made worldwide, but in the United States only 86% of all PLWH are aware of their HIV status, 63% receive HIV treatment, and 49% have an undetectable viral load.10


Many factors can influence the success of meeting the targets along the continuum, including stigma, income, race, and mental health or substance use comorbidities.12-14 Nurses can help patients meet targets in all phases of the continuum by


* normalizing and advocating for routine HIV testing.


* providing outreach and support to people who may be reluctant or unable to seek medical care.


* promoting adherence in patients receiving ART so they may keep their HIV viral load at an undetectable level.




Since combination ART for HIV became widely available in the mid-1990s, treatment options and clinical guidelines that inform practice have continued to evolve. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) updates guidelines for HIV management every six to 12 months. Recent approvals of new drug classes and clinical trial data have transformed HIV care.


The benefits of ART have been well documented and include preserved immune function, improved quality of life, and reduced risk of HIV transmission.15 However, the answer to the question of how soon after diagnosis should ART be initiated has varied throughout the years.


Earlier ART guidelines used CD4+ cell counts and HIV viral load as indicators for initiating treatment. ART was recommended only for those whose CD4+ cell count fell below 350 cells/mm3. The rationale for delaying ART was to limit exposure to possible treatment-related adverse effects of early-generation therapy, such as the nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) azidothymidine, or AZT (now called zidovudine [Retrovir]); the protease inhibitors saquinavir (Invirase), ritonavir (Norvir), nelfinavir (Viracept), and indinavir (Crixivan); and the entry inhibitor enfuvirtide (Fuzeon). These were used in older regimens requiring multiple tablets and multiple day dosing and were associated with such adverse effects as body fat redistribution (lipodystrophy), insulin resistance, anemia, kidney stones, gastrointestinal problems, lactic acidosis, and peripheral neuropathy. This "wait and watch" paradigm has been abandoned and ART is now recommended regardless of CD4+ cell count or viral load.16


The START (Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy) study was a major factor in revising the ART recommendations. START was a large, international trial in which a group of PLWH who had CD4+ cell counts of at least 500 cells/mm3 were randomly assigned either to receive ART immediately or to follow what in 2011 was the standard of care for initiating ART-that is, to defer treatment until their CD4+ cell counts fell to 350 cells/mm3 or they developed AIDS or another condition for which ART was then indicated.17,18 Those who started ART at higher CD4+ cell counts had a 54% lower mortality rate than those who deferred therapy. Data from the START trial and other similar studies led to the revision of the ART guidelines, and in 2018 the HHS published Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV, which specify no CD4+ cell count or viral load prerequisites for the receipt of ART, calling for all PLWH to receive it.16


Rapid start. More recently, the idea of initiating ART regardless of CD4+ cell count has been further modified. Referred to as "rapid start," this model recommends initiating ART on or as close as possible to the day of HIV diagnosis-and it has shortened the length of time it takes a person to achieve virologic suppression of HIV. At San Francisco's Rapid ART Program Initiative for HIV Diagnoses (RAPID), the protocol is to initiate ART in all PLWH within five days of HIV diagnosis unless the person is at risk for fatal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome.19 Time from diagnosis to first undetectable viral load dropped from 134 days in 2013 to 61 days in 2016.19 This 54% reduction suggests the benefit and success of rapid start as a means of engaging people in care, reducing HIV transmission in the community, and supporting the goals of the HIV care continuum. Although the recommendations regarding ART initiation have changed, the patient counseling, education, and support provided by nurses are still vitally important in promoting treatment adherence and engagement in care.



Currently, there are six classes of antiretroviral drugs, and more than 20 different antiretroviral agents are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for HIV treatment (see Table 1). Over the years, HIV therapy options have improved significantly. Today, many PLWH can be treated with a single-tablet regimen, rather than with a complex regimen involving multiple pills taken several times a day. Although single-tablet regimens may not be suitable for all PLWH, most people with newly diagnosed HIV may now choose among several such regimens.

Table 1 - Click to enlarge in new window Approved HIV Antiretroviral Therapy for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infectiona

The HIV treatment paradigm has for the last two decades called for the use of at least three different drugs from two different drug classes. For most PLWH, the initial therapy has included two NRTIs plus a drug from another class, usually an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI). (See Table 2.16) Alternatively, a protease inhibitor or a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) could be used as the third agent.16 NRTIs and INSTIs work by inhibiting the production of reverse transcriptase and integrase, respectively, two key enzymes needed for the virus to reproduce. In recent years, however, potential long-term adverse effects associated with some NRTIs, such as renal and cardiovascular disease, as well as reduced bone mineral density, have raised concerns.20-22 Subsequently, NRTI-sparing options have received more attention.

Table 2 - Click to enlarge in new window HHS Guidelines Preferred First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy for Most People Living with HIV16

NRTI-sparing options. In 2017, a pill combining an INSTI with an NNRTI, dolutegravir-rilpivirine (Juluca), was the first NRTI-sparing, single-tablet regimen approved by the FDA as a replacement ART for PLWH whose viral loads were undetectable. In such patients, study data showed this combination to be as effective as the traditional three-drug ART regimens while minimizing NRTI toxicities and limiting drug-drug interactions.23 The tablet is taken once daily with food and should not be used in conjunction with proton pump inhibitors, which can significantly lower rilpivirine plasma concentrations, thereby reducing virologic response.24


A new advisory regarding dolutegravir, which is available as a stand-alone agent (Tivicay) and is a component of Juluca, as well as of two other single-tablet regimens-dolutegravir-abacavir-lamivudine (Triumeq) and dolutegravir-lamivudine (Dovato)-was issued in May 2018.25 Higher rates of neural tube defects were noted in pregnant women receiving dolutegravir-containing regimens, and as a result women with HIV who were pregnant or thinking of becoming pregnant were advised to consider an alternative HIV regimen. New data, however, suggest that this risk is significantly lower than initially thought, prompting the World Health Organization to recommend dolutegravir as the preferred HIV treatment in all populations, including pregnant women.26


Pharmacokinetic boosters. Some ART regimens require a pharmacokinetic boosting agent, which reduces dosing frequency, often allowing for once-daily dosing.16 The two boosting agents most often used are the cytochrome P-450 3A inhibitor cobicistat (Tybost) and the protease inhibitor ritonavir.16 Pharmacokinetic boosters should be used with caution because they increase the likelihood of drug-drug interactions.27 Although it is always important to review all patient prescriptions and over-the-counter medications, it is particularly so when counseling patients on an ART regimen that includes a boosting agent.


The CD4-directed postattachment HIV-1 inhibitor ibalizumab (Trogarzo) is effective against multidrug-resistant HIV,28 which is estimated to affect fewer than 5% of people receiving ART.29 Recently approved by the FDA, ibalizumab is used in combination with other antiretrovirals and is administered by iv infusion every two weeks.28 The most common adverse effect is diarrhea, which affects about 20% of patients. Other adverse effects include dizziness and rash, which affect about 13% of patients, as well as nausea, fatigue, and pyrexia. Most adverse effects (87%) are mild to moderate in severity.28


The newest FDA-approved medication is Dovato, the single-tablet INSTI-NRTI regimen. It is currently indicated for PLWH who have no prior history of ART. Although the tablet's two components (dolutegravir and lamivudine) are not new, combining two drugs from different classes in a single tablet is part of the new paradigm, which moves away from the more common triple-drug regimen.30, 31



CDC data indicate that 47% of PLWH in the United States were age 50 or older in 2015.32 In the coming decade, the percentage of PLWH over age 50 is expected to rise.2 The aging of this population means health care providers are increasingly likely to see PLWH presenting with comorbidities that historically have not been associated with HIV, such as cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and other noncommunicable diseases that become more common in advanced age. Some research suggests that, in addition to advanced age, excess morbidity among older PLWH may be due to long-term effects of inflammation and immune dysregulation brought on by HIV or to potential long-term effects of ART.33


Cardiovascular disease. Recent findings suggest that PLWH may be at greater risk for cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic disease, dyslipidemia, and stroke, than people without HIV.34, 35 Although the reasons for these differences are not clear, it has been suggested that the inflammatory effects of chronic HIV infection may accelerate atherosclerosis.34, 35


The NRTI abacavir (Ziagen) has been associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events compared with other NRTIs.36 The current HHS treatment guidelines recommend limiting the use of abacavir in people who are at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease, such as those who are obese or have hypertension.16 In PLWH who have heart disease or are at elevated risk for it, management is similar to that in people without HIV: reducing risk by using statins, eating a healthy diet, exercising, maintaining a healthy weight, and not smoking.37


Chronic kidney disease commonly affects PLWH, with the estimated prevalence exceeding 50% in some studies.38 The development of chronic kidney disease in this population has been attributed to such factors as ART, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.39 Clinicians should monitor their patients' renal function closely and adjust the dosage of ART and other medications accordingly. For people with more advanced chronic kidney disease, organ transplants are becoming more widely available. PLWH undergoing kidney transplants have had similar outcomes to those of HIV-uninfected people undergoing kidney transplants.40


Type 2 diabetes rates have been found to be higher in PLWH than in people without HIV, with prevalence estimated as nearly 4% higher in PLWH, who may develop type 2 diabetes in the absence of obesity and at earlier ages than those without HIV.41 Although use of ART has been associated with higher rates of type 2 diabetes in PLWH, characteristics such as obesity remain a risk factor. Detection and screening for type 2 diabetes are similar among PLWH and those without HIV, though some data suggest that measuring glycated hemoglobin may underestimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in PLWH, whereas the use of oral glucose tolerance testing may be more accurate in identifying type 2 diabetes in these patients.42 There are no specific diabetes management guidelines for PLWH; treatment recommendations for oral or injectable glucose-lowering medications and therapeutic goals for glycemic control are the same for PLWH as for people without HIV.


Malignancies. A recent analysis of mortality rates among nearly 47,000 people living in North America who were receiving ART for HIV between 1995 and 2009 found that 9.8% of deaths in this cohort were attributable to cancer-2.6% to AIDS-defining cancers (such as Kaposi sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma) and 7.1% to non-AIDS-defining cancers (such as lung and liver cancers), generating cancer-attributable mortality rates of 86 and 239 per 100,000 person-years, respectively.43 Lung cancer, liver cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma accounted for a large proportion of the cancer-associated deaths. The investigators concluded that, even as AIDS mortality rates and deaths due to AIDS-defining cancers decline among PLWH, deaths due to non-AIDS-defining cancers may rise.43 Since smoking and infection with such oncogenic viruses as hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and human papillomavirus are more prevalent among PLWH, interventions to reduce the cancer burden may include promoting smoking cessation and vaccination for these viruses.44


Neurologic changes.HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder is a cluster of neurologic conditions, whose overall prevalence is estimated to range from 20% to 55%.45 The various manifestations include asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, mild neurocognitive disorder, and HIV-associated dementia. Since the introduction of combination ART, the most serious form, HIV-associated dementia, has become rare, but the milder forms remain common and symptoms can slowly progress from difficulty with concentration, memory, and executive function to psychomotor slowing and affective symptoms such as depression and irritability. Data suggest that PLWH who develop HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder have lower long-term survival rates. Although various nonantiretroviral agents, such as memantine (Namenda), have been used to treat HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder, none has shown clear clinical benefit.45 Exercise has been shown to provide modest improvement in cognitive function among PLWH.46 But ART remains the greatest protection against HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder and should be initiated in all PLWH who are not currently receiving it-not only to prevent neurocognitive decline, but to help PLWH achieve undetectable viral loads.


Peripheral neuropathy. Some PLWH who started receiving early-generation ART long ago may develop painful peripheral neuropathy. A recent analysis estimated its prevalence in PLWH to be approximately 31%, with risk factors including advanced age, higher CD4+ cell counts, and tobacco use.47 Management of peripheral neuropathy involves limiting or stopping any medications that may worsen neuropathic symptoms and initiating the use of medications known to relieve neuropathic pain, such as gabapentin (Neurontin) or tricyclic antidepressants.



Nursing considerations for the aging population of PLWH are focused on preventing and reducing the effects of noncommunicable comorbidities. Patient teaching should stress the importance of the following:


* tobacco cessation


* nutritional recommendations for reducing risk of heart disease


* age-related cancer screenings


* medication adherence


* receiving vaccines for oncogenic viral infections, such as hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and human papillomavirus



Reviewing medication lists for drug-drug interactions and assessing and monitoring patient pain levels can also improve the health and quality of life for older PLWH.



Just as HIV treatment has evolved, so too has the field of HIV prevention. While traditional preventive measures such as the use of barriers to prevent sexual transmission and routine HIV testing are still important, new biomedical preventive options are now available. The use of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) have given patients and providers more opportunities to curb the spread of HIV infection.


PrEP. The availability of PrEP, which reduces the risk of acquiring HIV, has played a pivotal role in curbing the HIV epidemic. Currently, the only FDA-approved form of PrEP is the single-tablet regimen Truvada, containing the NRTIs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. Traditionally, these two NRTIs have been used to treat HIV in combination with other antiretrovirals. However, in July 2012, the FDA approved use of Truvada as part of a comprehensive prevention strategy for adults and adolescents who are not infected with HIV and weigh at least 35 kg (77 lbs).15, 48 Truvada is taken orally once daily, with or without food. Use of PrEP may benefit people who15


* have multiple sex partners.


* were recently diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection.


* report inconsistent condom use.


* were recently prescribed nonoccupational-PEP.


* inject drugs or share drug-use paraphernalia.



Efficacy of Truvada in reducing HIV infection in at-risk populations has been shown to be about 99%, with the greatest benefit among people who demonstrated regular adherence to therapy.49, 50 It is important for people taking PrEP to have their HIV status monitored regularly to ensure they remain uninfected. Patients must be HIV uninfected to be eligible for PrEP, and before starting PrEP, the patient's HIV-negative status must be confirmed. Any patients experiencing flu-like symptoms, which may be suggestive of acute HIV infection, should defer PrEP until their HIV status can be confirmed and other baseline laboratory testing performed.15 (See Table 3.15) Since tenofovir disoproxil fumarate can affect renal function, patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 60 mL/min should not be prescribed Truvada.15

Table 3 - Click to enlarge in new window Baseline Evaluation for PrEP15

The components of Truvada are also active against hepatitis B, so PLWH who have chronic hepatitis B and discontinue PrEP need to be monitored closely because they may experience a hepatitis B flare-up. Although pregnancy is not a contraindication for Truvada, there are insufficient data on its use as an HIV prophylaxis during pregnancy. Providers are encouraged to report pregnant patients receiving Truvada to the antiretroviral pregnancy registry to monitor and document birth outcomes. U.S. Public Health Service guidelines recommend that patients who initiate Truvada for PrEP return every three months for screening and monitoring.15


Although PrEP has been available in the United States since 2012, uptake has been limited. One study estimates that of the 1.2 million people who would benefit from PrEP, only 5% are receiving it.51 And though MSM and heterosexual adults who are black make up the largest group with PrEP indications, only a small percentage of this group uses PrEP.52 Factors that limit more widespread PrEP use include the following14, 53:


* lack of awareness among both clinicians and patients that Truvada is available for prevention


* internalized stigma related to sexual practices, sexual identity, or race


* patients' fear of being perceived as sexually promiscuous


* providers' discomfort discussing patients' sexual history


* poverty, lack of insurance coverage, and inequities in Medicaid and health care access programs



Although most insurance companies cover Truvada for PrEP, copayments vary considerably, putting the cost of the medication, which can be as high as $2,000 per month, out of reach for many patients.54 However, a number of states, patient advocate programs, and the manufacturer have established copay and medication assistance programs. The National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors has compiled an online information page detailing the assistance these programs offer and eligibility requirements (see A generic version of Truvada for PrEP will be available in September 2020. Patient advocates are cautiously optimistic that this may lower the cost for U.S. consumers.54


A new PrEP alternative-emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide (Descovy), which is currently approved only for HIV treatment-is expected to receive FDA approval this fall.


PEP. Nonoccupational PEP is prescribed as a means of reducing the risk of HIV infection in people who have been potentially exposed to HIV outside of a health care setting-for example, people who have an isolated high-risk exposure (such as an unplanned condomless sexual encounter) and who are not receiving PrEP. Nonoccupational PEP is similar to the PEP provided to health care workers who have been potentially exposed to HIV through a needlestick or a patient's bodily fluids (see PEP for Health Care Workers55).

Box. PEP for Health ... - Click to enlarge in new window PEP for Health Care Workers55

PEP involves taking ART for 28 days following HIV exposure to help reduce or minimize the risk of infection. The most common regimen for PEP is Truvada with an INSTI, either raltegravir (Isentress) or dolutegravir. This intervention needs to be initiated as soon as possible after the exposure, but no more than 72 hours afterward.56 Unlike PrEP, the use of which is supported by several placebo-controlled trials, the evidence for PEP is based on animal models and observational studies. Nonetheless, these studies suggest a reduction in HIV transmission, and PEP is now considered the standard of care for post-HIV exposure.56


Baseline laboratory studies upon initiating PEP should include HIV antigen-antibody testing-but treatment with PEP should be started immediately, before the results of the baseline testing are available. Monitoring and follow-up HIV testing are usually conducted at four and 12 weeks after treatment is initiated.56 During this time, patients should be counseled as follows:


* If engaging in sexual contact, continue to use barrier methods until your HIV status is confirmed at 12 weeks.


* Self-monitor for signs and symptoms of acute HIV infection, which include flu-like symptoms, and report any symptoms to your health care provider as soon as possible.



Nurses can educate and counsel patients who may be at risk for acquiring HIV on the availability of PrEP and PEP to reduce their risk. At the same time, nurses can reinforce the added benefits of using barrier methods during sexual encounters and the importance of obtaining regular screenings for sexually transmitted infections.


'Treatment as prevention' and U=U. Preventing the spread of HIV by helping PLWH maintain an undetectable viral load (defined as fewer than 200 copies/mL) is referred to as "treatment as prevention" or TasP.57 An observational multicenter study including both heterosexual and MSM couples in which one partner is receiving ART for HIV and the other is HIV negative has shown that the risk of sexually transmitting the virus is negligible to nonexistent if the partner with HIV maintains an undetectable viral load for at least six months.58 More recently, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases also endorsed the "undetectable = untransmittable" campaign, or U=U.59 This campaign reframes the benefits of ART as it destigmatizes the idea that living with HIV is socially marginalizing. Nurses working with PWLH or with people whose partner is living with HIV can reinforce this message and emphasize the benefits of ART. They can address the issue of sexual health as it relates to the fear of transmitting HIV to others and can advocate for PLWH to receive full access to treatment.




The future of HIV treatment and prevention is promising. Topical microbicides intended for PrEP are currently under investigation, as well as long-acting injectable ART formulations and implants (similar to long-acting contraceptive implants) that can be used either to treat or to prevent HIV infection.60 The discovery of a vaccine still eludes scientists, but research continues.


Another area of continuing exploration is the quest for an HIV cure. Until recently, only one patient had been believed to have been cured of HIV. Known as the "Berlin patient," he was cured in 2007 after receiving bone marrow transplants for his leukemia from a donor with a protein mutation called CCR5.61 This past March, however, a team of infectious disease physicians from the University of Cambridge announced that a second apparent HIV cure had occurred under similar circumstances. A man identified as the "London patient" received a bone marrow transplant for his Hodgkin lymphoma, also from a donor with the CCR5 mutation, after which physicians discovered that the HIV virus had completely disappeared from his bloodstream.62, 63 The patient stopped taking ART 16 months later, and at 18-month follow-up he continued to be free of the virus.


Although researchers point out that bone marrow transplants, which can have fatal complications, are not suitable treatments for the majority of PLWH for whom ART poses far fewer risks, this second case provides hope that for PLWH who require a bone marrow transplant to treat a malignancy, it may be appropriate to search for a donor with the CCR5 mutation.64



As HIV treatment and prevention continue to evolve, nurses are central to all aspects of HIV care, regardless of the clinical setting. It's imperative that nurses working in the acute care setting be able to anticipate and understand the physical and psychological needs of PLWH, who may be admitted for treatment of any number of noncommunicable diseases associated with advanced age, long-term ART, or long-term complications associated with HIV. Nurses working in the community or primary care setting have numerous opportunities to identify patients at risk for HIV infection, informing them of prevention strategies such as PrEP and PEP, and to promote ART adherence among PLWH, while teaching them about strategies to reduce risk factors for other chronic diseases, such as heart disease and diabetes. Working together, nurses and other health care providers can help end the epidemic.




1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pneumocystis pneumonia-Los Angeles MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981 30 21 250-2 [Context Link]


2. Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies Lancet HIV 2017 4 8 e349-e356 [Context Link]


3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010-2015. Atlanta; 2018 Mar. HIV surveillance supplemental report 23 (no. 1); [Context Link]


4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2017. Atlanta; 2018 Nov. [Context Link]


5. Murphy SL, et al Deaths: final data for 2012 Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015 63 9 1-117 [Context Link]


6. Xu J, et al Deaths: final data for 2016 Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018 67 5 1-76 [Context Link]


7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the United States and dependent areas. Atlanta; 2019 Jan. [Context Link]


8. Hess KL, et al Lifetime risk of a diagnosis of HIV infection in the United States Ann Epidemiol 2017 27 4 238-43 [Context Link]


9. Clark H, et al Diagnosed HIV infection in transgender adults and adolescents: results from the National HIV Surveillance System, 2009-2014 AIDS Behav 2017 21 9 2774-83 [Context Link]


10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Understanding the HIV care continuum. Atlanta; 2018 Jun. [Context Link]


11. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Ending AIDS: progress towards the 90-90-90 targets. Geneva, Switzerland; 2017. UNAIDS/JC2900E. Global AIDS update; [Context Link]


12. Fojo AT, et al Do symptoms of depression interact with substance use to affect HIV continuum of care outcomes? AIDS Behav 2019 23 3 580-91 [Context Link]


13. Kay ES, et al The HIV treatment cascade and care continuum: updates, goals, and recommendations for the future AIDS Res Ther 2016 13 35 [Context Link]


14. Mayer KH, et al Evolving models and ongoing challenges for HIV preexposure prophylaxis implementation in the United States J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018 77 2 119-27 [Context Link]


15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Public Health Service. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2017 update: a clinical practice guideline. Atlanta; 2018 Mar. [Context Link]


16. Department of Health and Human Services, Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents living with HIV. Washington, DC; 2018 Oct 25. [Context Link]


17. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011 Oct 14. [Context Link]


18. INSIGHT START Study Group, et al. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection N Engl J Med 2015 373 9 795-807 [Context Link]


19. Bacon O, et al The rapid ART program initiative for HIV diagnosis (RAPID) in San Francisco. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2018 Mar Boston: CROI Foundation/IAS-USA; 2018. [Context Link]


20. Corado KC, et al Two-drug regimens for treatment of naive HIV-1 infection and as maintenance therapy Drug Des Devel Ther 2018 12 3731-40 [Context Link]


21. Nan C, et al Abacavir use and risk for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: pooled analysis of data from clinical trials Open Forum Infect Dis 2018 5 5 ofy086 [Context Link]


22. Unsal AB, et al Effect of antiretroviral therapy on bone and renal health in young adults infected with HIV in early life J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017 102 8 2896-904 [Context Link]


23. Llibre JM, et al Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for the maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies Lancet 2018 391 10123 839-49 [Context Link]


24. GlaxoSmithKline. Highlights of prescribing information: Juluca (dolutegravir and rilpivirine tablets), for oral use. Research Triangle Park, NC; 2017. [Context Link]


25. HIV/AIDS News. Recommendations regarding the use of dolutegravir in adults and adolescents with HIV who are pregnant or of child-bearing potential. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2018 May 30. AIDSinfo; [Context Link]


26. World Health Organization. WHO recommends dolutegravir as preferred HIV treatment option in all populations [news release]. Mexico City; 22 July 2019.


27. Tseng A, et al Cobicistat versus ritonavir: similar pharmacokinetic enhancers but some important differences Ann Pharmacother 2017 51 11 1008-22 [Context Link]


28. Emu B, et al Phase 3 study of ibalizumab for multidrug-resistant HIV-1 N Engl J Med 2018 379 7 645-54 [Context Link]


29. De Luca A, et al Declining prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in antiretroviral treatment-exposed individuals in Western Europe J Infect Dis 2013 207 8 1216-20 [Context Link]


30. GlaxoSmithKline. Highlights of prescribing information: Dovato (dolutegravir and lamivudine) tablets, for oral use. Research Triangle Park, NC; 2019 Apr. [Context Link]


31. U.S Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first two-drug complete regimen for HIV-infected patients who have never received antiretroviral treatment [news release]. 2019 Apr 8. [Context Link]


32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among people aged 50 and older. 2018. [Context Link]


33. Mayer KH, et al Excess clinical comorbidity among HIV-infected patients accessing primary care in US community health centers Public Health Rep 2018 133 1 109-18 [Context Link]


34. Barnes RP, et al HIV infection and risk of cardiovascular diseases beyond coronary artery disease Curr Atheroscler Rep 2017 19 5 20 [Context Link]


35. Shah ASV, et al Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV Circulation 2018 138 11 1100-12 [Context Link]


36. Dorjee K, et al Risk of cardiovascular disease associated with exposure to abacavir among individuals with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analyses of results from 17 epidemiologic studies Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018 52 5 541-53 [Context Link]


37. Pinto DSM, da Silva M Cardiovascular disease in the setting of human immunodeficiency virus infection Curr Cardiol Rev 2018 14 1 25-41 [Context Link]


38. Okafor UH, et al Prevalence and clinical and laboratory characteristics of kidney disease in anti-retroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in South-South Nigeria Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2016 27 1 129-34 [Context Link]


39. Park J, Zuniga JA Chronic kidney disease in persons living with HIV: a systematic review J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2018 29 5 655-66 [Context Link]


40. Shaffer AA, Durand CM Solid organ transplantation for HIV-infected individuals Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 2018 10 1 107-20 [Context Link]


41. Hernandez-Romieu AC, et al Is diabetes prevalence higher among HIV-infected individuals compared with the general population? Evidence from MMP and NHANES 2009-2010 BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017 5 1 e000304 [Context Link]


42. Coelho AR, et al Diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected patients: fasting glucose, A1c, or oral glucose tolerance test-which method to choose for the diagnosis? BMC Infect Dis 2018 18 1 309 [Context Link]


43. Engels EA, et al Cancer-attributable mortality among people with treated human immunodeficiency virus infection in North America Clin Infect Dis 2017 65 4 636-43 [Context Link]


44. Park LS, et al Prevalence of non-HIV cancer risk factors in persons living with HIV/AIDS: a meta-analysis AIDS 2016 30 2 273-91 [Context Link]


45. Eggers C, et al HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorder: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment J Neurol 2017 264 8 1715-27 [Context Link]


46. Quigley A, et al Exercise and cognitive function in people living with HIV: a scoping review Disabil Rehabil 2019 41 2 1384-95 [Context Link]


47. Benevides M, et al Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy and associated factors in HIV-infected patients J Neurol Sci 2017 375 316-20 [Context Link]


48. Gilead Sciences Highlights of prescribing information: Truvada (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets, for oral use. Foster City, CA; 2018 May. [Context Link]


49. Huang X, et al Efficacy and safety of oral TDF-based pre-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis Front Pharmacol 2018 9 799 [Context Link]


50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Atlanta; 2019 July 19. [Context Link]


51. Siegler AJ, et al Distribution of active PrEP prescriptions and the PrEP-to-need ratio, U.S., Q2 2017 [abstract 1022LB]. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2018; Boston: CROI Foundation/IAS-USA; 2018. [Context Link]


52. Smith DK By race/ethnicity, blacks have highest number needing PrEP in the United States, 2015. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2018; Boston: CROI Foundation/IAS-USA; 2018. [Context Link]


53. Brooks RA, et al Persistent stigmatizing and negative perceptions of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users: implications for PrEP adoption among Latino men who have sex with men AIDS Care 2019 31 4 427-35 [Context Link]


54. Fitzsimons T Generic HIV prevention drug coming in 2020, Gilead says. ABC News 2019 May 8. [Context Link]


55. Kuhar DT, et al Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013 34 9 875-92 [Context Link]


56. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV-United States, 2016. Atlanta; 2016 Apr 18. [Context Link]


57. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV treatment as prevention: overview. Atlanta; 2019 Jun 19. [Context Link]


58. Rodger A, et al HIV transmission risk through condomless sex in gay couples with suppressive ART: the PARTNER2 study extended results in gay men [PowerPoint]. Amsterdam 2018. [Context Link]


59. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Science validates undetectable = untransmittable HIV prevention message. NIAID Now 2018 Jul 22. [Context Link]


60. Gao Y, et al Recent developments of nanotherapeutics for targeted and long-acting, combination HIV chemotherapy Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2019 138 75-91 [Context Link]


61. Hutter G, et al Long-term control of HIV by CCR5 Delta32/Delta32 stem-cell transplantation N Engl J Med 2009 360 7 692-8 [Context Link]


62. Gupta RK, et al HIV-1 remission following CCR5[INCREMENT]32/[INCREMENT]32 haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation Nature 2019 568 7751 244-8 [Context Link]


63. Mandavilli A HIV is reported cured in a second patient, a milestone in the global AIDS epidemic. New York Times 2019 Mar 4. [Context Link]


64. Warren M Second patient free of HIV after stem-cell therapy. Nature 2019;567(7749). [Context Link]


For 17 additional continuing nursing education activities on the topic of HIV, go to