Authors

  1. Vickerman, Katrina A. PhD
  2. Keller, Paula A. MPH
  3. Deprey, Mona MS
  4. Lachter, Randi B. MPH
  5. Jenssen, Jacalyn MBA
  6. Dreher, Marietta BA

Abstract

Context: Tobacco dependence is well established as a chronic condition typically requiring numerous quit attempts. Tobacco users are unlikely to return to the same cessation program on their own.

 

Objective: This program evaluation examined the effectiveness of using multiple outreach methods to reengage tobacco users in a statewide cessation program at varying time points after their initial program enrollment.

 

Design: Participants were randomized to receive or not receive reengagement outreach. We conducted outreach via phone, e-mail, and/or text (based on methods participants agreed to receive) at 1, 2, or 3 months post-initial engagement. Participants were offered the opportunity to reenroll in QUITPLAN Services.

 

Setting: Minnesota's QUITPLAN Services

 

Participants: A total of 3020 tobacco users who enrolled in Minnesota's QUITPLAN Services and either received a 2-week starter kit of nicotine replacement therapy or completed 0-1 QUITPLAN Helpline calls.

 

Main Outcome Measures: We explored group differences in the odds of reengagement (defined as enrolling in a phone cessation program or selecting 2 or more of nicotine replacement therapy starter kit, text messaging, e-mail program, or print materials), contributors to reengagement, and costs.

 

Results: 14.7% in the Reengagement Outreach (RO) group and 3.4% in the Comparison (no outreach) group reengaged. The majority (71%) reengaged during phone outreach. There were no significant differences in reengagement rates by follow-up time period (1, 2, or 3 months). Cost per reengagement was $546, mostly due to one-time setup costs; scaling to 10 000 tobacco users would cost approximately $101 per reengagement.

 

Conclusions: Conducting proactive outreach through state-funded quitlines is an effective approach to reengaging tobacco users, yielding a 5-fold greater odds of reengagement compared with no outreach. Since most costs were for initial setup, the cost per reengagement would decrease as the outreach population size increases. Such outreach has the potential to foster treatment utilization and quit attempts.