Buy this Article for $10.95

Have a coupon or promotional code? Enter it here:

When you buy this you'll get access to the ePub version, a downloadable PDF, and the ability to print the full article.

Keywords

Clinical simulation, Cognitive workload, Eye tracking, Pupil response

 

Authors

  1. Wilbanks, Bryan A. PhD, DNP, CRNA
  2. Aroke, Edwin PhD, CRNA
  3. Dudding, Katherine M. PhD, RN

Abstract

High-fidelity clinical simulations can be used by clinicians to acquire technical (physical ability and knowledge) and non-technical (cognitive and social processes) skills. Excessive cognitive workload contributes to medical errors because of the impact on both technical and non-technical skills. Many studies measure cognitive workload with psychometric instruments that limit the assessment of cognitive workload to a single time period and may involve response bias. Using eye tracking to measure task-evoked pupillary responses allows the measurement of changes in pupil diameter related to the cognitive workload associated with a specific activity. Incorporating eye tracking with high-fidelity clinical simulations provides a reliable and continuous assessment of cognitive workload. The purpose of this literature review is to summarize the use of eye-tracking technology to measure cognitive workload of healthcare providers to generate evidence-based guidelines for measuring cognitive workload during high-fidelity clinical simulations. What this manuscript adds to the body of literature is a summary of best practices related to the different methods of measuring cognitive workload, benefits and limitations of using eye tracking, and high-fidelity clinical simulation design considerations for successful integration of eye tracking.