Authors

  1. Schexnayder, Julie DNP, PhD, RN
  2. Elamin, Fatima MDA
  3. Mayes, Eric AS Arch
  4. Cox, Lauren BA(c)
  5. Martin, Elaine MA
  6. Webel, Allison R. PhD, RN, FAAN

Abstract

Context: African American and Hispanic adults share a disproportionate burden of HIV infections in the United States but continue to experience suboptimal uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Increasing PrEP accessibility in nontraditional care settings is a potential strategy to increase PrEP uptake in these high-risk groups. PrEP implementation in local health departments (LHDs) is not well characterized.

 

Objective: To evaluate HIV PrEP implementation for African American and Hispanic adults receiving medical care in Virginia's LHDs.

 

Design: We conducted a retrospective, mixed-methods evaluation of PrEP services implementation at LHDs completing their first PrEP program year between June 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019. Using pharmacy records, we estimated PrEP coverage and adherence using PrEP to need ratios (PnRs) and medication possession ratios (MPRs), respectively. Thematic analysis was used to identify barriers to PrEP delivery in interviews with 6 multidisciplinary LHD workers.

 

Results: Of the 433 PrEP clients receiving an emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Truvada) prescription in year 1, 52.0% self-identified as African American and 8.9% self-identified as Hispanic. PnRs were greater for White adults in 50.0% of clinics. The average MPR (0.79) was consistent with protective medication adherence levels; however, 25.0% of clients filled only one prescription in the program year. Qualitative findings suggest incompatibilities between health PrEP services delivery and community preferences for African American and Hispanic adults; however, LHDs in one health region were able to link communities of color to PrEP at similar rates as Whites.

 

Conclusions: Incorporating a metric sensitive to racial/ethnic differences in the burden of HIV infection improved recognition of PrEP disparities; however, population-specific targets are needed to enhance use of the PnR for program evaluation. Tailoring of PrEP services to communities with the greatest local PrEP burden may be needed to optimize the effectiveness of PrEP programs in LHDs.