Evidence-Based Practice Network

Show Me The Evidence

The Blog of Lippincott's Evidence-Based Practice Network


Systematic Review
This blog post is reposted from NursingCenter's In the Round.

During my days of nursing school and research classes, we did literature reviews to determine relevant research surrounding a topic of interest. While we did learn about ensuring that studies in our literature reviews were solid, with appropriate sample, design, methods, etc., we didn’t actually compare the findings from the studies with the same intensity that we do today.

A recent webinar about evidence-based practice (EBP) really cleared up some concepts and terms for me, including the importance of using systematic reviews when examining evidence. A systematic review is an essential component for basing change in practice on current evidence. So how does a systematic review differ from a literature review?
  • Peer review is a critical part of the process. A systematic review looks at evidence reported in peer-reviewed journals and the systematic review itself is peer-reviewed.
  • The evidence is rigorously reviewed, using the same manner and standards that were used to produce the evidence.
We know that changing practice based on one research study is not enough. It’s not even enough to change nursing practice based on several studies. Available evidence must be investigated and interpreted using scientific review methods. A well-conducted systematic review summarizes existing research, defines the boundaries of what is known and what is not known, and helps resolve inconsistencies among diverse pieces of research evidence (Duffy, 2005).

Here’s a good example of a systematic review from the October issue of American Journal of Nursing. As you read Deactivation of ICDs at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practices and Provider and Patient Attitudes, pay particular attention to Table 1 where the sample, methods, and findings of each study are summarized.

References

Duffy, M. (2005). Using Research to Advance Nursing Practice: Systematic Reviews: Their Role and Contribution to Evidence-based Practice. Clinical Nurse Specialist: The Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice, 15-17.

Woods, A. (2011). Implementing Evidence Into Practice. Webinar. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.




Posted by Lisa Morris Bonsall on 11/16/2011 8:46:50 PM with 1 comments

Trackback URL: http://www.nursingcenter.com/evidencebasedpracticenetwork/trackback/1358e951-14ab-4ff3-8918-a11e19c12f32/Systematic-Review.aspx?culture=en-US

Comments
eliza
I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this site. I have saved this webpage and I truly intend on visiting the site in the upcoming days. Keep up the excellent work!
12/20/2011 10:48:39 PM

Leave comment Subscribe



 Security code

Latest blog comments

11/8/2011
Beth Truex
I am wondering what the Evidence-Based Practice is now for ...

11/13/2011
Jeu de grattage
Excellent post, merci pour le partage. De plus, votre site ...

11/14/2011
Serap Unsar
I know the latest evidence based nursing practices Thank y...

11/18/2011
Patsy Cain
I want to know more about this

12/20/2011
eliza
I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this...

1/5/2012
Kris
Very interesting and sobering blog post. I have always want...

1/5/2012
Rhellen Macaroy
I love this, I am excited for every topic/subject.

1/17/2012
marbre
Thanks for these informations. This is a well written and w...

2/27/2012
Louise Malbon-Reddix
Thank You for this article and the reminder, that we as nur...

2/27/2012
Johanna
Nothing much has changed though. Still the same as spelled ...

|< <  1 2 3   > >|

About your comments

We welcome comments, discussion, curiosity, and debate. Let us know about your nursing lives and personal experiences. We reserve the right to moderate comments that are intended to sell something or that are inappropriate or hostile.

Disclaimer

Views expressed on this blog are solely those of the authors or persons quoted. They do not necessarily reflect Lippincott's NursingCenter.com's views or those of Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.