Reconstructive Department: MROC Study: Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium
Susan Lamp BSN, RN, CPSN

$3.95
Plastic Surgical Nursing
June 2012 
Volume 32  Number 2
Pages 69 - 70
 
  PDF Version Available!

ABSTRACT
The American Cancer Society estimates that 211,240 women in the United States were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005. Many of these women will receive mastectomy as their primary treatment. For those women undergoing mastectomy, the impact on body image, psychological well-being, and quality of life can be devastating. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy can significantly lessen these adverse effects.Over the last decade, practice patterns in breast reconstruction have undergone significant evolution. A new generation of microsurgical free tissue transfers, called perforator flaps, has been used for mastectomy reconstruction. While many of these microvascular techniques may offer significant benefits, the technical complexity of perforator flaps has limited their use to a minority of centers. Most plastic surgeons continue to rely on conventional TRAM (transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous) flaps and expander/implant techniques as their preferred options for breast reconstruction. Few published outcome studies have provided generalized data to support evidence-based decision making for these procedures.On February 1, 2012, a new 5-year prospective study was launched to compare long-term outcomes for seven commonly used options for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. The abstract states that well-designed studies comparing the current choices from the patient's point of view are difficult to come by. Although the project will use a variety of assessments, it will rely primarily on patient-reported outcome measures in comparing reconstructive options. Previous research has also failed to include race as an important variable. In addition, costs of breast reconstruction procedures will be assessed. While the newer surgical options offer the promise of better outcomes, these techniques require greater technical skill and (perhaps) more resources, compared with traditional expander/implant and pedicle TRAM options.As recognized leaders in the field

Purchase Now !

To purchase this item, follow the instructions below. If you’re not already logged in, be sure to enter your login information below to ensure that your item is saved to your File Drawer after you purchase it.

Not a member? Join now for Free!


Cost:$3.95
1) If you're not already logged in, enter your information below to save this item in your File Drawer for future viewing.

User name:


Password


Forgot your user name or password?
2)  If you have a coupon or promotional code, enter it
here.(If not, just click Continue.


Digital Coupon: (optional)

3)  Click Continue to go to the next screen, where
you'll enter your payment details.






jQuery UI Accordion - Default functionality

For life-long learning and continuing professional development, come to Lippincott's NursingCenter.

 
DNA.jpg      ASPSN.jpg
Nursing Jobs Plus
Featured Jobs
Recommended CE Articles Recommended Nursing Articles

Meeting the Needs of Family Members of ICU Patients
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, October/December 2014
Free access will expire on December 22, 2014.


Dealing with the specter of phantom limb pain
Nursing2014 , November 2014
Free access will expire on December 8, 2014.


The Power of Nursing Peer Review
JONA: Journal of Nursing Administration, November 2014
Free access will expire on December 8, 2014.


More Recommended Articles

Subscribe to Recommended Articles

Evidence Based Practice Skin Care Network NursingCenter Quick Links What’s Trending Events