1. Kennedy, Maureen Shawn MA, RN, FAAN, AJN Editor-in-Chief


Updated several times a week with posts by a wide variety of authors, AJN's blog Off the Charts allows us to provide more timely-and often more personal-perspectives on professional, policy, and clinical issues. Best of the Blog will be a regular column to draw the attention of AJN readers to posts we think deserve a wider audience. To read more, please visit:


Article Content

Editor's note: This post was originally published on July 12, 2011, and cites articles published that year. Although more attention is now being paid to this patient safety concern, nurses should always be alert, especially with new clinicians, be they physicians, nurses, or others, who interact with patients.


Last week, a post on the New York Times Well blog ( discussed whether mortality rates in hospitals are worse during July when new interns and residents begin their clinical training. It described findings from three studies, before finally concluding, "Though the debate continues, most studies have not found a spike in hospital mortality rates in July."


It was common thinking in hospitals when I worked clinically-"Never be sick enough to have to go to a hospital the first two weeks of July, and NEVER, EVER need surgery during that time"-and I'd venture that many people still believe it, despite what studies may report. (And, as I write, I see that ABC News is reporting on a new review of 39 studies, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, that does support the existence of the "July effect." See


I remember working in the ED when the new residents on call would come to see patients, their "whites" impeccably spotless and starched, with new blank index cards in their pockets, looking eager and anxious to finally be getting to the real work of their profession. By mid-August, they all seemed a bit haggard, the whites rumpled and the pockets torn a bit, bulging with notes-filled index cards clipped together, tourniquets and empty blood tubes, and the Merck Manual-and usually with a big stain from a leaky Bic pen.


There seemed to be two kinds of new residents: first, there were those who recognized that they were new to this world and that experienced nurses had a lot of knowledge about hands-on care, clinical technology, and how to get things done in a hospital bureaucracy-these were the men and women who truly wanted to learn and do right by their patients.


And then there were the "others"-those who felt (or at least acted) the opposite. For these, it was all about the title and prestige and insisting they be addressed as "Dr. ____." These residents scared us-these were the ones who often got into trouble because they wouldn't ask for help. I recall on more than one occasion waking up a sleepy second-year resident and telling him we really, really needed him to come to the ED.


The Times article notes this caveat about most research on the topic: "Some researchers say looking at surgical residents and outcomes for severely ill patients obscures the [July] effect, since surgical residents are often part of a team and patients with the most serious conditions receive more attention." I agree, as most of those patients will be under the careful scrutiny of nurses in the early postoperative period or in an ICU.


I don't think one can realistically evaluate the "July effect" without considering the "nurse effect."