Authors

  1. Engberg, Sandra
  2. Clapper, Jynae
  3. McNichol, Laurie
  4. Thompson, Donna
  5. Welch, Valre W.
  6. Gray, Mikel

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to summarize evidence related to adherence to intermittent catheterization (IC), complication rates, satisfaction with IC, and its effect on health-related quality of life.

 

PROBLEM: Intermittent catheterization is frequently used to manage lower urinary tract dysfunctions including urinary retention and urinary incontinence, but research suggests that care for patients using IC may not always be based on evidence.

 

METHODS: Scoping review.

 

SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL databases, and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews to identify studies published between January 2009 and March 2019. Seventy studies met inclusion criteria and were evaluated for adherence, complication rates, satisfaction, and health-related quality in adults and children using IC for bladder management.

 

FINDINGS: Recent research was variable in both quantity and quality. The evidence suggests that (1) most patients can successfully master IC and that functional status is likely the most important predictor of success; (2) adherence to IC probably decreases over time; (3) urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common complication of IC and that prophylactic antibiotic therapy may reduce the risk of recurrent UTIs; (4) urinary incontinence is also a common complication; and (5) other complications such as urethral strictures, bladder stones, hematuria, and urethral false passage do occur but are less prevalent than UTIs and incontinence between catheterizations. Our review also revealed multiple gaps in the evidence to support care for patients using IC.

 

CONCLUSIONS: Research priorities include a need for prospective studies of the epidemiology and risk factors for IC-related complications, along with intervention studies to determine how to improve outcomes for patients using IC to manage bladder function.

 

Article Content

INTRODUCTION

Urinary catheters have been used for more than 3500 years to drain the bladder when it fails to empty.1 Intermittent catheterization (IC) mimics normal bladder function by allowing the bladder to fill and then emptying it completely via regular insertion of a catheter that is removed when the bladder is drained of urine. Intermittent catheterization was employed on a limited basis during World War II using strict sterile technique that significantly limited its uptake in clinical practice. Lapides revolutionized IC by demonstrating its safe application using clean rather than sterile technique. This innovation led to widespread use of this intervention in the management of patients with urinary retention with or without urinary incontinence.

 

While IC has been shown to be effective for many patients with incomplete bladder emptying, a recent cross-sectional study of 210 nurses based in the United States who regularly teach IC as part of their daily practice found that almost two-thirds (66%) do not base their practice on clinical guidelines.2 Many who reported using guidelines for IC identified guidelines focusing on assessment and management of indwelling rather than IC. Results also indicated significant variability in approaches to teaching IC including who should be taught the procedure (patient and significant other) and catheter selection (length and size).

 

Based on gaps in knowledge and evidence in this important nurse-led intervention, we conducted a scoping review and summarized evidence related to use of IC for (1) ability to perform IC, (2) adherence to IC, (3) satisfaction with IC, (4) its effect on health-related quality of life (QoL), and (5) development of complications.

 

METHODS

We selected the framework promulgated by Arksey and O'Malley3 to guide the review. Based on this framework, we identified aims of our review, searched and retrieved potentially relevant studies, selected pertinent studies based on our aims and inclusion/exclusion criteria, extracted and charted data from these studies, and collated, summarized, and reported results in this article.

 

Study Identification

The literature search focused on articles published between January 2009 and March 2019. The start date for the review was selected based on the change in United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid policy coverage for IC from reusable catheters to single-use catheters. The search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews. These databases were selected to be comprehensive and to reflect a range of disciplines. Searches were conducted by a reference librarian who used a combination of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and free text terms provided by all of the authors. The terms used were intermittent urethral catheterization, urinary catheterization, intermittent catheterization, clean intermittent catheterization, sterile intermittent catheterization, self-catheterization, intermittent self-catheterization, urinary bladder, neurogenic, and spinal cord injuries. The search terms were adapted for each database. The reference lists of relevant studies were hand-searched to identify additional studies that met inclusion criteria.

 

Study Selection

Records were eligible for inclusion if they reported results of a quantitative research study (intervention or observational designs) or a systematic review with meta-analysis and if one of the following outcomes in relation to IC were reported: urinary incontinence, complications such as urinary tract infection (UTI) and hematuria, adherence/compliance to catheterization, health-related QoL, comfort/discomfort/pain, or satisfaction with IC. Studies were excluded if they were not published in English, did not report results separately for patients using IC, reported findings of a systematic review that did not include meta-analysis of pooled data (we nevertheless searched the reference lists of these reviews to identify additional potentially eligible studies), or the full-text article was not available.

 

A 2-stage screening process was used to determine study inclusion. All of the authors divided into pairs and reviewed each identified record. During stage 1, the title and the abstract were screened using the eligibility criteria. If either reviewer judged the article to be potentially eligible, it moved to stage 2, full-text review. During stage 2, both reviewers had to agree on the eligibility of the study and if excluded, the reason for exclusion. Any conflicts were resolved by discussion.

 

Data Extraction

During a face-to-face meeting of all authors, data were extracted from the included studies and summarized following group consensus about the study characteristics and findings. The data extracted were setting, sample, outcome(s), method used to measure the outcome, the comparison group (if applicable), and the findings. Findings were categorized by outcome.

 

RESULTS

Database searches identified 2256 records and 12 additional records were identified by reviewing the reference lists of studies included in the review. After duplicate records were removed, the titles and abstracts of 2248 records were reviewed and 2002 were excluded. Two hundred forty-six underwent full-text review and 71 articles reporting the results of 70 studies (1 study reported results in 2 articles) met the eligibility criteria (Figure). These studies examined predictors of ability to self-catheterize, adherence to IC, adverse events associated with IC including UTIs, urethral strictures, hematuria, bladder stones, false passage, discomfort, urinary incontinence, renal scarring, satisfaction with IC, and QoL in individuals using IC. The studies were conducted in multiple countries, used a variety of research designs, and included a variety of patient groups.

  
Figure. PRISMA flowc... - Click to enlarge in new windowFigure. PRISMA flowchart of the study selection, screening, and inclusion.

Ability to Self-catheterize

Four studies examined the patient's ability to self-catheterize and characteristics associated with successful mastery of this skill (Table 1). One study examined the ability of children with spina bifida 3 years or older to perform self-catheterization.4 Forty-eight percent (48%) of participants were able to self-catheterize. Two factors, male sex and higher levels of independence in activities of daily living increased the likelihood of mastering self-catheterization. In contrast, having a thoracic lesion and intellectual disability (among children 5 years or older) decreased the likelihood of success in performing self-catheterization.

  
Table 1 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 1. Predictors of Ability to Perform Self-intermittent Catheterization

Three studies examined adult patients' ability to perform self-catheterization. Participants in one study were 65 years and older and used IC for a variety of reasons while the second study evaluated 23 participants with neurogenic bladder dysfunction caused by multiple sclerosis (MS).5,7 In both studies, more than 80% of participants were able to self-catheterize and functional ability was a significant predictor of success. Better cognitive function predicted success in the study of older adults where the mean age was 74 years,5 but it did not predict success in self-catheterization in the study that enrolled patients with MS where the mean age was 46 years.7 In a study of 391 individuals being taught IC for a variety of indications, Parsons and colleagues6 compared the proportion of males and females who were successful in mastering the procedure. They found that 88% of males and 76% of females were successful in performing IC.

 

Adherence to Intermittent Catheterization

Sixteen studies that examined adherence to IC were conducted in a variety of settings and varied in sample sizes and times frames over which adherence was measured (Table 2). Four studies (n = 41-3328 patients) examined adherence in patients using IC following spinal cord injuries. Reported adherence rates varied from 57.7% (n = 104 patients followed up a mean of 4.5 years) to 91.8% (n = 49 patients, follow-up time not reported).8,9,16,19 The largest study to examine adherence to IC used data extracted from the National Spinal Cord Injury Database in the United States in which adherence at 1-year following discharge from postinjury rehabilitation reported 78.6% of a group of 3328 participants were still using IC.19 In this study, the only significant predictors of continued use of IC American Spinal Injury Association classes C versus A (P = .003) and D versus A (P = .008) impairment. Classes C and D spinal cord injuries are historically referred to as incomplete; both are characterized by preservation of motor function below the neurologic injury level with variable levels of muscle weakness. In contrast, a class A (complete) level spinal cord injury is characterized by loss of motor and sensory function below the neurologic injury level.20

  
Table 2 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 2. Adherence and Continuation of Intermittent Catheterization

We identified 5 studies that examined adherence to IC in samples of adults with varying types of lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction requiring IC.6,10,14,15 Adherence was measured for a period between 6 weeks and 66 months; reported adherence rates varied from 52.7% in a group of 27 patients followed up from a mean of 23.5 months10 to 84% in a group of 391 participants followed up for 6 weeks.6 Three studies measured adherence at 12 months. Two reported similar adherence rates of 51.2% (n = 129) and 58% (n = 60).12,14 In 1 of these studies, the authors reported that 50% of the patients who stopped IC did so because it was no longer indicated.12 In a third study (n = 169), Hentzen and colleagues15 reported a much higher adherence rate of 89.9%, but the study was limited to patients with a continued indication for IC such as neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

 

Parsons and colleagues6 compared adherence rates in males versus females and in older versus younger adults (>=65 vs <65 years). A higher percentage of men (88%) than women (76%) were adherent 6 weeks after being taught to perform IC. Adherence rates were similar in those 65 years and older and younger than 65 years, 86% and 82%, respectively. Hentzen and colleagues15 also compared adherence rates in patients older than 65 years and younger than 65 years and reported that those older than 65 years were significantly less likely to be adherent at 1-month follow-up (P < .001) but not at 6 to 12 months (P = .38). Two of the 5 studies in this group examined characteristics associated with adherence in multivariate analysis. In 1, males with nonneurogenic bladder dysfunction who were older than 60 years were less adherent to IC (P = .003), while females with neurogenic bladder dysfunction who were younger than 40 years were the most adherent group (P = .04).14 Hentzen's group15 identified no statistically significant predictors of adherence among participants older than 65 years.

 

Three studies were found that examined adherence to IC in individuals with MS. Adherence rates were 95.6% (mean follow-up = 9.3 months), 29% (mean follow-up varied with adherent patients followed a mean of 100.7 months) and 60% (at 3-month follow-up).7,11,17 The sample sizes in all 3 studies were small (n = 20-35). Although 2 of the studies examined bivariate relationships between select characteristics and adherence to IC (Table 2),7,17 neither performed the multivariate analyses essential to determine which characteristics were independently associated with IC adherence.

 

We only identified 2 studies examining adherence to IC in children; they were conducted in France (n = 60) and Saudi Arabia (n = 44). Participants had varying reasons for IC and were followed up for a variable period; reported adherence rates were 77% (follow-up of at least 2 years) and 82% (mean follow-up of 9.9 years).13,18

 

Satisfaction With Intermittent Catheterization

We retrieved 7 studies that examined participants' satisfaction with IC (Table 3).10,21-26 All evaluated adults performing IC and were conducted in a variety of countries. Only 2 examined satisfaction with IC regardless of catheter type. Both measured satisfaction on a 10-point scale, with higher scores representing greater satisfaction. They reported mean satisfaction scores of 6.0 (n = 27)10 and 7.86 (n = 269) out of 10.26 The remaining studies compared satisfaction with different types of catheters. One study compared hydrophilic (HC) to noncoated catheters (NC) with participants randomly assigned to the catheter type. Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in the group (n = 45) using HCs (mean score of 9.3 on a 0- to 10-point scale) compared to the group (n = 69) using NC (mean score 8.6) (P = .007).21 Another study (n = 21) compared satisfaction scores with polyvinyl chloride (PVC), hydrophilic-coated, and gel-lubricated nonhydrophilic catheters with participants randomly assigned to the order of catheter use and using each type of catheter for 6 weeks. Satisfaction scores were highest when participants were using the gel-lubricated catheter.25 A third study (n = 195) compared satisfaction with PVC and PVC-free catheters and reported no significant differences.24 The final 2 studies compared compact catheters to standard length catheters.22,23 There was no significant difference in satisfaction scores in 1 on the studies (n = 125),22 and while the difference was statistically significant (P = .04) in the second study (n = 118), the actual difference in scores was small, 77 versus 71 on a 100-mm scale, respectively, for the compact versus standard length catheter.23

  
Table 3 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 3. Satisfaction With Intermittent Catheterization

Quality of Life

Table 4 summarizes the findings of the 15 studies that examined health-related QoL in patients using IC. Quality of life was measured in a variety of patient samples using IC secondary to neurogenic and nonneurogenic causes of bladder dysfunction. The instruments used to measure QoL varied across studies. Four studies examined the effect of initiating IC on QoL and reported improvement of urinary-related QoL.11,12,26,31 Kessler and associates (n = 92)32 also examined IC-related QoL in relation to ease of insertion, interference with work or other activities, and pain and reported that most participants rated their QoL positively in relation to each of these domains. Three studies examined characteristics associated with poor urinary-specific and/or general health-related QoL. Chiappe and colleagues29 examined the relationship between a variety of characteristics and bladder-specific and general health-related QoL in 119 patients using IC. While a history of UTI and urinary incontinence were significantly related to bladder-specific QoL on bivariate analysis, multivariate analysis revealed no characteristics that exerted a significant effect of QoL. Kessler and associates32 reported that the only predictor of poor QoL was severe pain while performing IC odds ratio (OR) = 20.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 to 259.9; P = .02. Girotti and coworkers14 (n = 60) reported that patients who were adherent to IC had better overall QoL in psychological (P = .04) and social relationships (P = .02) domains than were nonadherent patients.

  
Table 4 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 4. Intermittent Catheterization: Quality of Life

Several studies compared QoL in patients using IC to those using a variety of other methods of bladder evacuation. In 2 studies (n = 1193 and 42), QoL did not differ significantly by bladder-emptying methods.30,34 In 2 studies (n = 195 and 142), patients with spinal cord injuries who voided spontaneously reported better QoL than those who used IC to empty their bladders.27,33 In 1 of these studies, QoL was also compared in participants who self-catheterized and those whose IC was performed by a caregiver and reported that caregiver IC was associated with worse QoL in most domains compared to other bladder management methods.27

 

We found only 1 study that evaluated the effect of IC on QoL in children with urethral sensation. Alencar and colleagues28 compared urethral (n = 51) and continent urinary stoma (n = 19) catheterization and reported that urethral catheterization was associated with significantly worse QoL in physical and social domains than stoma catheterization.

 

Two studies compared QoL in patients using shorter (sometimes referred to as compact) catheters versus catheters of regular length; both employed a randomized cross-over trial design. In 1 (n = 118), use of the compact catheter was associated with significantly better IC-specific QoL compared to the standard catheter (P < .001).23 In the other study (n = 125), use of the compact catheter was associated with significantly better general QoL related to daily activities (P = .03), but not in overall QoL (P value not reported).22

 

Only 1 study was identified that examined the effect of an intervention on QoL in patients using IC. Wilde and colleagues35 completed a single-group, pre-/poststudy in patients using IC following spinal cord injuries (n = 26). The intervention was a web-based self-management program; it did not result in a significant improvement in IC-related QoL.

 

Complications

Our search revealed a variety or potential complications associated with IC. These included UTI, urethral strictures, hematuria, bladder stones, false urethral passage, pain or discomfort, and renal scarring.

 

Urinary Tract Infections

Urinary tract infection was the most commonly studied IC complication. We retrieved 13 studies that reported UTI rates in patients using IC. The method used to diagnose a UTI varied as did the time frame over which UTIs were assessed (Table 5). In 3 studies, participants were adults with neurogenic bladder dysfunction secondary to a spinal cord injury8,16,41 while 4 studies evaluated UTI in patients with neurogenic and nonneurogenic LUT disorders.10,29,36,38 Four studies (n = 104-649) reported the 1-year incidence of UTI, which varied from 62% to 77%.8,29,38,41 Two studies reported the number of UTIs over a 1-year period; both reported similar rates (2.6 and 2.7).29,41 Woodbury and associates41 compared the annual prevalence of UTIs in males and females and reported significantly more UTIs in females versus males (3.2 vs 2.4, P < .05). In contrast, Batista-Miranda and coworkers10 reported that more males than females had a UTI during a longitudinal study with a mean follow-up of 23.5 months.

  
Table 5 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 5. Intermittent Catheterization and Urinary Tract Infections

Four studies examined the occurrence of UTIs in children with LUT dysfunction managed by IC. Faleiros and colleagues37 evaluated a group of 94 children with myelomeningocele and neurogenic bladder and compared the number of UTI episodes during the year prior to and following the initiation of IC and reported that the mean number decreased from 2.8 to 1.1. Li and colleagues39 compared the incidence of UTI in children with neurogenic bladders (n = 78) who had IC initiated prior to 1 year of age (early IC adopters) and after 3 years of age (late IC adopters). At both 3 and 6 years of follow-up, a significantly higher proportion classified as late IC adopters experienced UTIs (38.9% and 52.8%, respectively) when compared to early IC adopters (15.0% and 25.0%, respectively).39 Uyar and colleagues40 (n = 462) reported that IC was a significant independent risk factor for UTI secondary to extended [beta]-lactamase-producing bacteria (OR = 2.70, 95% CI, 1.25-5.84). Yildiz and colleagues42 (n = 71) reported that 21% of children with myelodysplasia using IC had symptomatic UTIs (time frame not reported). Most of the children (84.5%) in this study were being treated with prophylactic antibiotics.26

 

We identified 5 studies43-47 conducted in adults that compared the incidence or prevalence of UTI in IC to other bladder-emptying methods (n = 110-1104). Four of the 5 were conducted in adults with neurogenic bladder dysfunction following spinal cord injury.43,45-47 With the exception of 1 study,45 UTIs were more common in patients using IC than among spontaneous voiders. Singh and colleagues45 compared UTIs per 100 patient days and reported similar rates for IC (0.34) and normal voiding (0.32).

 

We identified 5 studies that compared UTI rates in patients using IC versus indwelling catheters. Anderson and colleagues43 evaluated 344 spinal cord-injured adults and reported no significant differences (P = .82) in adjusted incidence rates of UTIs among patients managed with IC versus indwelling urethral catheters. The findings of this study differ from the 3 studies that reported UTIs were more common in patients with indwelling catheters than those using IC.45-47 Two studies compared the incidence of UTIs in IC and reflex voiding (a bladder management strategy where males with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia spontaneously void into a condom catheter). In both studies, UTI rates were higher in patients managed by reflex voiding into a condom catheter; unfortunately, neither study reported whether the differences were statistically significant.45,46 The 4 studies comparing UTI rates in patients using IC and those voiding spontaneously all reported higher rates in the IC group.43,44,46,47

 

We retrieved 8 studies that compared UTI rates based on the type of catheter being used for IC.21,24,25,48-52 Six compared HCs to NCs.21,48-51 Three of the studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 45-224) and 2 of them reported no significant differences in UTI occurrences in patients using HCs versus NCs.21,48 In contrast, 1 study in children reported significantly fewer UTIs per person year in the HC group compared to the NC group.49 We also identified 3 systematic reviews with meta-analysis that compared UTIs in patients (not restricted to adults) using HC and NC. Meta-analysis of pooled data from 1 systematic review found no significant differences in UTI rates.51 This finding differed from the other 2 meta-analyses that reported the odds of experiencing a UTI were significantly lower in the HC group compared to the NC group.50,52

 

We retrieved 10 studies (n = 22-361) that evaluated the influence of prophylactic (suppressive) antibiotic use on UTI rates.53-62 We found variability in the antibiotic regimen and method of administration limiting our ability to compare findings across studies (Table 5). Three studies examined the effect of continuous prophylactic antibiotic therapy in adults using IC. Two compared UTIs in adults with a history of IC use and recurrent UTIs; participants were randomized to a prophylactic antibiotic or no antibiotic group.56,59 Both reported significantly lower UTI occurrences in the group receiving prophylactic antibiotics. In the third study, all participants using IC were treated with prophylactic antibiotics for 6 months; 14% of patients using IC had a symptomatic UTI during treatment.55

 

We identified 2 studies that evaluated the effect of discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics therapy in children. There was no significant difference in UTI rates in 1 study,53 while the rate was significantly higher in the discontinuation group in the other study.62 Two studies examined the effect of weekly cyclic antibiotic therapy (WCA) on UTI rates. One study was conducted in adults with a history of spinal cord injury and compared UTI rates before and after initiating WCA. There was a significant reduction in UTIs following initiation of WCA.60 The other study evaluated WCA in pregnant females using IC for neurogenic or nonneurogenic causes of bladder dysfunction. Analysis revealed significantly fewer UTIs in the WCA group than in the non-WCA group.58

 

We identified 2 studies that evaluated the effect of prophylactic antibiotic bladder instillations of UTI rates.54,57 One study, conducted in adults, compared rates prior to and following initiation of gentamicin instillations and reported a significant reduction in UTIs.54 The other study was conducted in a pediatric sample and reported a significant reduction in the UTIs following initiation of neomycin-polymyxin or gentamicin bladder instillations.57

 

The final study in this group examined the effect of a 5-day course of antibiotics on cure, relapse, and reinfection rates in patients using IC following spinal cord injury. While cure rates were high, by week 9 posttreatment, the relapse or reinfection rates were 50% and average posttreatment UTI-free days were 53.7.61

 

Four studies examined the effects of nonantibiotic-based interventions on UTI rates (Table 5). Prasad and colleagues63 examined the effect of a urinary catheter preinoculated with Escherichia coli 83972 (inserted for 3 days and then removed) on bladder colonization and, among patients who were successfully colonized, on UTI rates. Eight of 13 patients were successfully colonized and during colonization the UTI rate/patient year was reduced from 2.27 to 0.77. In a systematic review with meta-analysis comparing aseptic and clean technique during catheter insertion, there was no significant difference in the incidence of UTI.51 Wilde and colleagues35 examined the effect of a web-based self-management intervention on UTI rates in 26 adults with a history of spinal cord injury. While fewer participants (n = 7, 30%) reported having a UTI in the 3 months following the intervention compared to the 3 months prior to the intervention (n = 11, 42%), the difference was not statistically significant. The last study in this group compared the effect of a combined antimuscarinic and bowel management regimen (intervention group) versus an antimuscarinic-only regimen in decreasing the rates of UTI over 12 months. The sample comprised 72 children with spina bifida and urodynamic confirmed neurogenic overactive bladder with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia and constipation. The rate of UTIs decreased significantly more in the intervention group (from a mean of 3.2 to 0.03) than in the control group (from a mean of 3.1 to 1.1).64

 

Urethral Stricture

The relationship of IC and urethral stricture is complex. Repeated in-and-out (1-time) catheterization may be used to maintain urethral patency in patients with a urethral stricture. However, the act of repeated catheterization also may result in inflammation and formation of secondary urethral strictures.65 Our scoping review focused on formation of secondary urethral strictures in patients using IC to manage LUT dysfunction.

 

We identified 4 studies that examined the development of secondary urethral strictures in patients using IC to manage bladder dysfunction (Table 6).45,65-67 Two studies measured the incidence of strictures. Batista-Miranda and colleagues10 investigated 27 patients using IC secondary to neurogenic and nonneurogenic causes of bladder dysfunction and reported that 16.7% developed strictures over the mean 23.5 months of follow-up. In a study of 333 adults with a history of spinal cord injury, 4.2% (all males) developed a urethral stricture a mean of 19.8 months after starting IC.67 Greenwell and associates66 examined the incidence of recurrent strictures in patients who did (n = 31) and did not (n = 95) use IC during follow-up (mean = 25 months). Recurrence rates were similar in the 2 groups, 42% of patients using IC and 49% of those who did not (P = .46). Krebs and coworkers65 compared the incidence of strictures in males who used IC (n = 415) versus other bladder evacuation methods (n = 629) and reported that a significantly higher percentage of patients using IC (25%) than those using other methods (trigger reflex voiding, suprapubic catheter, physiologic voiding, suprapubic catheterization, abdominal straining, spontaneously voiding, sacral anterior root stimulation, or indwelling catheter) to empty their bladder (14%) developed strictures (P = .0001). Singh and colleagues45 reported that strictures were significantly less common when IC was used (n = 180) than when patients were managed by an indwelling urethral catheter (n = 224, P = .04).

  
Table 6 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 6. Urethral Stricture, Hematuria, Bladder Stones, False Passages, and Intermittent Catheterization

Hematuria

Nine studies examined hematuria in individuals using IC to manage bladder emptying; all but one was conducted in adult participants (Table 6).21,36,38,45,49,50,52,68,69 We identified 2 studies that reported the prevalence of hematuria. Both studies enrolled participants with various indications for IC; 1 (n = 391) reported a low prevalence rate (2.2% annually) among individuals using HCs.38 In contrast, participants in the other study (n = 44) used a variety of catheter types and reported a hematuria prevalence rate of 23%; the time frame for this measurement was not reported.36 Singh and colleagues45 compared rates of hematuria in patients using IC to patients (n = 180) with indwelling urethral catheters (n = 224). Significantly fewer of the patients using IC (4%) than patients with indwelling catheters (12%) had hematuria (P = .005).

 

The remaining studies compared hematuria in patients using different types of catheters for IC. Two were RCTs and 2 were systematic reviews with meta-analysis that compared HCs and NCs. One of the RCTs measured microhematuria during hospitalization in an inpatient rehabilitation unit and reported that significantly fewer of the dipstick tests were positive in the HC group (23% of n = 79) than in the NC group (n = 34% of n = 82) (P < .0001).21 The other study examined self-reported hematuria in children using HCs (n = 37) and NCs (n = 41) and reported no hematuria in either group.49 One of the systematic reviews reported a significant reduction in the odds of hematuria in subjects using HCs (n = 230) versus NCs (n = 232), OR = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.35-0.92).50 In contrast, the other systematic review found no significant differences in the risk of hematuria in subjects using HCs (n = 247) versus NCs (n = 258).52 In a small study (n = 36) comparing compact and standard length catheters in males with a history of spinal cord injury, 2 patients in the compact group experienced hematuria compared to none in the standard length catheter group.68 In an RCT using a single-group, cross-over design (n = 104), comparing hematuria when patients used PVC and PVC-free catheters, 4% of patients experienced hematuria when using the PVC-free catheter compared to 10% when using PVC catheter (significance was not reported).69

 

Bladder Stones

We identified 5 studies that investigated the incidence of bladder stones in patients using IC (Table 6). Bartel and colleagues70 compared the occurrence of stones in patients using different methods to empty their bladder. Two percent of patients using IC had bladder stones documented on endoscopy or imaging studies. This rate was lower than patients managed with suprapubic catheters (11%) and indwelling urethral catheters (6.6%). In contrast, the rate of bladder stones in patients managed with IC was slightly higher than that documented in males managed by reflex voiding into a condom catheter (1.1%). The time to occurrence of stones was also much longer in patients using IC (mean = 116 months) compared to suprapubic (mean = 59 months) and indwelling urethral (mean = 31 months) catheters.70 The remaining 4 studies reported the rates of bladder stones only in patients using IC. Hakansson and associates38 reported an annual rate of bladder stones was .6%. The other 3 studies reported rates between 10% and 28.2%; none reported the time frame over which these stones occurred.16,36,67

 

Urethral False Passage

A false passage in the urethra is formation of an epithelialized tract created when the catheter is inserted against the urethral wall rather than guided through the urethral lumen and into the bladder vesicle.38,45 We identified 2 studies that measured rates of urethral false passage formation (Table 6). Hakansson and colleagues38 reported that 2.2% of the 391 participants reported this complication annually. Singh and colleagues45 evaluated urethral false passage formation in a longitudinal study of patients with neurogenic bladder managed by IC (n = 180) or an indwelling urethral catheter (n = 224); the rate of false passage formation was 5% in the IC group and 4% in the indwelling catheter group.

 

Pain

Table 7 summarizes the findings of the 5 studies that examined pain or discomfort associated with IC.14,35,49,68,69 Girotti and colleagues14 compared self-reported anticipated pain measured prior to initiation of IC and actual pain following initiation of IC (n = 60). Anticipated and actual pain intensity was measured using a 10-point visual analog scale, where 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates worst imaginable pain. The mean anticipated pain scores (mean = 5.47 out of 10) was significantly higher than actual pain scores (mean = 2.34 out of 10). DeFoor and coworkers49 compared pain in patients (n = 36) randomly assigned to use either an HC or NC (participants used both types of catheters and were randomized to the order of use). They found that 3 out of 37 patients (8.1%) in the HC versus 0 out of 41 patients (0%) in the NC group reported pain; this difference was not statistically significant (P = .06). Domurath and colleagues68 compared self-reported pain and stinging in 36 patients using a shorter (compact) versus standard length catheter (both were HC). They found no significant differences in pain intensity with IC. Johansson and coworkers69 compared self-reported discomfort and burning in 134 patients using PVC or PVC-free catheters. The proportion of patients reporting discomfort and burning was higher when catheterizing with the PVC catheter (28% and 23%, respectively) as compared to the PVC-free catheter (14% and 12%, respectively). The remaining study examined the effect of a web-based self-management intervention on self-reported pain related to IC and reported no significant differences in pain scores pre- and postintervention.35

  
Table 7 - Click to enlarge in new windowTABLE 7. Intermittent Catheterization: Pain, Urinary Incontinence, Impaired Upper Urinary Tract Function, and Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Urinary Incontinence

We identified 7 studies that examined urinary incontinence among patients using IC to manage their LUT dysfunction.16,29,35,45,47,64,71 Findings of these studies are summarized in Table 7. Three studies examined the prevalence of urinary incontinence in adults with neurogenic and/or nonneurogenic LUT dysfunction; the rates were 33.0% of 49 patients,16 55.1% of 119 patients,29 and 64.3% of 108 patients,71 respectively. Singh and colleagues45 compared incontinence rates in patients using IC (n = 180) versus an indwelling urethral catheter (n = 224) and reported that a significantly higher proportion of those using IC (8%) reported urinary incontinence than those managed with an indwelling urethral catheter (1%). Incontinence rates among IC users were also compared to males using a condom catheter (n = 45) and showed incontinence was significantly lower in the IC group (8% vs 38%). Stillman and colleagues47 compared the rates of self-reported incontinence occurring at least once monthly in patients using IC (n = 31 and 39) versus patients who retained the ability to void spontaneously (n = 58 and 63). At 3- and 12-months follow-ups, 36% and 44% of patients respectively performing IC reported urinary continence compared to 9% and 16% of those who voided spontaneously. Wilde and colleagues35 reported the proportion of patients (n = 26 at baseline and 20 at 3 months) who reported urinary incontinence prior to participating in a web-based self-management intervention was 89%, which decreased to 74% 3 months postintervention. As described earlier, Radojicic and coworkers72 compared outcomes in a group of 72 children with myelomeningocele and neurogenic bladder dysfunction who were managed by IC and an antimuscarinic or IC and a combined antimuscarinic and structured bowel elimination regimen. They found that the combined regimen was more effective in increasing mean dry intervals than the anticholinergic medication alone (P < .001).

 

Impaired Upper Urinary Tract Function

Evidence concerning the effects of IC on upper urinary tract function is mixed. Based on the pioneering work of Stuart Bauer, children with myelomeningocele may be started on IC before showing signs of upper urinary tract distress such as trabeculation of the bladder wall, ureterohydronephrosis, reduced glomerular filtration rate or serum creatinine, febrile urinary infection or renal scarring in order to prevent these adverse effects.73,74 Two studies conducted in children with spina bifida evaluated renal scarring, comparing the effects of starting IC early (between 1 and 3 months in 1 study and at birth in the other) to starting IC later in life, after signs of upper urinary tract distress.73,74 Elzeneini and colleagues73 compared early-onset IC to IC initiated only when there was a clinical or diagnostic indication that IC was needed. Results showed significantly higher rates of scarring in the late IC group (39.0%) when compared to the early IC group (18.8%).73 In contrast, Woo and associates74 compared early-start IC (1-3 months of age) to IC started at a median age of 5 years. They reported that early-start IC significantly increased the odds of renal scarring (OR = 1.99) when compared to starting IC only when diagnostic findings indicate the need for IC.

 

We identified 2 studies that reported dilation of the ureter or renal pelvis. In addition to comparing UTI rated in children with spina bifida and neurogenic bladders who initiated IC prior to 1 year of age versus those who started IC after 3 years of age, Li and colleagues39 evaluated vesicoureteral reflux, which has been linked to an increased risk of febrile UTI and upper urinary tract scarring, and reported that a higher proportion of children in the late-start IC group had vesicoureteral reflux at both 3 (50%) and 6 (41.7%) months of follow-up as compared to the early-start IC group whose rates were 20.0% and 17.5%, respectively. Lopes and colleagues16 reported that 18.4% of a group of 49 adults with spinal cord injuries and neurogenic bladder dysfunction using IC at the time of data collection had evidence of hydronephrosis or ureteral dilation in imaging.

 

Other Adverse Events

Casey and colleagues75 investigated cases of squamous cell carcinoma in patients using IC. The risk for squamous cell carcinoma is higher in spinal cord-injured patients whose neurogenic bladder dysfunction is managed by indwelling urinary catheterization; however, evidence concerning the risk in patients managed by IC is lacking. In Casey's study, the results of 1 case were combined with 7 others reported in the literature showing the duration of IC prior to diagnosis varied from 4 to 23 years. All patients had a history of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and that most (75%) were females.

 

DISCUSSION

This scoping review examined evidence published between 2009 and 2019 on a variety of intermittent catheterization-related issues. Specifically, we reviewed data from 70 eligible studies (reported in 71 articles) that examined adherence to IC, complication rates, satisfaction with IC, and its effect on health-related QoL. The amount and quality of evidence available for the outcomes was variable. In addition, we found variability in study designs, samples, operational definitions of specific outcomes, methods of measurement, and data collection time frames. This variability often made it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the influence of IC on specific outcomes.

 

The first outcome we examined was adherence to IC. The World Health Organization (WHO) defined adherence as the extent to which a person's behavior corresponds with recommendations from a health care provider.76 As discussed in the WHO document, willingness and ability to learn a self-care skill is essential to adherence. We found only 4 studies that evaluated the individual's ability to perform self-catheterization, and predictors of IC uptake and adherence.4-7 Two studies investigated adults, 1 enrolled adults older than 65 years, and the other enrolled middle-aged adults with MS. Most adult participants were able to learn to self-catheterize. Functional ability emerged as a significant predictor of successfully learning to perform IC in both studies, age did not.5,7

 

We identified a single study that enrolled 200 children with spina bifida (a congenital anomaly associated with profound motor and cognitive effects) in which findings indicated that only 48% of 92 children were able to perform catheterization during the time frame they were followed up. Consistent with the adult samples, functional ability was a significant predictor of ability to successful learn to self-catheterize.4 Faleiros and colleagues77 published a study following completion of this scoping review that evaluated bladder management in 90 adolescents and young adults (age range 13-29 years) with spina bifida and neurogenic bladder dysfunction; participants lived in Brazil (n = 27), Germany (n = 36), or the United States (n = 27). Multivariate analysis revealed that age at which IC was begun was a significant predictor of self IC among participants 18 years or older.

 

A more robust body of research was found (n = 16 studies) that examined adherence to IC over time. Studies were conducted in a variety of countries and target populations and in which adherence was measured primarily by self-report. Nevertheless, the reported time frames over which adherence was measured varied from 6 weeks following successfully learning to perform IC to more than 60 months, making it difficult to compare findings across studies. Based on these studies, adherence appears to decrease over time with rates between 50% and 79% in most studies. Only one of the studies examining adherence rates reported that it was measured only for patients with continued indication for IC.15 In this study the adherence rate at 12 months was 89.9% for patients 65 years and older and 87% for those younger than 65 years. Another study reported that half of the nonadherent patients in their study had stopped because IC was no longer indicated.12 Adherence rates were not reported separately for the patients with a continued indication for catheterization. Other studies did not address whether IC was still indicated when reporting adherence. Based on these data, we recommend that future studies qualify reports of adherence to differentiate persons who stop IC because of changes in LUT function that nullify the need for IC. Clinical experience strongly suggests that a proportion of patients taught IC no longer require IC for bladder management after a period of time. Such changes occur in patients experiencing urinary retention following a surgical procedure. No longer requiring IC also applies to multiple groups of patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Examples include cessation of IC as spinal shock subsides and some patients are able to resume voluntary spontaneous voiding or involuntary reflex voiding, and patients with remitting-relapsing MS whose bladder function changes based on the natural history of this chronic condition.

 

We also found sparse research aimed at identifying predictors of adherence or nonadherence, and we did not identify any studies examining the effect of interventions designed to improve adherence. There is a need for research addressing both of these issues. Finally, we found very little research examining adherence in children and adolescents with LUT dysfunction requiring IC and urgently recommend additional research focusing on adherence in this population.

 

We hypothesize that satisfaction with IC may be a predictor of long-term adherence, but we found little research examining patient satisfaction with this intervention or the characteristics associated with satisfaction. We only identified 2 studies that examined satisfaction in a sample of patients using IC-one was conducted in Spain and one in Turkey. Both reported levels of satisfaction were moderate (mean = 6 and 7.86 out of 10) in both studies.10,26 The remaining studies compared satisfaction with different types of catheters, but sample sizes of these studies were too small to draw definitive conclusions about patient satisfaction in relation to catheter type. There is a need for additional research focusing on patient satisfaction with IC and the characteristics that influence satisfaction including catheter type.

 

We identified 15 studies that examined health-related QoL in patients using IC and all but one focused on adults.28 Our ability to reach conclusions by evaluating results of multiple studies in this area was significantly impaired by the use of a variety of instruments to measure QoL. Evidence suggests that initiation of IC is likely to improve bladder-specific QoL in patients with a variety of problems impairing bladder emptying. Limited research suggests that urinary incontinence, UTIs, pain during catheter insertion, the need for a caregiver to perform the IC, and poorer adherence to IC may predict poor bladder-specific QoL in patients using IC, but additional research is needed to confirm these findings. The number of studies comparing QoL in patients using different methods to empty their bladders was limited and findings varied indicating a need for additional research in this area.

 

Research comparing QoL in patients using compact and standard length catheters was sparse and results were mixed.22,23 We only identified 1 small, single-group quasiexperimental study that examined the effect of any other intervention on QoL and that intervention was not associated with a significant improvement in QoL.35 We recommend additional research examining the effect of interventions on QoL in patients using IC.

 

Evidence related to complications of IC was more robust. The complication examined most often was UTI. While the time frame over which UTI rates were measured varied and was not reported in some studies, evidence suggests that UTIs are common in adult patients using IC. We found limited research examining sex-related differences in UTI rates and findings were mixed. More studies compared UTI rates in IC and other bladder-emptying methods.43,44,47 All of these studies compared IC to spontaneous voiding and most found that UTIs were more common in those using IC.43,47 Unfortunately, the utility of this finding in clinical practice is limited since IC is only indicated in patients who are unable to manage their bladders spontaneously. Evidence also suggests that UTIs are less common in patients with LUT dysfunction managed by indwelling urinary catheters45,47; however, the utility of this difference is more apparent, particularly when patients, caregivers, and providers must choose between the apparent ease of inserting an indwelling catheter versus the greater commitment required for IC. Our search identified 6 studies including 3 systematic reviews with meta-analysis that compared UTI rates in patients using HCs and NCs.21,48,52 While there is some evidence to suggest that HCs may be associated with lower UTI rates, findings were mixed pointing to the need for additional well-designed studies.

 

Ten studies were retrieved that examined the effect of some type of preventive antibiotic therapy on UTI rates.53-62 While, overall, the evidence for effectiveness of continuous prophylactic antibiotics is mixed, there is some evidence to suggest that this therapy may reduce the rate of UTIs. Weekly cyclic antibiotic therapy, a relatively new approach to preventing recurrent UTIs currently undergoing investigation, was reported to significantly reduce the rate of UTIs in 2 studies.58,60 While findings from these studies support the potential benefit of this intervention, both used weak observational designs increasing the likelihood of bias. Well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in preventing recurrent UTIs in patients using IC. There is a registered RCT examining a WCA program on http://ClinicalTrials.gov although no results are posted.78

 

Evidence supporting instillations of antibiotics into the bladder vesicle was sparse. Two studies (1 enrolled adults and 1 enrolled children) were retrieved that reported reductions in symptomatic UTIs.54,57 Our collective experience indicates that the relative lack of research in this area is matched by its comparatively uncommon use in clinical practice. We recommend additional research evaluating not only the efficacy of intravesical instillation of solutions with antimicrobial or antiseptic properties, combined with evaluation of its acceptability to persons managing LUT dysfunction with IC.

 

We identified a single study that evaluated the effect of purposeful colonization of the LUT with E. coli 83972 on reduced symptomatic UTI occurrences.63 We assert that findings from this study, along with studies of vaccinations designed to reduce symptomatic UTI recurrence in persons with normal LUT function,79 should undergo further study, particularly given the rise in multidrug-resistant organisms in clinical medicine combined with the limited availability of newer antibiotics to eradicate these virulent bacterial strains.

 

We found less research examining other complications associated with IC. Five studies of secondary urethral stricture formation in patients using IC were conducted in a variety of countries and the method used to determine the presence of a stricture varied.10,45,65-67 The reported stricture rate varied from 4.2% to 40%. We only identified 2 studies comparing stricture rates in patients using IC versus other bladder emptying methods and their findings were inconsistent.

 

Of the 9 studies examining hematuria, most compared rates in relation to the type of catheter used and most of these compared HCs to NCs (2 RCTs and 2 systematic reviews with meta-analysis), the results were mixed across types of studies.21,36,38,45,49,50,52,68,69 We recommend additional research in examining these complications and potential interventions to prevent them.

 

Evidence concerning formation of bladder stones and urethral false passages was sparse possibly due to the relative scarcity of these adverse side effects of IC. We identified one study that reported a low annual rate of bladder stone formation (0.6%).38 Similarly, rates of urethral false passage formation among patients using IC was 2.2% to 9% annually.38,45

 

Among patients with intact or partially preserved urethral sensation, pain or discomfort during IC may act as a barrier to adoption or adherence. Nevertheless, we found relatively little research examining its prevalence and few intervention trials aimed at alleviating pain with catheterization.14,35,49,68,69 One study suggested the pain that patients experience when performing IC may be less than the magnitude of pain patients anticipate when faced with the need for IC.14 Evidence concerning the effect of different types of catheters on pain or discomfort was also limited. We identified a single study that showed significantly more patients reported pain and burning when using PVC catheters than when using PVC-free catheters.69 Clearly, there is a need for more research examining the effect of interventions, including different types of catheters, on pain and discomfort during IC.

 

Although there was variability in reported prevalence rates of urinary incontinence in patients using IC for bladder management, recent research suggests that it is prevalent.16,29,35,45,47,71,72 Limited evidence suggests urinary incontinence is more common among IC users than in individuals managed with an indwelling catheter. We believe this observation must be carefully weighed against the multiple serious urologic complications associated with long-term indwelling catheterization for management of neurogenic bladder or other forms of LUT dysfunction.80 One intervention study found that a self-management intervention decreased the prevalence of urinary incontinence compared to baseline.35 While 15% fewer patients reported urinary incontinence postintervention, the difference was not statistically significant although the sample was small limiting the power to detect differences. One study in children supports the importance of bowel management in patients with concurrent bladder dysfunction and constipation.72 There is a need for research focusing on interventions to reduce urinary incontinence in patients using IC to manage bladder function, along with studies evaluating the effect of IC as a means of complete bladder emptying on rates of urinary incontinence.

 

We found evidence of multiple uncommon to rare complications associated with IC such as urethral stricture, bladder stones, changes in upper urinary tract function, and squamous cell carcinoma. Fortunately, rates of these complications varied from uncommon to rare and additional research is needed to determine whether some of the most serious potential complications, particularly changes in upper urinary tract function and squamous cell carcinoma, can be directly linked to IC versus the sequalae of neurogenic or other forms of chronic and serious LUT dysfunctions requiring IC.

 

Limitations

There are several limitations that need to be considered. While we searched 4 major electronic databases, we did not search psychology or social science databases (eg, PsychINFO) or the gray literature. We also limited our search to studies published in English. As a result, we may have missed relevant articles. In addition, while we provided justification for selecting the start date for our search, we may have missed earlier evidence published in relation to some of our outcomes. Many of the studies used observational designs, which limit the ability to make causal inferences in relation to the outcomes.

 

CONCLUSIONS

In this scoping review, we examined recently published evidence about a number of outcomes related to IC. The amount and quality of evidence available for many of the outcomes makes it difficult to draw conclusions. There is, however, some evidence to suggest that most patients can successfully master IC and that functional status is probably the most important predictor of success; adherence to IC probably decreases over time; that UTIs are the most common complication of IC and that prophylactic antibiotic therapy may reduce the risk of recurrent UTIs; that urinary incontinence is also a common complication; and that other complications such as urethral strictures, bladder stones, hematuria, and urethral false passage do occur but less commonly than UTIs and urinary incontinence. This review also revealed many gaps in the evidence to support care for patients using IC. The wide variation in the rates of many complications suggests the need for well-designed prospective studies to provide better evidence about how commonly they occur and who is at risk to develop them. There is a general lack of recent research on IC in the pediatric population. Finally, there is an urgent need for well-designed intervention studies to determine how to improve outcomes for patients using IC to manage bladder function. These studies need to consider both the risks and benefits of interventions and include patient-specific outcome measures such as QoL, satisfaction, and perceived treatment burden.

 

REFERENCES

 

1. Feneley RCL, Hopley IB, Wells PNT. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(8):459-470. doi:10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600. [Context Link]

 

2. Gray M, Wasner M, Nichols T. Nursing practice related to intermittent catheterization. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2019;46(5):418-423. doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000576. [Context Link]

 

3. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: toward a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. [Context Link]

 

4. Castillo J, Ostermaier KK, Fremion E, et al Urologic self-management through intermittent self-catheterization among individuals with spina bifida: a journey to self-efficacy and autonomy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(3/4):219-226. doi:10.3233/PRM-170447. [Context Link]

 

5. Hentzen C, Haddad R, Ismael SS, et al Intermittent self-catheterization in older adults: predictors of success for technique learning. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22(1):65-71. doi:10.5213/inj.1835008.504. [Context Link]

 

6. Parsons BA, Narshi A, Drake MJ. Success rates for learning intermittent self-catheterisation according to age and gender. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(4):1127-1131. doi:10.1007/s11255-012-0136-x. [Context Link]

 

7. Vahter L, Zopp I, Kreegipuu M, Kool P, Talvik T, Gross-Paju K. Clean intermittent self-catheterization in persons with multiple sclerosis: the influence of cognitive dysfunction. Mult Scler. 2009;15(3):379-384. doi:10.1177/1352458508098599. [Context Link]

 

8. Afsar SI, Yemisci OU, Cosar SNS, Cetin N. Compliance with clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: a long-term follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(8):645-649. doi:10.1038/sc.2013.46. [Context Link]

 

9. AlSaleh AJ, Qureshi AZ, Syamsuddin Abdin Z, Mushabbab AlHabter A. Long-term compliance with bladder management in patients with spinal cord injury: a Saudi-Arabian perspective [published online ahead of print October 22, 2018]. J Spinal Cord Med. doi:10.1080/10790268.2018.1531609. [Context Link]

 

10. Batista-Miranda J, Martinez P, Bassas-Parga Y. Decreasing frequency pattern in patients with clean intermitten catheterization for bladder voiding dysfunction. Arch Esp Urol. 2014;67(10):831-838. [Context Link]

 

11. Castel-Lacanal E, Game X, De Boissezon X, et al Impact of intermittent catheterization on the quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1445-1450. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-1017-8. [Context Link]

 

12. Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Beekman J, van Wijlick E, Schaafstra J, van Kuppevelt D, Heesakkers J. Which factors make clean intermittent (self)catheterisation successful? J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(9/10):1308-1318. doi:10.1111/jocn.13187. [Context Link]

 

13. Faure A, Peycelon M, Lallemant P, Audry G, Forin V. Pro and cons of transurethral self-catheterization in boys: a long-term teaching experience in a pediatric rehabilitation centre. Pediatr Urol. 2016;13(02):2622-2628. [Context Link]

 

14. Girotti ME, MacCornick S, Perisse H, Batezini NS, Almeida FG. Determining the variables associated to clean intermittent selfcatheterization adherence rate: one-year follow-up study. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37(6):766-772. doi:10.1590/S1677-55382011000600013. [Context Link]

 

15. Hentzen C, Haddad R, Ismael SS, et al Predictive factors of adherence to urinary self-catheterization in older adults. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):770-778. doi:10.1002/nau.23915. [Context Link]

 

16. Lopes MAL, Lima EDR, de P. Continuous use of intermittent bladder catheterization-can social support help? Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014;22(3):461-466. doi:10.1590/0104-1169.3268.2438. [Context Link]

 

17. Motavasseli D, Chesnel C, Charlanes A, et al Adherence to anticholinergic therapy and clean intermittent self-catheterization in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22(2):133-141. doi:10.5213/inj.1836054.027. [Context Link]

 

18. Neel KF, Ozen C, Soliman H, Al-Hazmi AB, Gomha AA, Khatab B. Acceptance and compliance of clean intermittent catheterization among Saudi patients. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(7):1014-1017. https://www.smj.org.sa. [Context Link]

 

19. Zlatev DV, Shem K, Elliott CS. Predictors of long-term bladder management in spinal cord injury patients-upper extremity function may matter most. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(3):1106-1112. doi:10.1002/nau.23430. [Context Link]

 

20. Roberts TT, Leonard GR, Cepela DJ. Classifications in brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(5):1499-1504. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-5133-4. [Context Link]

 

21. Cardenas DD, Moore KN, Dannels-McClure A, et al Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PMR. 2011;3(5):408-417. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.01.001. [Context Link]

 

22. Chartier-Kastler E, Lauge I, Ruffion A, Goossens D, Charvier K, Biering-Sorensen F. Safety of a new compact catheter for men with neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a randomised, crossover and open-labelled study. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(7):844-850. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.5. [Context Link]

 

23. Chartier-Kastler E, Amarenco G, Lindbo L, et al A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization. J Urol. 2013;190(3):942-947. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.026. [Context Link]

 

24. Witjes JA, Del Popolo G, Marberger M, Jonsson O, Kaps HP, Chapple CR. A Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2794-2798. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.047. [Context Link]

 

25. Sarica S, Akkoc Y, Karapolat H, Aktug H. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):473-480. [Context Link]

 

26. Yilmaz B, Akkoc Y, Alaca R, et al Intermittent catheterization in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: obstacles, worries, level of satisfaction. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(11):826-830. doi:10.1038/sc.2014.134. [Context Link]

 

27. Akkoc Y, Ersoz M, Yldz N, et al Effects of different bladder management methods on the quality of life in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(3):226-231. doi:10.1038/sc.2012.131. [Context Link]

 

28. Alencar VP, Gomes CM, Miranda EP, et al Impact of the route of clean intermittent catheterization on quality of life in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2833-2840. doi:10.1002/nau.23789. [Context Link]

 

29. Chiappe SG, Lasserre A, Chartier Kastler E, et al Use of clean intermittent self-catheterization in France: a survey of patient and GP perspectives. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(4):528-534. doi:10.1002/nau.22752. [Context Link]

 

30. James R, Frasure HE, Mahajan ST. Urinary catheterization may not adversely impact quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients. ISRN Neurol. 2014;2014:1-4. doi:10.1155/2014/167030. [Context Link]

 

31. Jhanwar A, Sokhal AK, Singh K, Sankhwar S, Saini DK. Assessment of quality of life in patients of urethral stricture on clean intermittent catheterization following direct vision internal urethrotomy. Urol Ann. 2018;10(4):395-399. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_34_17. [Context Link]

 

32. Kessler TM, Ryu G, Burkhard FC. Clean intermittent self-catheterization: a burden for the patient? Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(1):18-21. doi:10.1002/nau.20610. [Context Link]

 

33. Liu CW, Attar KH, Gall A, Shah J, Craggs M. The relationship between bladder management and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury in the UK. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(4):319-324. doi:10.1038/sc.2009.132. [Context Link]

 

34. Liu JS, Dong C, Casey JT, Greiman A, Mukherjee S, Kielb SJ. Quality of life related to urinary continence in adult spina bifida patients. Cent Eur J Urol. 2015;68(1):61-67. doi:10.5173/ceju.2015.01.494. [Context Link]

 

35. Wilde MH, McMahon JM, Fairbanks E, et al Feasibility of a web-based self-management intervention for intermittent urinary catheter users with spinal cord injury. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2016;43(5):529-538. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000256. [Context Link]

 

36. Bolinger R, Engberg S. Barriers, complications, adherence, and self-reported quality of life for people using clean intermittent catheterization. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2013;40(1):83-89. doi:10.1097/WON.0b013e3182750117. [Context Link]

 

37. Faleiros F, De Oliveira Kappler C, Rosa T, Gimenes FRE. Intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection: a comparative study between Germany and Brazil. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2018;45(6):521-526. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000476. [Context Link]

 

38. Hakansson MA, Neovius K, Norrback M, Svensson J, Lundqvist T. Health care utilization and complications rates among users of hydrophilic-coated catheters. Urol Nurs. 2015;35(5):239-247. doi:10.7257/1053-816x.2015.35.5.239. [Context Link]

 

39. Li Y, Wen Y, He X, et al Application of clean intermittent catheterization for neurogenic bladder in infants less than 1 year old. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42(4):377-382. doi:10.3233/NRE-172366. [Context Link]

 

40. Uyar Aksu N, Ekinci Z, Dundar D, Baydemir C. Childhood urinary tract infection caused by extended-spectrum [beta]-lactamase-producing bacteria: risk factors and empiric therapy. Pediatr Int. 2017;59(2):176-180. doi:10.1111/ped.13112. [Context Link]

 

41. Woodbury MG, Hayes KC, Askes HK. Intermittent catheterization practices following spinal cord injury: a national survey. Can J Urol. 2008;15(3):4065-4071. [Context Link]

 

42. Yildiz Z, Candan C, Arga M, Turhan P, Isguven P, Erguven M. Urinary tract infections in children with myelodysplasia in whom clean intermittent catheterization was administered. Turk Pediatr Ars. 2014;49(1):36-41. doi:10.5152/tpa.2014.872. [Context Link]

 

43. Anderson CE, Chamberlain JD, Jordan X, et al Bladder emptying method is the primary determinant of urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord injury: results from a prospective rehabilitation cohort study. BJU Int. 2019;123(2):342-352. doi:10.1111/bju.14514. [Context Link]

 

44. Krebs J, Wollner J, Pannek J. Risk factors for symptomatic urinary tract infections in individuals with chronic neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(9):682-686. doi:10.1038/sc.2015.214. [Context Link]

 

45. Singh R, Rohilla R, Sangwan K, Siwach R, Magu N, Sangwan S. Bladder management methods and urological complications in spinal cord injury patients. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(2):141. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.77134. [Context Link]

 

46. Shen L, Zheng X, Zhang C, Zeng B, Hou C. Influence of different urination methods on the urinary systems of patients with spinal cord injury. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(5):1949-1957. doi:10.1177/030006051204000536. [Context Link]

 

47. Stillman MD, Hoffman JM, Barber JK, Williams SR, Burns SP. Urinary tract infections and bladder management over the first year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4(1):92. doi:10.1038/s41394-018-0125-0. [Context Link]

 

48. Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1668-1671. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.010. [Context Link]

 

49. DeFoor W, Reddy P, Reed M, et al Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(4):373.e1-373.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.06.003. [Context Link]

 

50. Li L, Ye W, Ruan H, Yang B, Zhang S. Impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4):782-787. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.010. [Context Link]

 

51. Prieto JA, Murphy C, Moore KN, Fader MJ. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management (abridged Cochrane review). Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(7):648-653. doi:10.1002/nau.22792. [Context Link]

 

52. Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1. [Context Link]

 

53. Akil I, Ozen C, Cengiz B. Do patients with neurogenic bladder treated with clean intermittent catheterization need antibacterial prophylaxis? Turkish J Med Sci. 2016;46(4):1151-1154. doi:10.3906/sag-1505-23. [Context Link]

 

54. Cox L, He C, Bevins J, Clemens JQ, Stoffel JT, Cameron AP. Gentamicin bladder instillations decrease symptomatic urinary tract infections in neurogenic bladder patients on intermittent catheterization. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(9):E350-E354. doi:10.5489/cuaj.4434. [Context Link]

 

55. Fakas N, Souli M, Koratzanis G, Karageorgiou C, Giamarellou H, Kanellakopoulou K. Effects of antimicrobial prophylaxis on asymptomatic bacteriuria and predictors of failure in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Chemother. 2010;22(1):36-43. doi:10.1179/joc.2010.22.1.36. [Context Link]

 

56. Fisher H, Oluboyede Y, Chadwick T, et al Continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for adults with repeated urinary tract infections (AnTIC): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(9):957-968. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30279-2. [Context Link]

 

57. Huen KH, Nik-Ahd F, Chen L, Lerman S, Singer J. Neomycin-polymyxin or gentamicin bladder instillations decrease symptomatic urinary tract infections in neurogenic bladder patients on clean intermittent catheterization. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(2):178.e1-178.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.12.001. [Context Link]

 

58. Michau A, Dinh A, Denys P, et al Control cross-sectional study evaluating an antibiotic prevention strategy in 30 pregnancies under clean intermittent self-catheterization and review of literature. Urology. 2016;91:58-63. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.007. [Context Link]

 

59. Pickard R, Chadwick T, Oluboyede Y, et al Continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infection in adults who perform clean intermittent self-catheterisation: the AnTIC RCT. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2018;22(24):1-102. doi:10.3310/hta22240. [Context Link]

 

60. Poirier C, Dinh A, Salomon J, Grall N, Andremont A, Bernard L. Prevention of urinary tract infections by antibioticcycling in spinal cord injury patients with low emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria. Med Mal Infect. 2016;46(6):294-299. doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2016.02.010. [Context Link]

 

61. Previnaire J-G, Le Berre M, Hode E, et al A 5-day antibiotic course for treatment of intermittent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017;3(1):17017. doi:10.1038/scsandc.2017.17. [Context Link]

 

62. Zegers B, Uiterwaal C, Kimpen J, et al Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections in children with spina bifida on intermittent catheterization. J Urol. 2011;186(6):2365-2371. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.108. [Context Link]

 

63. Prasad A, Cevallos ME, Riosa S, Darouiche RO, Trautner BW. A bacterial interference strategy for prevention of UTI in persons practicing intermittent catheterization. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(7):565-569. doi:10.1038/sc.2008.166. [Context Link]

 

64. Radojicic Z, Milivojevic S, Milic N, Lazovic JM, Lukac M, Sretenovic A. The influence of bowel management on the frequency of urinary infections in spina bifida patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):318.e1-318.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.05.025. [Context Link]

 

65. Krebs J, Wollner J, Pannek J. Urethral strictures in men with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction using intermittent catheterization for bladder evacuation. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(4):310-313. doi:10.1038/sc.2015.15. [Context Link]

 

66. Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Nicol DL. Clean intermittent self-catheterization does not appear to be effective in the prevention of urethral stricture recurrence. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(1):71-73. doi:10.3109/21681805.2015.1086888. [Context Link]

 

67. Cornejo-Davila V, Duran-Ortiz S, Pacheco-Gahbler C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with spinal cord injury treated with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Urology. 2017;99:260-264. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.024. [Context Link]

 

68. Domurath B, Kutzenberger J, Kurze I, Knoth HS. Clinical evaluation of a newly developed catheter (SpeediCath Compact Male) in men with spinal cord injury: residual urine and user evaluation. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(7):817-821. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.14. [Context Link]

 

69. Johansson K, Greis G, Johansson B, et al Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Scand J Urol. 2013;47(1):33-37. doi:10.3109/00365599.2012.696136. [Context Link]

 

70. Bartel P, Krebs J, Wollner J, Gocking K, Pannek J. Bladder stones in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term study. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(4):295-297. doi:10.1038/sc.2014.1. [Context Link]

 

71. Mazzo A, Souza-Junio VD, Jorge BM, et al Intermittent urethral catheterization-descriptive study at a Brazilian service. Appl Nurs Res. 2014;27(3):170-174. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2013.12.002. [Context Link]

 

72. Radojicic Z, Milivojevic S, Milic N, Lazovic JM, Lukac M, Sretenovic A. Impact of bowel management in alleviating symptoms of urinary incontinence in patients with spina bifida associated with overactive bladder and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. BJU Int. 2019;123(1):118-123. doi:10.1111/bju.14414. [Context Link]

 

73. Elzeneini W, Waly R, Marshall D, Bailie A. Early start of clean intermittent catheterization versus expectant management in children with spina bifida. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(2):322-325. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.096. [Context Link]

 

74. Woo J, Palazzi K, Dwek J, Kaplan G, Chiang G. Early clean intermittent catheterization may not prevent dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan abnormalities in children with spinal dysraphism. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):274-277. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.001. [Context Link]

 

75. Casey RG, Cullen IM, Crotty T, Quinlan DM. Intermittent self-catheterization and the risk of squamous cell cancer of the bladder: an emerging clinical entity? J Can Urol Assoc. 2009;3(5):E51-E54. doi:10.5489/cuaj.1162. [Context Link]

 

76. WHO. Adherence to long-term therapies. https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_Section1.pdf. Accessed December 2, 2019. [Context Link]

 

77. Faleiros F, Warschausky S, Kappler C, et al bladder self-management in the transition to adulthood with spina bifida in 3 countries: a comparative study. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2019;46(4):321-326. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000545. [Context Link]

 

78. Bernard L. Safety and Efficacy of a Weekly Oral Cyclic Antibiotic Programme in the Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection on Neurological Bladder (PACHIU). Tours, France: University Hospital, Tours; 2017. [Context Link]

 

79. Moriel D, Schembri M. Vaccination approaches for the prevention of urinary tract infection. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2013;14(11):967-974. doi:10.2174/1389201014666131226144824. [Context Link]

 

80. Weld K, Wall B, Mangold T, Steere E, Dmochowski R. Re: Influences on renal function in chronic spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2001;165(6 I):1490-1493. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66275-1. [Context Link]

 

For 2 additional continuing education articles related to intermittent self-catheterization, go to http://NursingCenter.com.

 

Adherence; Adults; Children; Complications; Intermittent catheterization; Satisfaction; Scoping review