Authors

  1. Salinaro, Julia R. MD
  2. DiSilvestro, Jessica MD
  3. Lokich, Elizabeth MD

Article Content

Learning Objectives:After participating in this continuing professional development activity, the provider should be better able to:

 

1. Compare and contrast cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

 

2. Select appropriate diagnostic testing for patients with adenocarcinoma in situ.

 

3. Identify the primary treatment strategies for patients with adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma.

 

 

Although the rate of cervical cancer is declining, the global burden remains high with over 600,000 new diagnoses every year, including nearly 14,000 in the United States.1 The overall decline in cervical cancer is related primarily to the decreasing incidence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), the most common subtype. However, the incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma, the second most common subtype, continues to rise, accounting for 20% to 25% of all cases.2 As with SCC, this disease disproportionately impacts young patients.

 

Risk factors for cervical adenocarcinoma and SCC are similar, including a greater number of sexual partners, obesity, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and oral contraceptive use. In contrast to SCC, smoking does not seem to increase the risk of adenocarcinoma.3

 

Invasive cervical adenocarcinoma and its preinvasive precursor adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) arise from the glandular endocervix. This differs from SCC, which originates from the transformation zone in proximity to the ectocervix. Despite these distinct origins, cervical adenocarcinoma and SCC have historically been grouped together in the cervical cancer literature. However, there is increasing recognition of important differences between these 2 disease entities (Table 1). In this review, we focus on the diagnosis, histopathologic classification, and management of cervical adenocarcinoma.

  
Table 1 - Click to enlarge in new windowTable 1. Comparison of Cervical Adenocarcinoma With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

The most common presenting symptom of cervical adenocarcinoma is vaginal bleeding, often postcoital. In rare cases a cervical mass or lesion will be detectable on physical examination, and a diagnostic biopsy should be obtained. However, most patients are asymptomatic and diagnosed after routine screening.

 

Both AIS and invasive cervical adenocarcinomas are more readily detected by HPV testing (either alone or cotesting) than pap cytology alone.4-6 In one retrospective cohort study of 87 patients, 52% of those with AIS and 24% of those with invasive adenocarcinoma had a negative or low-risk pap cytology preceding diagnosis, but all tested positive for high-risk HPV.6 This is explained in part by the fact that cervical adenocarcinoma arises from the endocervix, which may not be as accessible by traditional cytology collection techniques.

 

Of those who do have a preceding high-risk pap cytology, atypical glandular cells (AGC or AGUS) is the most common.6 In a large study of AGUS pap smears, 2.9% were diagnosed with AIS and 5.2% with invasive cancer, of which 57.6% were endometrial adenocarcinoma and 23.6% were cervical adenocarcinoma.7 After an abnormal screening test, the diagnosis of AIS or invasive adenocarcinoma is then confirmed with colposcopy, cervical biopsy, and/or endocervical curettage (ECC).

 

Histopathologic Classification

Over the past decade, there have been significant changes to the histopathologic classification of cervical adenocarcinoma. In 2018, the International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification was revised to include 2 major subtypes: HPV-associated (HPVA) and non-HPV-associated or HPV-independent (HPVI) (Table 2).8 This classification system was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2020.

  
Table 2 - Click to enlarge in new windowTable 2. Classification of Cervical Adenocarcinomas

HPV-Associated Cervical Adenocarcinoma

HPVA tumors are more common, comprising 80% to 90% of all cervical adenocarcinomas. HPVA tumors are further stratified by histopathologic characteristics, with "usual type" accounting for nearly 75% of all cervical adenocarcinomas.8 Other HPVA variants include mucinous, invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma, micropapillary, and villoglandular. Villoglandular tumors generally have a good prognosis compared with other variants.9

 

Similar to SCC, HPV16 is the most common genotype associated with AIS and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma; however, there is a higher proportion of HPV18 infection detected in cervical adenocarcinomas compared with SCC.4,10,11 HPV association also serves as an important prognostic indicator, as patients with HPVA cervical adenocarcinomas have improved survival and reduced risk of recurrence when compared with HPVI cervical adenocarcinomas.12

 

HPV-Independent Cervical Adenocarcinoma

Of the HPVI cancers, gastric-type is the most common, representing 10% of all cervical adenocarcinomas. Gastric-type cancers are characterized by tumor cells with prominent eosinophilic, mucinous cytoplasm and an infiltrative pattern of invasion.13 Because they are HPV negative, these tumors tend to be diagnosed at an advanced stage. In addition, they behave more aggressively than the HPVA types and have a worse prognosis.14

 

Other HPVI subtypes include mesonephric, clear cell, and endometrioid. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas represent less than 1% of all cervical adenocarcinomas and arise from hyperplasia of the mesonephric remnants along the posterolateral wall of the cervix.15 Clear cell cervical adenocarcinomas account for approximately 3% of all cervical adenocarcinomas and are historically associated with in utero diethylstilbestrol exposure.16 Endometrioid tumors of the endocervix are very rare, representing less than 1% of cervical adenocarcinomas.13 Given the glandular origin, all types of endocervical tumors may be difficult to distinguish from primary endometrial tumors arising from the lower uterine segment. However, cervical adenocarcinomas typically lack hormone receptors and are more readily associated with carcinoembryonic antigen and p16 expression.17

 

Adenocarcinoma in Situ

AIS is the preinvasive counterpart of invasive adenocarcinoma. If untreated, the average time for progression of AIS to invasive adenocarcinoma ranges from 5 to 13 years.4,18 As described previously, the diagnosis of AIS is made with colposcopy, cervical biopsy, and/or ECC. The median age at diagnosis is 35, and the incidence continues to rise, particularly among patients aged 30 to 39 years.19,20

 

After initial diagnosis, an excisional procedure is recommended to exclude invasive adenocarcinoma. Cold knife cone (CKC) is the preferred excisional method and the specimen should be removed intact with a recommended length of at least 10 mm, and up to 20 mm if childbearing is complete. Loop electrode excision (LEEP) is acceptable if CKC is not able to be performed. However, this can result in a higher rate of positive margins requiring additional excisional procedures. Performance of a "top hat" to achieve adequate depth is unacceptable as the entire specimen should be removed intact. ECC should be performed after the excisional procedure.21

 

In AIS, achieving negative margins on an excisional procedure reduces but does not eliminate the risk of residual or recurrent disease.20 In a large meta-analysis of outcomes based on margin status after excisional treatment of AIS, the risk of recurrent disease in patients with negative margins was 2.6% compared with 19.4% of those with positive margins. The rates of residual disease were 20.3% and 52.8%, respectively.20 This may be explained in part by the tendency for AIS to have skip lesions within the endocervix and/or uterine corpus rather than spreading contiguously from a focal origin. Because of this risk of residual disease, completion hysterectomy is recommended after excision of AIS with negative margins. Patients should then be surveilled with cotesting annually for 3 years, followed by 3-year interval cotesting for at least 25 years.22

 

Patients may also opt for fertility-sparing management, provided they have an excision with negative margins, can adhere to surveillance recommendations, and have received adequate counseling regarding the risks of residual or recurrent AIS. Surveillance includes cotesting (pap cytology and HPV) and ECC every 6 months for 3 years then annually.23 Once childbearing is complete, hysterectomy is recommended. Based on limited data, continued surveillance can be considered if HPV testing remains negative.23,24

 

If the excisional specimen has positive margins, options include a repeat excisional procedure (preferred if feasible) or either simple or modified radical hysterectomy.23 These patients should be referred to gynecologic oncology for definitive surgery.

 

Invasive Adenocarcinoma

Diagnosis and Staging

Invasive cervical adenocarcinoma is typically diagnosed from a colposcopic or excisional biopsy. As with SCC, stage at diagnosis is the most important prognostic indicator for cervical adenocarcinoma. Staging is performed in accordance with the 2018 FIGO classification system (Table 3). The use of imaging and clinical staging as adjuncts to definitive surgical staging is important to help identify which patients are appropriate surgical candidates. All imaging modalities are permitted for staging, and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT is considered the most accurate imaging modality for detection of lymph node metastases.25 Some patients with negative PET-CT will benefit from laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy, which is more sensitive in detecting metastatic disease to the lymph nodes than PET-CT before treatment planning. Cystoscopy and proctoscopy can also aide in the clinical evaluation if extension into the bladder or rectum is suspected.

  
Table 3 - Click to enlarge in new windowTable 3. 2018 FIGO Staging System for Cervical Cancer

Management

The National Cancer Center Network clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations for the management of cervical cancer.26 At present, the guidelines are similar for both SCC and cervical adenocarcinoma. The method of treatment depends on disease stage, desire for fertility, performance status, and the patient's goals of care. In general, primary treatment options include surgery (conservative or radical depending on stage and risk factors), concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation (CCRT), systemic chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy.

 

Early-Stage Disease

Most patients will present with early-stage disease. In a retrospective study of over 18,000 patients with cervical adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2017, 57.1% were diagnosed with early-stage cancers (IA1-IB2).27 Microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma, defined as stage IA without lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), has a favorable prognosis and conservative, fertility-sparing management strategies can be considered.28 Similar to AIS, the initial management is a CKC. If negative margins are achieved and fertility-sparing management is desired, the patient can be followed with close surveillance. If childbearing is complete, simple hysterectomy is recommended.

 

For patients with stage IA1 with LVSI or IA2 disease, modified radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node sampling is recommended. Patients with IA2 disease and no LVSI may be candidates for more conservative surgery with simple hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node sampling. For those who desire fertility, options include CKC or radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymph node sampling.29

 

For patients with higher-risk early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma (stages IB1 and IB2), primary radical surgery is preferred, but CCRT can also be considered. As with SCC, a key consideration in the management of patients with high-risk early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma is determining who should receive adjuvant radiation after primary radical surgery. This decision must balance the risk of recurrent disease with the increased morbidity when surgery and radiation are combined.

 

Adjuvant radiation after radical surgery is recommended for patients with a high recurrence risk. The findings of positive lymph nodes, positive surgical margins, and/or positive parametria substantially increase recurrence risk after surgery and thus chemoradiation is recommended for these patients. Additionally, the Sedlis criteria (LVSI, depth of invasion, and tumor size) have historically defined a cohort of patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery who benefitted from radiation.30 However, this criterion was developed primarily for patients with SCC, and more recent data suggest that only tumor size remains associated with an increased risk of recurrence for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.31 In addition, recurrence rates for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma seem to be higher than those with SCC in the absence of adjuvant radiation. Because of these differences, a histology-specific nomogram has been proposed that would better predict the need for adjuvant radiation among patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.31 Further prospective studies are needed.

 

Locally Advanced, Metastatic, and Recurrent Disease

Approximately 31% of patients will be diagnosed with locally advanced disease (stages IB3, II, III, and IVA).27 CCRT is the primary treatment strategy, and data suggest similar survival benefit from CCRT for patients with both cervical adenocarcinoma and SCC.32 For those with metastatic (stage IVB) and recurrent cervical adenocarcinoma, systemic platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment33 and response to chemotherapy is similar between SCC and cervical adenocarcinoma.34 Additionally, there is a growing role for immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer.

 

For a centralized, isolated local recurrence, pelvic exenteration may be considered for well-selected candidates. Regardless of treatment strategy, recurrent, advanced cervical adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis, and goals of care should be addressed for all patients.35

 

Ovaries: Clinical Significance and Management

Ovarian metastases are more common in cervical adenocarcinoma than in SCC, occurring in about 5% of cases overall and 2% of those with early-stage disease.36,37 As with other gynecologic malignancies, the route by which cervical adenocarcinoma spreads to the ovaries is not completely understood and may vary for different tumors.

 

The increased frequency of ovarian involvement in cervical adenocarcinoma compared with SCC had historically led to the recommendation for bilateral salpingoophorectomy as part of the surgical management of these patients. However, this disease often impacts young patients for whom ovarian preservation would otherwise be desired. More recently, an analysis of nearly 4000 patients with early-stage cervical cancer demonstrated improved overall survival for patients with stage IA cervical cancer who underwent ovarian conservation, including those with cervical adenocarcinoma.38 Further research has supported these findings, and thus ovarian preservation is considered safe in patients with early-stage disease for whom primary surgical management is appropriate.

 

Disparities

As with other gynecologic malignancies, there are significant disparities in outcomes for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. Recent data suggest that Black patients and those with public insurance are less likely to be diagnosed at an early stage.27 In addition, although the incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma is highest among Hispanic and White patients, Black patients experience the greatest associated mortality.39 These disparities in diagnosis and mortality are complex but likely arise in part due to barriers to care and limited access to screening and guideline-concordant treatments. Developing interventions to address these disparities is of critical importance.

 

Conclusion

AIS and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma have been increasingly recognized as different from their squamous cell counterparts. Glandular disease can be more difficult to detect by routine screening methods and once detected, management differs in several important ways given the distinct risk factors for recurrence and pattern of disease spread. Fertility-sparing surgery is often an option for patients with noninvasive or early disease who desire future childbearing. However, patients with additional risk factors or more advanced disease require more radical surgery and/or different treatment modalities including radiation, chemotherapy, and immune therapy. HPV vaccination and screening in accordance with ASCCP guidelines remain the most important tools we have for reducing cervical cancer morbidity and mortality.

 

Practice Pearls

 

* Cervical adenocarcinoma currently accounts for nearly 20% to 25% of cervical cancers.

 

* Cervical adenocarcinomas are classified as either HPV-associated or HPV-independent; HPV-associated tumors account for up to 75% of cervical adenocarcinomas and have a more favorable prognosis.

 

* AIS should initially be managed with an excisional procedure (with goal of negative margins) before completion hysterectomy or surveillance.

 

* Patients with AIS and early-stage invasive cervical adenocarcinoma can be offered fertility-sparing treatment options.

 

* Patients with AIS should be offered definitive hysterectomy at the completion of childbearing.

 

* Cervical adenocarcinoma and SCC have similar response rates to CCRT and systemic chemotherapy.

 

* Ovarian metastases are more common in cervical adenocarcinoma, but ovarian preservation is considered safe for early-stage disease.

 

* Black patients experience greater mortality from cervical adenocarcinoma.

 

References

 

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. [Context Link]

 

2. Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR, et al The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States-a 24-year population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78(2):97-105. [Context Link]

 

3. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Sweetland S, Green J. Comparison of risk factors for squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the cervix: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(9):1787-1791. [Context Link]

 

4. Monsonego J, Cox JT, Behrens C, et al Prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes and associated risk of cervical precancerous lesions in a large U.S. screening population: data from the ATHENA trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(1):47-54. [Context Link]

 

5. Zhang RC, Vue NC, Obasi LU, et al Impact of screening modality on the detection of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021;25(4):267-269. [Context Link]

 

6. Moukarzel LA, Angarita AM, VandenBussche C, et al preinvasive and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma: preceding low-risk or negative Pap result increases time to diagnosis. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(2):91-96. [Context Link]

 

7. Schnatz PF, Guile M, O'Sullivan DM, et al Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(3):701-708. [Context Link]

 

8. Stolnicu S, Barsan I, Hoang L, et al International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): a new pathogenetic classification for invasive adenocarcinomas of the endocervix. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(2):214-226. [Context Link]

 

9. Dietl AK, Beckmann MW, Aumann K. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(2):317-327. [Context Link]

 

10. Zielinski GD, Snijders PJ, Rozendaal L, et al The presence of high-risk HPV combined with specific p53 and p16INK4a expression patterns points to high-risk HPV as the main causative agent for adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. J Pathol. 2003;201(4):535-543. [Context Link]

 

11. Li N, Franceschi S, Howell-Jones R, et al Human papillomavirus type distribution in 30,848 invasive cervical cancers worldwide: variation by geographical region, histological type and year of publication. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(4):927-935. [Context Link]

 

12. Chen H, Xiong W, Dong X, et al Infection status and survival impact of high-risk human papillomavirus in cervical adenocarcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;167(1):129-136. [Context Link]

 

13. Park KJ. Cervical adenocarcinoma: integration of HPV status, pattern of invasion, morphology and molecular markers into classification. Histopathology. 2020;76(1):112-127. [Context Link]

 

14. Karamurzin YS, Kiyokawa T, Parkash V, et al Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumor with unusual metastatic patterns and poor prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(11):1449-1457. [Context Link]

 

15. Kenny SL, McBride HA, Jamison J, et al Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and corpus: HPV-negative neoplasms that are commonly PAX8, CA125, and HMGA2 positive and that may be immunoreactive with TTF1 and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-[beta]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(6):799-807. [Context Link]

 

16. Huo D, Anderson D, Palmer JR, et al Incidence rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix: update after 40-year follow-up. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146(3):566-571. [Context Link]

 

17. McCluggage WG, Sumathi VP, McBride HA, et al A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2002;21(1):11-15. [Context Link]

 

18. Plaxe SC, Saltzstein SL. Estimation of the duration of the preclinical phase of cervical adenocarcinoma suggests that there is ample opportunity for screening. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75(1):55-61. [Context Link]

 

19. Cleveland AA, Gargano JW, Park IU, et al Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: human papillomavirus types and incidence trends in five states, 2008-2015. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(3):810-818. [Context Link]

 

20. Salani R, Puri I, Bristow RE. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a metaanalysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2009;200(2):182.e181-182.e185. [Context Link]

 

21. Lea JS, Shin CH, Sheets EE, et al Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87(1):129-132. [Context Link]

 

22. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102-131. [Context Link]

 

23. Teoh D, Musa F, Salani R, et al Diagnosis and management of adenocarcinoma in situ: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidence-based review and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):869-878. [Context Link]

 

24. Costa S, Venturoli S, Negri G, et al Factors predicting the outcome of conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an analysis of 166 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(3):490-495. [Context Link]

 

25. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2021;155:28-44. [Context Link]

 

26. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical Cancer (Version 1.2023). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/pdf/cervical.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2023. [Context Link]

 

27. Smith AJB, Beavis AL, Rositch AF, et al Disparities in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database, 2004-2017. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2023;27(1):29-34. [Context Link]

 

28. Smith HO, Qualls CR, Romero AA, et al Is there a difference in survival for IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85(2):229-241. [Context Link]

 

29. Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y. Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: indications and applications. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(12):1435-1438. [Context Link]

 

30. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, et al A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73(2):177-183. [Context Link]

 

31. Levinson K, Beavis AL, Purdy C, et al Beyond Sedlis-a novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: an NRG/GOG ancillary analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(3):532-538. [Context Link]

 

32. Rose PG, Java JJ, Whitney CW, et al Locally advanced adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix in gynecologic oncology group trials of cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(2):208-212. [Context Link]

 

33. Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ, et al Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):734-743. [Context Link]

 

34. Kastritis E, Bamias A, Efstathiou E, et al The outcome of advanced or recurrent non-squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(2):376-382. [Context Link]

 

35. Elit L, Fyles AW, Devries MC, et al Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(3):528-535. [Context Link]

 

36. Shimada M, Kigawa J, Nishimura R, et al Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(2):234-237. [Context Link]

 

37. Jiao X-B, Hu J, Zhu L-R. The safety of ovarian preservation in early-stage adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(8):1510-1514. [Context Link]

 

38. Matsuo K, Machida H, Shoupe D, et al Ovarian conservation and overall survival in young women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):139-151. [Context Link]

 

39. Cohen CM, Wentzensen N, Castle PE, et al Racial and ethnic disparities in cervical cancer incidence, survival, and mortality by histologic subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(5):1059-1068. [Context Link]

 

Adenocarcinoma in situ; Cervical adenocarcinoma; Squamous cell carcinoma