Buy this Article for $10.95

Have a coupon or promotional code? Enter it here:

When you buy this you'll get access to the ePub version, a downloadable PDF, and the ability to print the full article.

Keywords

skin tears, classification, reliability, and validity

 

Authors

  1. LeBlanc, Kimberly MN, RN, CETN(C) IIWCC
  2. Baranoski, Sharon MSN, RN, CWCN, APN-CCNS, MAPWCA, FAAN
  3. Holloway, Samantha MSc, RN
  4. Langemo, Diane PhD, RN, FAAN

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate and establish reliability of the International Skin Tear classification system.

 

METHOD: A consensus panel of 12 internationally recognized key opinion leaders convened in 2011 to establish consensus statements on the prevention, prediction, assessment, and treatment of skin tears. Subsequently, a new skin tear classification system was proposed. The system was then tested for interrater and intrarater reliability between the experts before being tested more widely on a sample of 327 individuals from the United States, Canada, and Europe.

 

RESULTS: The results of the study indicated a substantial level of agreement for the expert panel (Fleiss [kappa] = 0.619; 2-month follow-up = 0.653). Intrarater reliability was high (Cohen [kappa] = 0.877). Interrater reliability was moderate (Fleiss [kappa] = 0.555) for healthcare professionals (n = 303) and fair for non-health professionals (Fleiss [kappa] = 0.338; n = 24).

 

CONCLUSIONS: This international study established the reliability and validity of a new classification system for skin tears.