Authors

  1. Meredith, Genevive R. DrPH
  2. Welter, Christina R. DrPH
  3. Risley, Kris DrPH
  4. Seweryn, Steven M. EdD
  5. Altfeld, Susan PhD
  6. Jarpe-Ratner, Elizabeth A. PhD

Abstract

Context: Schools and programs of public health have been preparing graduates to join the workforce for a century, but significant gaps in numbers and abilities exit. Many have called for a change to the status quo, to transform public health education to create a competent workforce able to address current and emergent needs.

 

Objective: This study explored if Master of Public Health (MPH) programs have shifted their program design, curriculum, and/or instructional methods (instructional design), and if so, how and why.

 

Design: A sequential mixed-methods study.

 

Setting: MPH programs accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health, and approved applicants.

 

Participants: Some 43% of accredited MPH programs in the United States (n = 115) responded to the online survey (open November 21, 2019-December 20, 2019), providing a representative sample. Stratified purposeful sampling was used to select 8 MPH programs for follow-up semistructured interviews. Categorical and qualitative data were analyzed for trends, association, and themes.

 

Main Outcome Measures: Degree of, types of, and reasons for shifts in MPH program instructional design considered and implemented.

 

Results: MPH programs in the United States have shifted their approaches and curriculum to meet identified and emergent workforce needs. In the last 5 years, 81% made changes to program design (focal competencies, admissions, graduation criteria), 88% to curriculum (added or removed courses, changed course content), and 65% to pedagogical methods (where and how learning is supported).

 

Conclusions: Despite concerns about stagnation, MPH programs have shifted to competency-based education aligned with workforce needs, have adapted approaches to support diversity of future workers, and are focused on bolstering workforce readiness. These changes were made to enhance focus on knowledge acquisition, skills building, and professionalism, factors recognized as critical for success, and facilitate more engaged pedagogical strategies, working with communities for impact.