Authors
- Busolo, David RN, MPH
- Woodgate, Roberta RN, PhD
Abstract
Review question/objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence on palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups.
More specifically, this systematic review seeks to answer the following questions:
1. What are the palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from diverse ethnocultural groups?
2. What meanings do adult patients with cancer from diverse ethnocultural groups assign to their experiences with palliative care?
Background: Globally, over 20.4 million people need palliative care services annually.1 The majority of these people (19 million) are adults, with 34% of them being patients diagnosed with cancer.1 With the current increase in the aging population, especially in developed countries, the number of adults requiring palliative care is expected to rise.2 Furthermore, how palliative care is offered and received continues to be shaped by culture and ethnicity. Likewise, culture and ethnicity influence how palliative care patients experience diseases like cancer, and seek and utilize palliative care services.3 Also, healthcare providers sometimes find it challenging to address the palliative care needs of patients from different ethnocultural groups.4 Sometimes these challenges are believed to be due to cultural incompetence of the care provider.3,5-8 When palliative care patients and their providers differ in their perception of care needs and how to address them, negative palliative care experiences are likely to ensue.4 Therefore, as the demand for palliative care increases, and ethnocultural factors continue to affect palliation, it is important to gain a better understanding of palliative care experiences of patients from different ethnocultural groups.2,9
The terms culture and ethnicity have been defined and used differently in literature which sometimes lead to confusion.10 Ethnicity has been defined as distinctive shared origins or social backgrounds and traditions of a group of people that are maintained between generations and bring about a sense of identity that may encompass a common language and religion.11 Ethnicity is fluid and should not be confused with nationality or migration or race. In this review, we define ethnicity in relation to the self-identification of participants in studies that will be included in the review.
Culture refers to patterns of explanatory models, beliefs, values and customs.12 These patterns may be informed and expressed in things like diet, clothing or rituals, or in the form of language and social or political systems.12 Culture may be fluid because of developments in people's lives.10 In light of the aforementioned definitions, and recognizing the inconsistency in how these terms are sometimes used, the authors of this review define ethnocultural patients, as described in papers to be reviewed, as those who belong to an ethnic group by way of involvement, attachment, self-labelling or attitude towards the group, and who share cultural traditions, ancestry, language, nationality or country of origin.12-14
Palliative care in the context of cancer focuses on the improvement of the quality of life of patients by addressing their physical, emotional and spiritual needs, and by supporting their families.15 Palliative care is often associated with supportive and hospice care.15 Supportive care emphasizes meeting patients' needs such as physical, mental, social, psychological, emotional and material needs from the period before diagnosis, during diagnosis, treatment to the follow-up period in the cancer trajectory.16 Hospice care in the context of cancer aims to relieve patients' pain and suffering, and improve their quality of life. Hospice care includes palliative care services and other services such as case management, respite care and bereavement care. Hospice care focuses on patients with terminal illness (i.e. with expected survival of less than six months) and their families.15 Moreover, hospice care is facilitated by a multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, social workers, chaplains, home health aides and volunteers.15
Palliative care needs for cancer patients are numerous and may include needs related to activities of daily living, communication17, sexuality18, physical needs19, psychological needs20,21, fear22, spiritual wellbeing21, socioeconomic aspects23 and insufficiency of information.24 Cancer patients often report of suffering, pain and being in constant need of support.25-27 In dealing with their suffering, some patients seek internal motivation by looking at the disease as a life challenge.25 Other patients turn to external sources of motivation like religion25,26, or peer and family support groups.26,28
Patients from different ethnocultural groups report similar as well as dissimilar palliative care needs and experiences.17,26,29-39 With respect to similarities, a study from the United States found that African American and Caucasian patients alike valued practical assistance from social groups.31,32 Participants from both ethnocultural groups valued friends and families that listened to their cancer-related concerns. Similarly, Turkish and Moroccan patients in a study conducted in Netherlands valued friends and family members that were there for them.4 Additionally, participants particularly of African American descent treasured positive attitudes from people around them and valued support from religion and faith communities.31 These sentiments are echoed in a palliative care study conducted in the United Kingdom.26 In the UK study, Caribbean Blacks and British White patients appreciated the significance of social networks and partner or spousal support in their cancer trajectory.26
In regards to unsupportive palliative care experiences, authors of the United States study report that African Americans and Caucasians had more similarities than differences.31 Firstly, both ethnocultural groups shared experiences of losing association with family and close friends after they learnt of the patients' diagnosis. These sentiments were also reported by Danish-born and immigrant patients in a study by Kristiansen and colleagues.34 Secondly, both African American and Caucasian patients felt responsible for the emotional wellbeing of their loved ones.
When it comes to differences in palliative care needs and experiences, Grange and colleagues31 report that African American and Caucasian participants valued provision of housing which included daily patient care.31 Participants treasured the opportunity to either move or have family members move in and live with them. However, more African American than Caucasian participants had experiences of moving in with a family member. Important differences in unsupportive palliative care were also reported. Although both African Americans and Caucasians lost friends and family members following knowledge of the cancer diagnoses, more African Americans than Caucasians were likely to report losing friendship. Additionally, African Americans experienced diminished independence mainly because of overprotection from family and friends.31 Diminishing independence is echoed in the Dutch study involving Turkish and Moroccan patients.4 However, in the Dutch study, healthcare providers appeared to advocate for patients' independence which contradicted with the value placed by family members in protecting their loved one.4
In another American study, Latina women desired health-related information more often than their Caucasian American counterparts.33 The need for information by Latina women was irrespective of their socio-demographic factors, including level of education.33
The aforementioned similarities and differences in palliative care experiences call for further exploration of ethnocultural palliative care patients' experiences. A better understanding of their experiences will create avenues for finding better ways of providing palliative care, preventing psychological distress and improving quality of life and death.40-42
Understanding ethnocultural issues is important because the unique characteristics of ethnocultural groups often inform approaches to palliative care. Ethnocultural meanings of illness, suffering and dying define the theoretical underpinnings that patients and healthcare providers draw upon in their relations.43 Furthermore, Baker suggests that the provision and receipt of palliative care is more related to culture or ethnicity than to age, education, socioeconomic status or other variables.44 Moreover, culture affects communication, decision-making, response to symptoms, treatment choices and emotional expression at the end of life.45
Palliative care patients often regard recommendations from healthcare providers as very useful.46,47 Similarly, healthcare providers may find ethnocultural knowledge beneficial in the provision of palliative care.9 When ethnocultural knowledge is lacking, healthcare providers, especially those with minimal training on ethnocultural issues, may provide unsatisfactory palliative care.8,9,48,49 Similarly, when ethnocultural differences are overlooked or inadequately addressed, inferior care often occurs.6 Inferior care which may involve inequality in utilization of and access to palliative care services, pain and symptom management and location of death5,7, is especially disturbing when adequate palliative care resources exist in some health institutions.50
Although qualitative and quantitative research has been conducted in this area, no systematic review compiling findings on ethnocultural patients' experiences of palliative care has been conducted or is underway as per the Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews or PROSPERO. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize findings of qualitative studies that focus on ethnocultural patients' experience of palliative care. Given that cultural incompetence of healthcare providers is one of the factors affecting palliative care experiences of patients from different ethnocultural groups, we anticipate that findings from this review will add to the body of knowledge in this area. Furthermore, nurses and other healthcare providers who are better informed about the perceptions and experiences of palliative care of patients from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds are more likely to be better situated to identify appropriate care needs and provide suitable interventions to these patients.
Definition of terms: For the purpose of this review, the following definitions will be used:
Palliative care- the interdisciplinary care offered by doctors, nurses and other healthcare providers that focuses on improving a patient's quality of life by addressing their physical, emotional and spiritual needs and on supporting their families.15 Palliative care as used in this systematic review encompasses supportive care and hospice care.
Ethnocultural groups - as described in papers under review, these are patients who belong to an ethnic group by way of involvement, attachment, self-labelling or attitude towards the group, and who share cultural traditions, ancestry, language, nationality or country of origin.12-14
Article Content
Inclusion criteria
Types of participants
This qualitative systematic review will consider studies that include adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups whose ethnicity differs from that of the main population in the country of care, with inclusion of studies that compare experiences of under-represented groups with main groups in the country of care.
Types of phenomena of interest
The phenomenon of interest is the experience of palliative health care.
Context
The context for this review will be adult patients with a diagnosis of cancer who are receiving palliative care and are from different ethnocultural groups.
Types of studies
This review will consider both interpretive and critical research studies that draw on the experiences of adult patients with cancer, including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. Published theses and dissertations will also be included. This review will exclude unpublished studies and other texts such as reports, expert opinion papers, narratives and conference proceedings.
Search strategy
The search strategy aims to find primary published studies only. The search will be limited to English articles. English articles will be excluded because researchers are limited in translation resources. Search dates will include articles published from January 1960 to the present. Researchers are of the opinion that papers published since palliative care was introduced in modern medicine by Cicely Saunders in the 1960s will provide the most comprehensive information on the review topic.51 A three-step search strategy will be used. In the initial stage, a limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken, followed by an analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract and index terms used to describe the article. A second search using identified key words and index terms will be conducted across all included databases. In the third step, the reference lists of all articles will be searched for additional articles relevant to this systematic review.
Databases to be searched:
Initial key words to be used include: Medical Subject Heading (MESH) terms: neoplasm, palliative care.
Other words: experiences, terminal care, terminally ill, hospice care, end of life care, dying, continuous care, supportive care, social support, counseling, population groups, cultural diversity, continental population groups, culture, intercultural, cross cultural, transcultural, ethnic, migrant, minorit* ethnic groups. Qualitative research, ethnography, phenomenology, anthropology, interview, focus group,
MeSH terms will be used for databases that use MeSH terms such as CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, Embase and PsycINFO. For databases that don't use MeSH terms, like Scopus a collection of terms used in databases that use MeSH terms will be used. During the literature search, consideration will be given to differences in terminology used.
All studies identified in the literature search will be assessed for relevance to the review based on the information provided in the title and abstract by the primary reviewer and secondary reviewer. Papers that meet inclusion criteria will be retrieved.
Assessment of methodological quality
The qualitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise will be resolved through discussion. Records containing the title, author, source, location and database sources of all articles will be maintained.
Data collection
Qualitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using standardized data extraction tools from JBI-QARI (Appendix II). Extracted data will include specific details about the populations, phenomena of interest, study methods and outcomes that are significant to the review question and objective.
Data synthesis
Qualitative research findings will be pooled using JBI-QARI. This pooling will involve aggregation or synthesis of findings to generate statements that reflect the aggregation through combining findings rated as per their quality and categorizing these findings depending on similarity in their meaning. These categories will then be subjected to meta-synthesis to come up with a comprehensive set of synthesized findings. Where textual pooling is not possible, findings will be presented in a narrative form.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
Mr Busolo is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) training fellowship under Dr Roberta Woodgate, Graduate Enhancement of Tri-Council Stipends (GETS), Sheu, L Lee Family Scholarship in Oncology Research and Murphy Scholarship in Graduate Research in Oncology Nursing.
Dr Roberta Woodgate is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Applied Chair Award in Reproductive, Child and Youth Health Services and Policy Research.
References
1. Alliance. WPC. Global Atlas of Palliative care at the End of Life 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/Global_Atlas_of_Palliative_Care.pdf. [Context Link]
2. Carstairs S. Raising the bar: A roadmap for the future of palliative care in Canada.. 2010. [Context Link]
3. Evans N, Menaca A, Koffman J, Harding R, Higginson IJ, Pool R, et al. Cultural competence in end-of-life care: terms, definitions, and conceptual models from the British literature. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(7):812-20. [Context Link]
4. de Graaff FM, Francke AL, van den Muijsenbergh ME, van der Geest S. 'Palliative care': a contradiction in terms? A qualitative study of cancer patients with a Turkish or Moroccan background, their relatives and care providers. BMC Palliat Care. 2010;9:19. [Context Link]
5. Bosma H, Apland L, Kazanjian A. Cultural conceptualizations of hospice palliative care: more similarities than differences. Palliat Med. 2010;24(5):510-22. [Context Link]
6. Kreling B, Selsky C, Perret-Gentil M, Huerta EE, Mandelblatt JS. 'The worst thing about hospice is that they talk about death': contrasting hospice decisions and experience among immigrant Central and South American Latinos with US-born White, non-Latino cancer caregivers. Palliat Med. 2010;24(4):427-34. [Context Link]
7. Lackan NA, Ostir GV, Freeman JL, Kuo YF, Zhang DD, Goodwin JS. Hospice use by Hispanic and non-Hispanic white cancer decedents. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):969-83. [Context Link]
8. Nakaguchi T, Okuyama T, Uchida M, Ito Y, Komatsu H, Wada M, et al. Oncology nurses' recognition of supportive care needs and symptoms of their patients undergoing chemotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(4):369-76. [Context Link]
9. Jovanovic M. Cultural competency and diversity among hospice palliative care volunteers. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012;29(3):165-70. [Context Link]
10. Koffman J. Servicing multi-cultural needs at the end of life. J Ren Care. 2014;40 Suppl 1:6-15. [Context Link]
11. Senior PA, Bhopal R. Ethnicity as a variable in epidemiological research. Bmj. 1994;309(6950):327-30. [Context Link]
12. Crawley LM. Racial, cultural, and ethnic factors influencing end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S58-69. [Context Link]
13. Phinney JS. Understanding ethnic diversity - The role of ethnic identity. American Behavioral Scientist. 1996;40(2):143-52. [Context Link]
14. Duckitt J, Parra C. Dimensions of group identification and out-group attitudes in four ethnic groups in New Zealand. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2004;26(4):237-47. [Context Link]
15. Hui D, De La Cruz M, Mori M, Parsons HA, Kwon JH, Torres-Vigil I, et al. Concepts and definitions for 'supportive care,' 'best supportive care,' 'palliative care,' and 'hospice care' in the published literature, dictionaries, and textbooks. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(3):659-85. [Context Link]
16. Fitch M. Providing supportive care for individuals living with cancer. Toronto: Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation, 1994. [Context Link]
17. de Graaff FM, Francke AL, van den Muijsenbergh ME, van der Geest S. Understanding and improving communication and decision-making in palliative care for Turkish and Moroccan immigrants: a multiperspective study. Ethn Health. 2012;17(4):363-84. [Context Link]
18. Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ. What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(8):1117-28. [Context Link]
19. Maguire R, Papadopoulou C, Kotronoulas G, Simpson MF, McPhelim J, Irvine L. A systematic review of supportive care needs of people living with lung cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(4):449-64. [Context Link]
20. Sutherland G, Hill D, Morand M, Pruden M, McLachlan SA. Assessing the unmet supportive care needs of newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009;18(6):577-84. [Context Link]
21. Armes J, Crowe M, Colbourne L, Morgan H, Murrells T, Oakley C, et al. Patients' supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6172-9. [Context Link]
22. Lam WW, Au AH, Wong JH, Lehmann C, Koch U, Fielding R, et al. Unmet supportive care needs: a cross-cultural comparison between Hong Kong Chinese and German Caucasian women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(2):531-41. [Context Link]
23. Mujahid MS, Janz NK, Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, Katz SJ. The impact of sociodemographic, treatment, and work support on missed work after breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(1):213-20. [Context Link]
24. Tiedtke C, de Rijk A, Dierckx de Casterle B, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Experiences and concerns about 'returning to work' for women breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2010;19(7):677-83. [Context Link]
25. Chio CC, Shih FJ, Chiou JF, Lin HW, Hsiao FH, Chen YT. The lived experiences of spiritual suffering and the healing process among Taiwanese patients with terminal cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):735-43. [Context Link]
26. Koffman J, Morgan M, Edmonds P, Speck P, Higginson IJ. 'The greatest thing in the world is the family': the meaning of social support among black Caribbean and white British patients living with advanced cancer. Psychooncology. 2012;21(4):400-8. [Context Link]
27. Koffman J, Morgan M, Edmonds P, Speck P, Higginson I. Cultural meanings of pain: a qualitative study of Black Caribbean and White British patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2008;22(4):350-9. [Context Link]
28. Zabalegui A, Sanchez S, Sanchez PD, Juando C. Nursing and cancer support groups. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(4):369-81. [Context Link]
29. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, Dimitry S, Tattersall MH. Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(7):1005-53. [Context Link]
30. Hancock K, Clayton JM, Parker SM, Wal der S, Butow PN, Carrick S, et al. Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2007;21(6):507-17. [Context Link]
31. Grange CM, Matsuyama RK, Ingram KM, Lyckholm LJ, Smith TJ. Identifying supportive and unsupportive responses of others: perspectives of African American and Caucasian cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2008;26(1):81-99. [Context Link]
32. Hamilton JB, Sandelowski M. Types of social support in African Americans with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31(4):792-800. [Context Link]
33. Janz NK, Mujahid MS, Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, Katz SJ. Racial/ethnic differences in adequacy of information and support for women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;113(5):1058-67. [Context Link]
34. Kristiansen M, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Krasnik A. 'Sometimes you just have to walk alone'-meanings of emotional support among Danish-born and migrant cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010;28(6):699-717. [Context Link]
35. Loggers ET, Maciejewski PK, Paulk E, DeSanto-Madeya S, Nilsson M, Viswanath K, et al. Racial differences in predictors of intensive end-of-life care in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(33):5559-64. [Context Link]
36. Parker SM, Clayton JM, Hancock K, Walder S, Butow PN, Carrick S, et al. A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(1):81-93. [Context Link]
37. Phelps AC, Maciejewski PK, Nilsson M, Balboni TA, Wright AA, Paulk ME, et al. Religious coping and use of intensive life-prolonging care near death in patients with advanced cancer. Jama. 2009;301(11):1140-7. [Context Link]
38. Worth A, Irshad T, Bhopal R, Brown D, Lawton J, Grant E, et al. Vulnerability and access to care for South Asian Sikh and Muslim patients with life limiting illness in Scotland: prospective longitudinal qualitative study. Bmj. 2009;338:b183. [Context Link]
39. Hanssen I. An intercultural nursing perspective on autonomy. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11(1):28-41. [Context Link]
40. Akechi T, Okuyama T, Endo C, Sagawa R, Uchida M, Nakaguchi T, et al. Patient's perceived need and psychological distress and/or quality of life in ambulatory breast cancer patients in Japan. Psychooncology. 2011;20(5):497-505. [Context Link]
41. Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):761-72. [Context Link]
42. Shim EJ, Mehnert A, Koyama A, Cho SJ, Inui H, Paik NS, et al. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer: A cross-cultural survey of German, Japanese, and South Korean patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;99(3):341-50. [Context Link]
43. Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition.. New York: Basic Books; 1988. [Context Link]
44. Baker ME. Economic, political and ethnic influences on end-of-life decision-making: a decade in review. J Health Soc Policy. 2002;14(3):27-39. [Context Link]
45. Valente SM. End of life and ethnicity. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2004;20(6):285-93. [Context Link]
46. Husain LS, Collins K, Reed M, Wyld L. Choices in cancer treatment: a qualitative study of the older women's (>70 years) perspective. Psychooncology. 2008;17(4):410-6. [Context Link]
47. Nanton V, Docherty A, Meystre C, Dale J. Finding a pathway: information and uncertainty along the prostate cancer patient journey. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(Pt 3):437-58. [Context Link]
48. Colon M. The experience of physicians who refer Latinos to hospice. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012;29(4):254-9. [Context Link]
49. de Graaff FM, Francke AL. Barriers to home care for terminally ill Turkish and Moroccan migrants, perceived by GPs and nurses: a survey. BMC Palliat Care. 2009;8:3. [Context Link]
50. McGarry S, Ward C, Garrod R, Marsden J. An exploratory study into the unmet supportive needs of breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013;22(5):673-83. [Context Link]
51. Saunders C. The evolution of palliative care. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2003;66(3):4-7. [Context Link]
Appendix I: Appraisal instruments
QARI appraisal instrument[Context Link]
Appendix II: Data extraction instruments
QARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]
Keywords: palliative care; ethnocultural; cancer; adult patient