Authors

  1. Lang, Dora RN, BSN, Adv Dip Nsg (Oncology), PHD
  2. Lim, Lay Cheng RN, BSN, Adv Dip Nsg (Oncology)

Abstract

Review question/objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence of the effects of art therapy for family caregivers of cancer patients.

 

Background: Cancer diagnosis is a family disease. It affects the individual patient as well as their family members.1 Cancer patients often receive cancer treatment for a substantial amount of time ranging from six to 12 months depending on the type and stage of cancer. Cancer treatment can disrupt the routine and daily functioning of family members who need to readjust their schedule to meet the needs of their loved one, especially when they play the role of caregiver.2 For some families, a disruption of their routine can be more profound and permanent. A majority of the caregivers have to give up their job to look after their loved one who is inflicted by cancer, resulting in an enormous loss in economic value. The national Survey on Income and Program Participation (SIPP) and the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH) in the United States identified more than 24 million people as informal caregivers (individuals who provide care for ill or disabled friends or family members). In 1997, the total economic value of caregiver's unpaid contributions totaled $196 billion.3 This value doubled in the following ten years and at 2007, it reached an estimated $ 350 billion according to the AARP Public Policy Institute.4

 

A study by Mosher et al.5 reported that family caregivers of cancer patients also suffered distress throughout the patient's journey of cancer treatment. More than 50% of family caregivers reported reductions in time for social activities, as well as decreased levels of energy, emotional well-being and an ability to cope with stress.5 They also reported that their experience had a negative impact on their physical functioning. The least reported effects were on their self-esteem, and relationships with patients and other family members. Interestingly, these areas improved as a result of their caregiving.5

 

Bakas et al.6 discovered that the stressors on family caregivers are multiple and similar across age groups. The consuming tasks experienced by family caregivers of adults, children and spouses were also similar, namely, medical or nursing treatments, personal care, mobility, emotional support, monitoring symptoms, transportation, managing finances, household tasks, running errands, planning activities, managing behavioral problems, finding care while away, communication, services and resources, and communication with health care professionals. The family caregivers in this study reported providing emotional support, transportation, and the monitoring of symptoms as being the three most consuming tasks.6 Conversely, finding care while being away, the provision of personal care and assistance with mobility were reported as being the least consuming tasks.6 Family caregivers also reported that providing emotional support and managing behavioral problems as the most challenging.6

 

Caregiver stress can lead to psychological and sleep disturbances and changes in the caregiver's physical health, immune function, and financial wellbeing.7 From the authors' personal clinical experience, this is observed repeatedly in caregivers who are experiencing tremendous physical and psychological distress due to the threat of losing their loved one who is the central focus of the caregiver's life. It is extremely difficult for parents whose child has been diagnosed with cancer and for spouses whose partner has been a companion for decades.

 

Literature has identified certain characteristics that make some family caregivers more vulnerable compared to others. Those who have received a high school education or less experience significantly more depression, tension and mood disturbance compared to those with a post secondary education.8 Educational and income levels are positively correlated with physical functioning and general health.5 Male caregivers reported better physical functioning than female caregivers.5Adult caregivers of children showed better physical functioning and general health than spousal caregivers.5 Employed caregivers showed better physical functioning and general health than the unemployed or retired.5 Patients who received chemotherapy were associated with the worst role-functioning by caregivers.5 The patient with a better diagnosis and functional status was associated with better role-functioning by caregivers.5 Understanding the effects of art therapy on different family caregiver characteristics can help to inform the art therapy provider, who can provide appropriate art therapy interventions and evaluate the effectiveness across the various groups of family caregivers.5

 

Since 1990, the recommended support services for family caregivers have been related to diagnostic and medical treatment information, interpretation of course of illness, anticipatory guidance, interpretation of patient's emotions, interpretation of illness to school age children, cognitive processing of the meaning of illness for individual families, access to services for physical care, skill building classes, problem-focused services and referral services for the exceptionally distressed family.1 In recent years, there has been a proliferation of studies examining the effectiveness of distraction therapies such as art therapy, music therapy and relaxation for both patients and family caregivers. A recent systematic review found that these therapies were effective for patients across a broad spectrum of symptoms including emotional and physical as well as social and global functioning, and spiritual concerns.9 Art therapy aimed to promote psychological wellbeing and provide comfort. Patients reported feeling refreshed and spiritually enriched and found the experience mind transforming.9 Similarly, artwork activity has been reported as being beneficial for caregivers. For example, art piece creation has been found to provide diversion from the burdens of a caregiver's role, relief from worries, promote humorous responses and good memorable experiences, reduce stress and anxiety, and enhance positive communication between loved ones and with health care professionals.10,11

 

Clinically, it is common for the cancer patient to seek treatment with the companion of the caregiver. Therefore, family caregiver's needs should not be neglected as they could be a pillar of strength and support for the cancer patient. This review seeks to determine whether art therapy provides a similar positive experience for family caregivers as it does for patients. If so, it is envisaged that both family caregivers and patients could participate in art therapy together instead of caregivers simply watching on. This could create opportunities for caregivers to gather and network with each other and possibly relieve their stress in the hospital.12

 

Article Content

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

This review will consider studies that include adult family caregivers-18 years or older, - of a cancer patient. Family caregivers experience with cancer patients could vary among those who are actively receiving potential curative treatment versus those who are dying and near the end of life. Therefore, the scope of this review will focus solely on family caregivers who are providing care and support for cancer patients who are still undergoing active treatment such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, biotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Family caregiver is defined as the person who is primarily responsible for the care of the patient and is living together with the patient as one family.

 

Types of intervention(s)

The intervention of interest will be art therapy in any format as described by the primary researchers.

 

This may include but not be limited to creative-arts interventions and art-making classes that are provided by either trained or non-trained personnel.

 

Types of comparator(s)

The comparator will be no therapy or an alternative psychotherapeutic intervention.

 

Types of outcomes

This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measures:

 

1. Anxiety: levels will be measured by Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

 

2. Stress: levels will be measured by salivary cortical, surveys or self-reported data

 

3. Emotional wellbeing: levels will be measured by the Mini Profile of Mood States (Mini-POMS) or the Derogates Affects Balance Scale (DABS).

 

Types of studies

This review will consider any experimental study design including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and before and after studies for inclusion.

 

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by an analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Studies published in all languages will be considered for inclusion in this review subject to availability of translation assistance. Studies published from

 

2003 to 2013 will be considered for inclusion in this review as the review intends to provide most updated evidence.

 

The databases to be searched include:

 

Medline

 

CINAHL

 

Embase

 

Scopus

 

PsycINFO

 

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials

 

The search for unpublished studies will include: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses

 

US National Institutes of Health, clinical trials

 

Initial keywords to be used will be: Art therapy, family caregiver, cancer

 

Assessment of methodological quality

Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

 

Data collection

Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.

 

Data synthesis

Quantitative data will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square. Where statistical pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate. Subgroup analysis may be performed to examine whether specific patient characteristics modify the effects of the intervention.

 

Conflicts of interest

The reviewers declare no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

1. Marcus Lewis F. Strengthening family supports. Cancer and the family. Cancer. 1990;65(S3):752-9. [Context Link]

 

2. Weitzner MA, Jacobsen PB, Wagner H, Jr, Friedland J, Cox C. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1-2):55-63. [Context Link]

 

3. Arno PS, Levine C, Memmott MM. The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Affairs. 1999;18(2):182-8. [Context Link]

 

4. Gibson MJ, Houser A. Valuing the invaluable: a new look at the economic value of family caregiving. In: AARP Public Policy Institute, editor. Washington 2007. p. 1-12. [Context Link]

 

5. Mosher CE, Bakas T, Champion VL. Physical health, mental health, and life changes among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Jan 1;40(1):53-61. [Context Link]

 

6. Bakas T, Lewis RR, Parsons JE. Caregiving tasks among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Jun;28(5):847-54. [Context Link]

 

7. Northouse L, Williams AL, Given B, McCorkle R. Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1227-34. [Context Link]

 

8. Cameron JI, Franche RL, Cheung AM, Stewart DE. Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer. 2002;94(2):521-7. [Context Link]

 

9. Wood MJM, Molassiotis A, Payne S. What research evidence is there for the use of art therapy in the management of symptoms in adults with cancer? A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. 2011;20(2):135-45. [Context Link]

 

10. Walsh SM, Martin SC, Schmidt LA. Testing the Efficacy of a Creative - Arts Intervention With Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2004;36(3):214-9. [Context Link]

 

11. Walsh SM, Weiss S, editors. Art intervention with family caregivers and patients with cancer. Oncology nursing forum; 2003: Onc Nurs Society. [Context Link]

 

12. Walsh SM, Radcliffe RS, Castillo LC, Kumar AM, Broschard DM, editors. A pilot study to test the effects of art-making classes for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Oncology nursing forum; 2007: Onc Nurs Society. [Context Link]

Appendix I: Appraisal instruments

 

MAStARI appraisal instrument[Context Link]

Appendix II: Data extraction instruments

 

MAStARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]

 

Keywords: Art therapy; family caregiver; cancer