Inclusion criteria
Types of participants
This review will consider studies that include postoperative cardiothoracic surgery adult patients over the age of 18 years of age including those that have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery, valve replacement surgery, ascending thoracic aorta repair, and/or ventricular septal defect repair. Exclusion criteria include mechanical ventilation and unstable hemodynamic status (CI<2.0 L/min/2).
Types of intervention(s)
This review will consider studies that evaluate bed position versus chair position in measuring cardiac index. In bed position includes head of bed elevation between 0 and 45 degrees (CI index can be accurately measured and trended with head of bed elevated to 45 degrees as long as zeroing stopcock is properly leveled to the phlebostatic axis and patient is in supine position.) A chair position includes a sitting position, and an out-of-bed position in a non-reclining, straight-back chair in the upright position with knees bent and feet on the floor, with patients allowed to rest for at least 10 minutes before CI is measured to allow for physiological equilibrium.
Types of outcomes
The primary outcome of interest for the review is the reliability and validity of cardiac index in bed position versus chair position. Secondary outcomes of interest include: cardiac output, pulmonary artery occlusive pressure, stroke volume, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery pressure systolic and pulmonary artery pressure diastolic measurement.
Types of studies
This quantitative review will examine studies with the highest level of evidence including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other experimental study designs. Non-experimental studies, method comparison, correlational, cross-sectional, and descriptive studies will also be considered.
Search strategy
The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title, abstract, and of the index terms used to describe articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Studies published in the English language will be considered for inclusion in this review. Studies published between 1960 to current will be considered for inclusion in this review.
The databases to be searched will include:
CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and EMBASE
The search for unpublished studies will include:
Proquest Dissertations and Theses and Mednar
Initial keywords to be used will be cardiac index, chair sitting, bed position, hemodynamic monitoring, venous return, and postoperative cardiothoracic adults.
Assessment of methodological quality
Quantitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.
Data collection
Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.
Data synthesis
Quantitative data will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square and also explored using subgroup analyses based on the different study designs included in this review. Where statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
Mary Marix M.L.S. AHIP & Marsha Bennett DNS, APRN, ACRN
References