Authors

  1. Tartavoulle, Todd DNS(c), CNS-BC
  2. Manning, Jennifer DNS(c), CNS-BC
  3. Fowler, Leanne H. MSN, MBA, RN, CCRN

Abstract

Review question/objective: The objective is to systematically review the best available evidence to determine the reliability and validity of cardiac index (CI) in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) adult patients in bed position versus chair position. The research question used for the systematic review will be: "What is the effect of bed position in comparison with chair position on reliability and validity of cardiac index in the adult patient post cardiothoracic surgery?"

 

Background: Invasive hemodynamic monitoring has evolved over the past 30 years into an everyday practice of the measurement of cardiac specific vital signs in critical care environments. The pulmonary artery catheter, introduced in 1970, measures the hemodynamic parameter of CI. Measuring CI is a common nursing practice in hemodynamic monitoring of postoperative CTS patients.1 CI is an extremely important measurement in the immediate postoperative period for the maintenance of oxygenation and hemodynamic stability. The parameter is a body surface area specific measure of the amount of blood ejected from the left ventricle in one minute. CI is a product of heart rate and stroke volume (the amount of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each contraction). Stroke volume is influenced by preload (volume of blood in ventricle at end of diastole), afterload (ventricular wall tension during systolic ejection), and contractility (the ability of heart muscle to contract and distend).2 The normal range of CI is 2.2-4.0 L/min/2 and is variable over a 24 hour period peaking during activity and decreasing during sleep. CI is a primary determinant of end organ perfusion and oxygen delivery to the tissues.3 One of the key indices of adequate CI is the ability of the cardiovascular system to meet the metabolic demands of the tissues. Venous oxygen saturation, which provides an assessment of the amount of oxygen extracted by the tissues, is the percentage of hemoglobin saturation in the central venous circulation. The oxygen saturation of mixed venous blood provides a global picture of oxygen delivery and consumption of the metabolic needs of the various organs and tissues. CI, hemoglobin, and arterial oxygen saturation affect venous oxygen saturation.2 Morbidity and mortality is directly related to the delivery of oxygen to the tissues. Oxygen deprivation to the tissues results in higher morbidity and mortality rates in postoperative CTS adult patients.1

 

To ensure accuracy of CI readings, three major components are necessary: (1) patient positioning, (2) leveling the transducer (air-fluid interface) to the phlebostatic axis (external anatomical reference point), and (3) zeroing the transducer. Traditionally CI has been measured in patients while in supine position as most patients report more comfort with head of bed (HOB) elevated; and because HOB elevation is a key factor in the prevention of complications such as ventilator associated pneumonia. Research demonstrates accurate measurement of CI can be performed up to 45 degree HOB elevation. The practice has evolved from supine measurement of CI to 45 degree HOB elevation measurement of CI and must include a properly leveled and calibrated (zeroed) transducer.4 The accuracy of measurement is unknown when patients are in positions other than flat and supine.5

 

The phlebostatic axis is used as a baseline for consistent transducer height placement. The phlebostatic axis is located by identifying the fourth intercostal space at the midaxillary line. The axis approximates the level of the atria. Maintaining the transducer at the level of the axis allows for accurate changes in hydrostatic pressure in blood vessels above and below the level of the heart. Variations in the height of the transducer system by a little as one centimeter above or below the phlebostatic axis results in false readings of CI. Thus when the position of the patient changes, the nurse must re-level the transducer to maintain accurate measurements of CI.6

 

Calibrating the equipment to atmospheric pressure, referred to as zeroing the transducer, is the third component for accurate CI measurement. Atmospheric pressure exerts a force of 760 mmHg on any object on the earth's surface. A three-way stopcock nearest to the transducer is opened to air (atmospheric pressure) to eliminate the effects of atmospheric pressure on CI. The scale on the monitor is then zeroed to equal atmospheric pressure. Zero referencing is done upon insertion of pulmonary artery catheter, at beginning of each shift, when patient is moved, or when significant changes in hemodynamic status occur.4

 

Current standards of care on postoperative day one for CTS adult patients include transferring the patient out of bed to a chair to prevent post-surgical complications. When patients are placed in an upright position, there is a reflexive increase in total vascular pressure due to a decrease in pressure on the carotid baroreceptor.7 Carotid baroreceptors are sensitive to stretch and pressure and are located at the bifurcation of the common carotid artery and aortic arch. Impulses originating in baroreceptors project impulses to the nucleus of tractus solitaries (vasomotor center in the medulla). When a patient goes from a bed to a chair position the distribution of blood volume changes. Consequently, a reduction in CI and blood pressure triggers the baroreceptors to increase the heart rate to maintain blood pressure and CI. Additionally throughout patient position changes, baroreceptors maintain a constant mean arterial pressure (MAP) to maintain perfusion to vital organs. The ability of such compensatory mechanisms to maintain MAP is dependent upon the capacity of the heart and vascular system to function properly.2 Sitting in a bedside position will cause increased extremity dependency and knee and hip flexion possibly creating differences in blood flow, venous return and/or CI. When patients can tolerate the hemodynamic changes of chair sitting, postoperative CTS guidelines recommend implementing the activity early (postoperative day one). However, reliability and validity of measuring CI versus chair sitting position remains unclear in the practice setting. Moving from an early out-of-bed to a chair sitting position is important in the postoperative CTS adult population: however, reliability and validity of measuring CI in a bed position versus a chair sitting position remains unclear in the practice setting.8

 

The significance of measuring CI for the critical care clinician is to facilitate the physical exam and decision-making process for a treatment plan. Therefore, accuracy of the measure is vital for hemodynamic management of a critically ill or postoperative CTS adult patient.2 Postoperative CTS adult patients are generally in need of postoperative cardiovascular support due to a low CI resulting from preexisting heart disease, prolonged intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass pump use, inadequate myocardial protection, or some combination of these factors. CI can be increased by correcting heart rate, preload, and afterload. Failure to raise CI greater than 2.2 L/min/2 results in a decrease in delivery of oxygen to the tissues and organs thereby increasing morbidity and mortality.6 The purpose of the systematic review is to identify the best available evidence to determine the reliability and validity of CI in postoperative CTS surgery adult patients in bed versus chair position. An initial search of the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, Prospero, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Library did not locate any systematic reviews on this topic.

 

Article Content

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

This review will consider studies that include postoperative cardiothoracic surgery adult patients over the age of 18 years of age including those that have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery, valve replacement surgery, ascending thoracic aorta repair, and/or ventricular septal defect repair. Exclusion criteria include mechanical ventilation and unstable hemodynamic status (CI<2.0 L/min/2).

 

Types of intervention(s)

This review will consider studies that evaluate bed position versus chair position in measuring cardiac index. In bed position includes head of bed elevation between 0 and 45 degrees (CI index can be accurately measured and trended with head of bed elevated to 45 degrees as long as zeroing stopcock is properly leveled to the phlebostatic axis and patient is in supine position.) A chair position includes a sitting position, and an out-of-bed position in a non-reclining, straight-back chair in the upright position with knees bent and feet on the floor, with patients allowed to rest for at least 10 minutes before CI is measured to allow for physiological equilibrium.

 

Types of outcomes

The primary outcome of interest for the review is the reliability and validity of cardiac index in bed position versus chair position. Secondary outcomes of interest include: cardiac output, pulmonary artery occlusive pressure, stroke volume, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery pressure systolic and pulmonary artery pressure diastolic measurement.

 

Types of studies

This quantitative review will examine studies with the highest level of evidence including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other experimental study designs. Non-experimental studies, method comparison, correlational, cross-sectional, and descriptive studies will also be considered.

 

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title, abstract, and of the index terms used to describe articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Studies published in the English language will be considered for inclusion in this review. Studies published between 1960 to current will be considered for inclusion in this review.

 

The databases to be searched will include:

 

CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and EMBASE

 

The search for unpublished studies will include:

 

Proquest Dissertations and Theses and Mednar

 

Initial keywords to be used will be cardiac index, chair sitting, bed position, hemodynamic monitoring, venous return, and postoperative cardiothoracic adults.

 

Assessment of methodological quality

Quantitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

 

Data collection

Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.

 

Data synthesis

Quantitative data will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square and also explored using subgroup analyses based on the different study designs included in this review. Where statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate.

 

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

Acknowledgements

Mary Marix M.L.S. AHIP & Marsha Bennett DNS, APRN, ACRN

 

References

 

1. Morton P, Fontaine D. Critical care nursing: a holistic approach. Philadelphia; 2009. [Context Link]

 

2. Sole M, Klein D, Moseley M. Introduction to critical care nursing. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013. [Context Link]

 

3. Guiliano K, Scott S, Brown V, Olson M. Backrest angle and cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients. Nursing Research 2003; 52(4): 242-248. [Context Link]

 

4. Urden L, Stacey K, Lough M. Critical care nursing: Diagnosis and management. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. [Context Link]

 

5. Driscoll A, Shanahan A, Crommy L, Gleeson A. The effect of patient position on the reproducibility of cardiac output measurements. Heart and Lung 1995;24:38-44. [Context Link]

 

6. Carlson K. Advanced critical care nursing. St. Louis; 2009. [Context Link]

 

7. Ogoh S, Fadel P, Nissen P, Jans O, Selmer C, Secher N, Raven P. Baroreflex-mediated changes in cardiac output and vascular conductance in response to alterations in carotid sinus pressure during exercise in humans. Journal of Physiology 2013;550(Pt 1): 317-324. [Context Link]

 

8. Rader C, Nelson M, Sobek C, Smith M, Garcia R, Wright S, Moutray K, Shrum S, Richards N. Cardiac index based on measurements obtained in a bedside chair and in bed. American Journal of Critical Care 2011;20(3): 210-215. [Context Link]

Appendix I: Appraisal instruments

 

MAStARI appraisal instruments[Context Link]

Appendix II: Data extraction instruments

 

MAStARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]

 

Keywords: cardiac index; chair sitting; bed position; hemodynamic monitoring; venous return; and postoperative cardiothoracic adults.