Authors
- Rittenmeyer, Leslie PsyD, RN, CNE
Abstract
Review question/objective: This systematic review seeks to:
Identify and synthesize the best available international evidence on how patients and families experience waiting while engaged with the healthcare system.
The specific purpose of this review is to systematically examine the scientific literature in order to identify the phenomenon of waiting in the context of healthcare. To this end the questions addressed in this review are:
1. What are the different types of waiting that occur when patients and families engage healthcare delivery systems?
2. How do patients and families describe the experience of waiting while engaging with the healthcare delivery system?
3. What emotions are expressed as a result of having to wait while engaging the healthcare system?
4. What is the experience of being on a 'wait list' to receive healthcare services?
Background: "Let's go." "We can't." "Why not?" "We're waiting for Godot."1 Through the eyes of Samuel Beckett's protagonists readers understand that waiting can sometimes become intolerable. Tanner (2002) philosophically examined medical waiting rooms within the context of contemporary American fiction and stated "the medical waiting room is marked by literal and symbolic assaults on autonomy."2(p.117) In a study on waiting in a critical care waiting room, Bournes and Mitchell identified the essences and structures of the experience of waiting. They shared the voice of one of their participants. "I just sat there, wondering and worrying, what was taking so long and when they were going to call me to go back and visit." "The night waiting is completely different than the day because its dark and quieter[horizontal ellipsis]you start to think the worse."3(p.60) Plowfield studied family experiences of waiting following neurological crisis of a loved one. The author found that the experiences of the participants in the initial phase of the crisis were divided into two themes, uncertainty and searching for meaning. Uncertainty included an altered sense of time, feeling of loss of control and a stress response. There was a common observation of the family participants in this study that there was a discrepancy between the meaning of time for the staff and the meaning of time for the family. In searching for meaning, the families had to learn the rules, find ways to gain control and find hope that there would be a good outcome.4 In a grounded theory study, vanDreven generated a theory on the experience of relatives waiting for news of a critically ill loved one. Four themes emerged: mothering, trust, flustered anxiety and institutional and medical power. The authors posited that there is a balancing of both positive and negative for the four themes. For instance, being asked to entrust the care of a loved one to a stranger, countered by feeling relieved to entrust the care to a professional. If the balance tips in favor of the negative, a harmful impact on the family's feelings of wellbeing can result.5
Thorne, Harris, Hislop and Vestrup studied the experience of waiting for diagnosis after an abnormal mammogram. They identified conceptual themes through a series of focus group interviews and grounded inductive analysis. The participant's accounts revealed the different ways in which women experienced time, their individual and common responses to waiting and the impact of health system factors.6 Regardless of outcome, waiting for a definitive diagnosis is often an emotional and sometimes agonizing experience for both patients and families.6-12 Thuczek, Kosik, Farrell and Rock studied how parents of infants who had abnormal results in cystic fibrosis newborn screening were affected psychologically. They concluded that waiting for notification of the screening results to diagnosis can be very psychologically distressing, causing depressive symptoms that vary depending on the parents' perception about the likelihood that their child has the disease.13 Portnoy conducted a study that examined how bracing for the results of a medical test may be psychologically distressing, but further has the potential to affect cognitive processing. Results from this study indicated that anticipating a possible negative test result increased cognitive distraction in the processing of information and consequently decreased recall ability of important information.14 Baily, Wallace and Mishel studied older men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who made a decision to do 'watchful waiting' as an alternative to treatment. For some participants, the selection of 'watchful waiting' caused considerable distress; for others it allowed men to be in denial; because they didn't feel ill yet many recalled the emotional toll of living with the uncertainity.15 Mulcahy, Parry and Glover talk about the trauma of waiting and write "People who go through the medical system as a cancer patient learn one important lesson: the good patient is a patient patient. Waiting it would seem is a rite of passage for the cancer patient. The cancer experience is akin to sitting endlessly in a waiting room, where the patient is powerless to do anything but watch the clock."16(p.1062)
In a concept analysis of waiting for healthcare, Fogarty and Cronin identified the critical attributes of the concept as "a period of measured time, subjective interpretation of the perceived significance of measured time, feeling uncertain and powerless and anticipation of a response to the healthcare need."17(p.462) To this point, Sjoling, Agren, Olofsson, Hellzen and Asplund explored the experience of being on a waiting list for arthoplastic surgery, which caused the participants various forms of suffering. Some of the findings identified in this study were: no man's land; waiting to return to a normal life; a life on hold-a continuous struggle against a faceless system; living an undignified, meaningless life due to pain and disability; caring needs met; establishing a trusting relationship with a health care representative.18 Redko, Rapp and Carlson suggest that waiting time is a common barrier to substance abuse treatment. In a study that looked at the perceptions of substance users on treatment entry, they found that participants voiced that being on a waiting list caused some to give up on treatment and keep using, while there were others who maintained sobriety while waiting but used it as proof that they did not need treatment.19 Locsin and Martua studied waiting in the context of persons who had been exposed to Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever who had not yet developed signs and symptoms. The themes that emerged from this phenomenological study were helplessness in anticipation and fear of dying; premature death; agonizing over losing relatives, friends and loved one's; trusting no one; and helplessness and hopelessness.20
There is ample evidence to suggest that the concept of waiting in the context of healthcare delivery is a phenomenon of interest to healthcare practitioners. This review will synthesize the best available evidence in order to increase understanding of the concept and make recommendations for practice. A preliminary search of the Joanna Briggs Library, CINAHL and PubMed has revealed that there is currently not a systematic review (either published or ongoing) on this topic.
Article Content
Inclusion criteria
Types of participants
Patients, family members and/or significant others of any age who experience the phenomenon of waiting in the context of the healthcare system. Healthcare system is defined as any location where healthcare services are delivered. Persons waiting for organ transplants will be excluded. The diagnostic strategy of watchful waiting will likewise be excluded. These topics will be addressed in separate reviews.
Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest
The phenomenon of interest is the experiences of patients and families who must wait for something as a result of engaging the healthcare system. Through this review an attempt will be made to differentiate the different types of waiting, explain the differences in how patients and families perceive the meaning of waiting, describe how people describe their emotions as a result of waiting and explicate the meaning of the experience of being placed on a waiting list to receive healthcare services.
Context
Healthcare system which is defined as any location where healthcare services are delivered.
Types of studies
This review will consider studies that focus on qualitative data including but not limited to designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, critical theory and discourse analysis.
Search Strategy
The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished English language primary research studies. There is no restriction of dates because it is unclear when the earliest research on this topic was available. Assessment for inclusion of foreign language publications will be based on the English language abstract, and if considered appropriate and feasible, an English language translation would be sought.
A three-step search strategy will be utilized in each component of this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken, followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was then undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles will be hand searched for additional studies.
The electronic data bases to be searched include:
* CINAHL
* Conference Proceedings
* Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition
* Elsevier Science Direct
* Institute for Health & Social Care Research (IHSCR)
* New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report
* ProQuest Digitl Dissertations
* Psych ARTICLES
* PsychINFO
* PubMed (MEDLINE)
* Reference lists of identified studies and review papers
* SCOPUS
* Sociological Abstracts
Initial Key Words
Wait* and experience or lived experience or meaning* or waiting n3 room* or waiting n3 die or surgery or treatment or procedure or cancer or appointment or waiting n3 know.
Assessment of methodological quality
Qualitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.
Data collection
Qualitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.
Data synthesis
Qualitative research findings will, where possible, be pooled using JBI-QARI. This will involve the aggregation or synthesis of findings to generate a set of statements that represent that aggregation through assembling the findings (Level 1 findings) rated according to their quality, and categorizing these findings on the basis of similarity in meaning (Level 2 findings). These categories will then be subjected to a meta-synthesis in order to produce a single comprehensive set of synthesized findings (Level 3 findings) that can be used as a basis for evidence based practice. Where textual pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form.
Conflicts of interest
None to declare
References
1. Beckett, S. Waiting for Godot: a tragicomedy in two acts. 1953. [Context Link]
2. Tanner, LE. Bodies in waiting: representations of medical waiting rooms in contemporary American fiction. American Literary History. 2002 [Context Link]
3. Bournes D, Mitchell G. Waiting: the experience of persons in a critical care waiting room. Research in Nurs & Health. 2002;25(1):58-67. [Context Link]
4. Plowfield LA. Living a nightmare: family experiences of waiting following neurological crisis. J Neurosci Nurs.1999;31 (4):231-238. [Context Link]
5. vanDreven A. Waiting: a critical experience. Thesis Australian Catholic University. 2001. [Context Link]
6. Thorne S, Harris S, Hislop T, Vestrup J. The experience of waiting for diagnosis after an abnormal mammogram. Breast J.1999;5 (1):42-51. [Context Link]
7. Baum M. Benign breast disease: the cost of the service and the cost to the patient. World J Surg.1989;13 (6):669-673. [Context Link]
8. Barrere C. Breast biopsy support program: a collaboration between the oncology clinical nurse specialist and the ambulatory surgery nurse. Oncology Nurs For. 1992;19(9): 1375-1379. [Context Link]
9. Leinster S. How do I do it-breast cancer: the psychological management of the patient with early breast cancer. Euro J Surg Onc.1994;20(6):711-714. [Context Link]
10. Paisson MB, Norberg A. Breast cancer patients' experience of nursing care with the focus on emotional support: the implementation of a nursing intervention. J Adv Nurs.1995;21(2):277-285. [Context Link]
11. Poole, C. The emergence of the waiting game: a critical examination of the psychosocial issues in diagnosing breast cancer. J of Adv Nurs.1997;25(2):273-281. [Context Link]
12. Northhouse L. The impact of breast cancer on patients and husbands. Cancer Nurs.1989; 12(5):276-284. [Context Link]
13. Tluczek A, Koscik R, Farrell P, Rock M. Psychosocial risk associated with newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents experience while awaiting the sweat-test appointment. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1692-1703. [Context Link]
14. Portnoy D. Waiting is the hardest part: anticipating medical test results affects processing and recall of important information. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(2):421-427. [Context Link]
15. Baily D, Wallace M, Mishel M. Watching, waiting and uncertainty in prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs.2007;16(4):734-741. [Context Link]
16. Mulcahy C, Parry D, Glover T. The 'patient patient ': the trauma of waiting and the power of resistance for people living with cancer. Qual Health Resea. 2010;20(8): 1062-1075. [Context Link]
17. Fogarty C, Cronin P. Waiting for healthcare: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(4):463-471. [Context Link]
18. Sjoling M, Agren Y, Olofsson N, Hellzen O, Asplund K. Waiting for surgery: living a life on hold-a continuous struggle against a faceless system. Inter J Nurs Stud. 2005;42(5):539-547. [Context Link]
19. Redko C, Rapp R, Carlson R. Waiting time as a barrier to treatment entry: perceptions of substance users. J Drug Issues. 2006;04(4):831-852. [Context Link]
20. Locsin R, Matua A. the lived experience of waiting to know: Ebola at Mbarara, Uganda-hoping for life, anticipating death. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37(2): 173-181. [Context Link]
Appendix I: Appraisal instruments
QARI appraisal instrument[Context Link]
Appendix II: Data extraction instruments
QARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]
Keywords: waiting; experience; healthcare