Authors

  1. Haatainen, Kaisa PhD
  2. Tervo-Heikkinen, Tarja PhD
  3. Saranto, Kaija DSc.

Abstract

Review question/objective: The objective of this review is to critically appraise and synthesize the best available evidence based on primary studies exploring adult patients' experiences of discharge education in an emergency department in order to address the following question: "What are the experiences of adult patients' related to their discharge education from the emergency department?"

 

Background: Discharging patients from the hospital is a complex process with many challenges. When patient discharge is well planned and timed, the quality of life for the patient may be improved, as well as the financial well-being of healthcare systems.1,2 The number of emergency department (ED) visits is already high and growing. For instance in the US, 19.6% of adults (aged 18 years and over) in 1997 and 20.3% of adults in 2011 had one or more ED visits within the past 12 months, and 6.7% in 1997 and 7.3% in 2011 in the same age group had two or more visits.3

 

Patient turnover in the ED is rapid so the time for patient education per patient can be extremely short. However, a patient always needs to receive adequate guidance so that he or she understands and is able to follow the doctor's and nurse's advice to handle their illness or condition at home.4 Comprehensive discharge instructions are necessary to ensure a smooth transition from hospital to home, as the responsibility for care shifts from healthcare providers to the patient and caregivers. Unfortunately, patients often go home without understanding critical information about their hospital stay, such as their discharge diagnosis or medication changes5, leaving them both dissatisfied with their discharge instructions6 and at risk for hospital readmission.7 Patient education is the process of informing a patient about a health matter to secure informed consent, patient cooperation and a high level of patient compliance.8 Some studies have raised the need for standardized discharge education for patients in different disease groups in the ED, such as patients with head-injuries or asthma.9,10

 

Discharge planning means the development of an individualized discharge plan for the patient prior to leaving the hospital, to ensure that patients are discharged at an appropriate time and with provision of adequate post-discharge services. At the time of discharge, the patient should be provided with a document that includes language and literacy-appropriate instructions and patient education materials to help in successful transition from the hospital. These documents should be brief, focusing on critical information relevant to the patient and primarily directed at what the patient needs to understand to manage his/her condition after discharge.11

 

Many studies have shown that patient education needs are different in older age and older citizens and that their relatives need more time and effort from care providers to support the older patients' coping at home.12,13,14 Patient education faces new challenges as the relative proportion of older people and patients increases.13

 

A patient with sufficient information about their condition and with solid patient education has good possibilities to participate in his or her own care.15 Patient education benefits can be seen in 1) increasing the patient's ability to cope with and manage his/her health; 2) facilitating patients' and families' understanding of their health status, options and consequences of care; 3) empowering patients in decision making; 4) increasing patients' potential to follow the healthcare plan; 5) helping patients' learn behaviors, promoting recovery and improving function; 6) increasing patient confidence in his/her self-care; and 7) decreasing treatment complications.15 Besides valuable benefits to the patient, healthcare organizations that provide targeted and appropriate patient and family education can reap benefits. Patient education can increase customer satisfaction, improve compliance with regulatory standards and efficiency through cost-effective care and also leads to better informed patients, thus lessening the chance of malpractice claims.15

 

In addition, relatives need regular informing and education to be able to act as caregivers after discharge. They can be too shy to ask for advice or more anxious than the patient themself.16 Staff should ensure that there are no unclear issues, for example regarding medication instructions or limitations on dietary and physical exercise, for a patient when leaving the ED.17

 

Several systematic reviews on patient education will be published in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Cochrane databases in the near future. Fredericks and Yau will review studies which concentrate on the educational interventions for adults to prevent readmission and complications following cardiovascular surgery.18 The others will review the effectiveness of discharge interventions19, structured discharge process20 and patient-caregiver dyad discharge interventions.21 This systematic review, however, will concentrate on adult patients' experiences of discharge education in the ED. Discharge education refers to written or verbal education that the patient has received prior to discharge.

 

Article Content

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

This review will consider studies that include adult patients aged 18 years and over in an ED. Patients discharged from the ED to another unit in the same hospital, another hospital or clinic, hospice or nursing home will be excluded.

 

Phenomena of interest

The review will consider studies that explore adult patients' experiences of discharge education (written or verbal) provided when leaving the ED to go home.

 

Context

The context will be the ED.

 

Types of studies

This review will consider studies that used qualitative designs and draw on adult patients' experiences of discharge education provided in an ED. The studies will include qualitative research study designs. In the absence of these, expert opinion papers, discussion papers and policy documents will be included.

 

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial search of CINAHL and PubMed will be undertaken to identify any relevant key words contained in the title, abstract or subject descriptors, including MeSH terms. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Studies published in Finnish, English and Swedish until 2014 will be considered for inclusion in this review.

 

The databases to be searched include:

 

1. CINAHL

 

2. Cochrane Library

 

3. LINDA

 

4. Medic

 

5. PubMed

 

 

The search for unpublished studies will include:

 

Grey literature in the form of conference materials, academic dissertations and documents on internet pages of the National Institute for Health and Welfare, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, WHO, ICN, AHRQ, IHI, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Open Library, etc., that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Reference lists and bibliographies of articles collected from those identified in the above process will also be searched for eligible studies.

 

Limitations:

 

The search will be limited to:

 

- age: adult patients aged 18 years and over

 

- education: written or verbal education patients received before discharge

 

 

Initial keywords to be used in this review will be:

 

* paivysty* ensia* ensihoi* emergency department AND potila* patient* AND tieto* tiedo* information education counsel* potilastie* potilasopa* instruction*

 

* emergency medical services (MesH) OR emergency service, hospital (MesH) OR emergency medical tags (MesH) OR emergency medicine (MesH)

 

* [medical records systems, computerized (MesH) OR patient education handout] OR [hospital information systems (MesH) OR consumer health information (MesH)]

 

Assessment of methodological quality

Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed independently by two reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

 

Data collection

Qualitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the phenomena of interest, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.

 

Data synthesis

Qualitative research findings will, where possible, be pooled using JBI-QARI. This will involve the aggregation or synthesis of findings to generate a set of statements that represent that aggregation, through assembling the findings rated according to their quality and categorizing these findings on the basis of similarity in meaning. These categories are then subjected to a meta-synthesis in order to produce a single comprehensive set of synthesized findings that can be used as a basis for evidence-based practice. Where textual pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form.

 

Conflicts of interest

None.

 

References

 

1. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting Effective Transitions of Care at Hospital Discharge: A Review of Key Issues for Hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007; 2(5):314-323. [Context Link]

 

2. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Public Reporting of Discharge Planning and Rates of Readmissions. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(27):2637-45. [Context Link]

 

3. Percent of adults with emergency department visits in the past 12 months according to selected characteristics, Health, United States, 2012, table 86. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus12.pdf#086 (7.3.2014) [Context Link]

 

4. Spandorfer JM, Karras DJ, Hughes LA, Caputo C. Comprehension of discharge instructions by patients in an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25(1): 71-74. [Context Link]

 

5. AshbrookL, Mourad M, Sehgal N. Communicating Discharge Instructions to Patients: A Survey of Nurse, Intern, and Hospitalist Practices. J Hosp Med. 2013; 8(1): 36-41. [Context Link]

 

6. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Patients' Perception of Hospital Care in the United States. 2008. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(18):1921-31. [Context Link]

 

7. Ginde AA, Pallin DJ, Camargo CA Jr. Hospitalization and Discharge Education of Emergency Department Patients With Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Educ. 2008; 34(4):683-691. DOI: 10.1177/0145721708321022 [Context Link]

 

8. http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/patient+education (7.3.2014) [Context Link]

 

9. Kerr J, Swann IJ, Pentland B. A survey of information given to head-injured patients on direct discharge from emergency departments in Scotland. Emerg Med J. 2007; 24(5): 330-332. [Context Link]

 

10. Gervais P, Larouche I, Blais L, Fillion A, Beauchesne MF. Asthma management at discharge from the emergency department: a descriptive study. Can Respir J. 2005; 12(4): 219-222. [Context Link]

 

11. Alper E, O'Malley TA, Greenwald J. Hospital Discharge. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/hospital-discharge#H20 (18.6.2013) [Context Link]

 

12. Brown D. Perceptions of discharge instructions by the ED patient. Commun Nurs Res. 2006; (39): 393. [Context Link]

 

13. Laapotti-SaloA, Routasalo P. Iakkaan potilaan tieto omasta sairaudestaan, hoidostaan ja kotiutussuunnitelmastaan. Tutkiva hoitotyo. 2004; 2(1): 23-28. English summary. [Context Link]

 

14. Virtanen P, Paavilainen E, Helminen M, astedt-Kurki P. Aivoverenkiertohairiopotilaan tiedonsaanti ensiapupoliklinikalla. Hoitotiede. 2010; 22(4): 302-311. English abstract. [Context Link]

 

15. http://www.patient-education.com/main.asp?p=aboutus&s=bope&fs=aboutus&mode=FULL (7.3.2014) [Context Link]

 

16. Virtanen P, Paavilainen E, Helminen M, astedt-Kurki P. Aivoverenkiertohairiopotilaan laheisen tiedonsaanti ensiapupoliklinikalla. Suom Laakaril. 2011; 66(11): 915-919. http://www.fimnet.fi/cgi-cug/brs/artikkeli.cgi?docn=000035487 (7.3.2014) [Context Link]

 

17. Salminen-Tuomaala M, Kaappola A, Kurikka S, Leikkola P, Vanninen J, Paavilainen E. Patients' perceptions of counselling and written home care instructions at the emergency department. Tutkiva Hoitotyo. 2010; 8 (4): 21-28. [Context Link]

 

18. Fredericks S, Yau TM. Educational interventions for adults to prevent readmission and complications following cardiovascular surgery (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD010121. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010121. [Context Link]

 

19. Braet A, Weltens C, Vleugels A. Effectiveness of discharge interventions from hospital to home to reduce readmissions: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic reviews. 2012; 10(28):S105-S117. [Context Link]

 

20. Domingo G, Johnson P, Reyes F, Thompson F, Shortridge-Baggett L. Effectiveness of structured discharge process in reducing hospital readmission of adult patients with community acquired pneumonia: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews. 2012; 10(18):1086-1121. [Context Link]

 

21. Mcleod-Sordjan R. Effectiveness of patient-caregiver dyad discharge interventions on hospital readmissions of elderly patients with community acquired pneumonia: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews. 2011; 9(14):437-463. [Context Link]

Appendix I: Appraisal instruments

 

QARI appraisal instrument[Context Link]

Appendix II: Data extraction instruments

 

QARI data extractioninstrument[Context Link]

 

Keywords: emergency department; emergency medical services; medical records systems