Authors

  1. Rasmussen, Birgit MHH
  2. Uhrenfeldt, Lisbeth RN, MScN, PhD

Abstract

Review question/objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the lived experiences of self-efficacy and well-being the first year after hip fracture.

 

Background: People sustaining a hip fracture are at risk of health impairment and mortality.1, 2 The peak age of people experiencing a hip fracture is between 75 and 80 years and most often hip fractures occur in women.1, 3 Eighty percent of hip fractures are associated with low-impact trauma.4 After hip fracture some experience short or long term disability; some never regain their former level of mobility.5, 6 Bertram et al.5 found that after one year, 35% were unable to walk independently and 29% experienced lifelong disability. The consequence of this can be new dependency in assistance with everyday functioning, e.g. getting in and out of a bath or going shopping. Some suffer a loss in quality of life6-8 and wellbeing8, and some move to nursing home facilities.3, 5, 9

 

For society, it is important to find ways to improve recovery after hip fracture. In 2000, the worldwide disability-adjusted life years lost associated with hip fracture were estimated to be at least 2.53 million.1 The lifetime cost for all hip fractures is estimated to exceed $20 billion in the United States alone.10 Interventions should take into consideration all factors that can affect function after hip fracture11 such as age and comorbidity,7, 12 pre-fracture function, gender, pain, muscle strength, early mobility level11, 13-15, 17 and cognitive14, 16, 17 and effective status.17, 18 Rehabilitation starts immediately after surgery and can take place in a variety of practices: during hospitalization, in an ambulatory setting and after discharge from hospital.19, 20 The effect of rehabilitation after hip fracture is suggested to be less effective if there are restrictions in function from a fear of falling (FOF).21, 22 Fear of falling is linked to self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is the belief persons have about their capability to do a certain task.23, 24

 

After hip fracture, older people reported that their lives were changed physically, personally and socially.25, 26 In a study by Jellemark et al25 the interviewees talked about feeling isolated which lead to loneliness and could result in frustration and helplessness. McMillan et al27, 28 conducted interviews three months after discharge from hospital and found that during hip fracture rehabilitation older people struggled to take control of their future life by trying to balance risk-taking and help-seeking.27, 28 The interviewees were aware that on one hand it could be risky to move around and they were afraid of falling but on the other hand they wanted to be active and were trying to do things. They were determined to regain independency. In order to make progress, some of the interviewees stressed the importance of receiving information and being included in talks regarding their progress.27, 28 Not understanding or not remembering the information received, resulted in feelings of being anxious about what they could or could not do.

 

The lived experience of own mobility after hip fracture may be linked to a fear of falling, and experiences of low self-confidence may affect the degree of mobility and activities carried out in daily life. A self-induced restriction in physical activity after hip fracture rehabilitation can lead to diminished physical function, increase the risk of future falls and affect experiences of wellbeing.21,29,30 It may be important to include strategies to increase confidence in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after hip fracture.21,30-32

 

In a mixed methods study, Jellesmark et al.25 explored the experienced relationship between a fear of falling and functional debility in older people three to six months after hip fracture. The people interviewed applied different strategies to avoid falling. For example, a walker could reduce their fear of falling but it could also be a barrier and make it impossible to take the bus;25 a woman chose to sit in a soft chair where she felt safe, while others chose an active life-style despite the risk of falling; and some were able to walk but had promised their relatives to be careful and this kept them from being active.25

 

An earlier study underlined the traumatic impact of a hip fracture on the lives of older people.33 They experienced fear of falling and dependency. Some perceived their hip fracture to be a chronic problem which affected the improvements they made during rehabilitation.33

 

It is possible to experience feelings of wellbeing after hip fracture. Todres and Galvin34 developed an existential theory of wellbeing where wellbeing is understood as a resource when it comes to eradicating ill health. People live in a world that is relational and full of meanings, where you sense, embody and experience. This intimate togetherness with the world is experienced before any reflection or attitude and is named the life-world. Within the life-world you just know and sense what wellbeing is.34

 

During illness, people experience the limitations of their existential possibilities. Galvin and Todres35 call this an experience of "homelessness".35(p.3)Within homelessness lies the potential experience of striving for homecoming. Striving for homecoming is an energizing flow that holds the possibility of wellbeing. Paradoxically the homecoming holds a possibility of wellbeing in the feeling of acceptance and peace. Galvin and Todres call these dimensions of wellbeing "mobility" and "dwelling".35(p.2) The intertwining unity of dwelling and mobility provides the possibility to experience the deepest form of wellbeing: the space where the rootedness and inner peace of dwelling embraces the energy and mobility of "adventurous horizons".36(p.3)

 

Possible experiences of wellbeing can be considered with an emphasis on different existential qualities: temporality, spatiality, embodiment, intersubjectivity, mood and identity.36 The mobility-experience of personal identity emphasizes identity as "I can" encompassing a sense of "being able to".36(p.8) To a person who has lost confidence in the ability to walk without falling after hip fracture, it can be relevant to ask, what the possibilities are for facilitating self-efficacy in the life of this specific person. To gradually rebuild "I can" successes may become a source of wellbeing.36

 

Well-being may change during rehabilitation after hip fracture. Taylor et al31 in semi-structured interviews investigating mobility levels after hip fracture found that during rehabilitation in hospital, participants reported feeling optimistic.31 However, after discharge from hospital, the picture changed: interviewees were concerned that they had difficulties walking, especially outdoors. One expressed that "[horizontal ellipsis]I get frustrated[horizontal ellipsis] I think if I'm going to be like this the rest of my life I don't want to live".31(p.1288) They reported struggling to cope with daily activities and lack of confidence and resignation were common experiences.31

 

Wellbeing and self-efficacy are resources for both health and illness that can be taken into account when exploring ways to promote possibilities for recovery. The insight is sparse when it comes to understanding what matters to older people after a hip fracture. The findings of this review might provide evidence useful to both health care professionals in their clinical work and to future research. Drawing on the experiences of the elderly with hip fractures can enhance the understanding and awareness of issues that may be important when caring for and developing interventions to improve the functional level, self-efficacy and wellbeing of older people after hip fracture rehabilitation.

 

Article Content

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

This review will consider studies that include people sustaining a hip fracture. Included is any type of hip fracture requiring operation including ostosynthesis and hip arthroplasty. Excluded will be studies where it is not possible to determine which data concern hip fracture.

 

Phenomena of interest

This review will consider studies that investigate lived experiences of existence and limitations of self-efficacy and wellbeing within one year after discharge after hip fracture.

 

Context

This review will consider research in any setting in hospital, during transfers and after discharge from hospital. This study will only consider the results from research dealing with patient experiences after a hip fracture operation has been conducted.

 

Types of studies

This review will consider studies that focus on qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research.

 

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies and a citation search will also be done. Studies published in English, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian will be considered for inclusion in this review.

 

The databases to be searched include:

 

CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE

 

The search for grey literature will include: ProQuest and MEDNAR

 

The search strategy was pilot tested on 10th April 2014 with PubMed database resulting in 148 hits:

 

Assessment of methodological quality

Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

 

Data collection

Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the phenomena of interest, populations and study methods of significance to the review question and specific objectives.

 

Data synthesis

Qualitative research findings will, where possible be pooled using JBI-QARI. This will involve the aggregation or synthesis of findings to generate a set of statements that represent that aggregation, through assembling the findings rated according to their quality, and categorizing these findings on the basis of similarity in meaning. These categories are then subjected to a meta-synthesis in order to produce a single comprehensive set of synthesized findings that can be used as a basis for evidence-based practice. Where textual pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form.

 

Conflicts of interest

None

 

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Research Secretary Line Jensen (MA) Department of Research, Horsens Hospital, Denmark for proofreading and Librarian DB Karin Friis Velbaek, Medical Library, Viborg Regional Hospital in assisting in producing the literature search plan.

 

References

 

1 Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-1733. [Context Link]

 

2 Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 2009 Oct;20(10):1633-1650. [Context Link]

 

3 Melton III LJ. Epidemiology worldwide. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003 Mar;32(1):1-13. [Context Link]

 

4 Bergstrom U, Bjornstig U, Stenlund H, Jonsson H, Svensson O. Fracture mechanisms and fracture pattern in men and women aged 50 years and older: a study of a 12-year population-based injury register, Umeaa, Sweden. Osteoporos Int 2008 Sep;19(9):1267-1273. [Context Link]

 

5 Bertram M, Norman R, Kemp L, Vos T. Review of the long-term disability associated with hip fractures. Inj Prev 2011 Dec;17(6):365-370. [Context Link]

 

6 Boonen S, Autier P, Barette M, Vanderschueren D, Lips P, Haentjens P. Functional outcome and quality of life followinjg hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. Osteoporsois Int 2004 Feb;15(2) : 87-94. [Context Link]

 

7 Roth T, Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Luger TJ, Blauth M. Outcome in geriatric fracture patients and how it can be improved. Osteoporos Int 2010 Dec;21(Suppl 4):S615-9. [Context Link]

 

8 Randell AG, Nguyen TV, Bhalerao N, Silverman SL, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2000;11(5):460-466. [Context Link]

 

9 Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Meyer HE, Falch JA, Nordsletten L, Cappelen I, et al. Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs. Osteoporos Int 2004 Jul;15(7):567-574. [Context Link]

 

10 Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB. Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003 Mar;51(3):364-370. [Context Link]

 

11 Kristensen MT. Factors affecting functional prognosis of patients with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011 Jun;47(2):257-264. [Context Link]

 

12 Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Luger TJ, Blauth M, Roth T. Long-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011 Oct;131(10):1435-1444. [Context Link]

 

13 Chin RP, Ho CH, Cheung LP. Scheduled analgesic regimen improves rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013 Jul;471(7):2349-2360. [Context Link]

 

14 Di Monaco M. Factors affecting functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly. CRIT REV PHYS REHABIL MED 2004 08;16(3):151-176. [Context Link]

 

15 Alegre-Lopez J, Cordero-Guevara J, Alonso-Valdivielso JL, Fernandez-Melon J. Factors associated with mortality and functional disability after hip fracture: an inception cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2005 Jul;16(7):729-736. [Context Link]

 

16 Young Y, Xiong K, Pruzek RM. Longitudinal functional recovery after postacute rehabilitation in older hip fracture patients: the role of cognitive impairment and implications for long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011 Jul;12(6):431-438. [Context Link]

 

17 Hoogerduijn JG, Schuurmans MJ, Duijnstee MS, de Rooij SE, Grypdonck MF. A systematic review of predictors and screening instruments to identify older hospitalized patients at risk for functional decline. J Clin Nurs 2007 Jan;16(1):46-57. [Context Link]

 

18 Mossey JM, Mutran E, Knott K, Craik R. Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors. Am J Public Health 1989 Mar;79(3):279-286. [Context Link]

 

19 Wade DT. Community rehabilitation, or rehabilitation in the community? Disabil Rehabil 2003 08/05;25(15):875-881. [Context Link]

 

20 Chudyk AM, Jutai JW, Petrella RJ, Speechley M. Systematic review of hip fracture rehabilitation practices in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 Feb;90(2):246-262. [Context Link]

 

21 Petrella RJ, Payne M, Myers A, Overend T, Chesworth B. Physical function and fear of falling after hip fracture rehabilitation in the elderly. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000 Mar-Apr;79(2):154-160. [Context Link]

 

22 Visschedijk J, Achterberg W, Van Balen R, Hertogh C. Fear of falling after hip fracture: a systematic review of measurement instruments, prevalence, interventions, and related factors. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58(9):1739-1748 [Context Link]

 

23 Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 2005 Nov;34(6):614-619. [Context Link]

 

24 Bandura A. Self-efficay. In: Weiner EB and Craighead EW, editors. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Vol. 4. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hobuken, New Jersey. 2010. [Context Link]

 

25 Jellesmark A, Herling SF, Egerod I, Beyer N. Fear of falling and changed functional ability following hip fracture among community-dwelling elderly people: An explanatory sequential mixed method study. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal Dec 2012;34(25):2124-2131. 4) Bandura A. 2010. Self-Efficacy. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. 1-3 [Context Link]

 

26 Ziden L, Scherman MH, Wenestam C. The break remains-Elderly people's experiences of a hip fracture 1 year after discharge. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal Jan 2010;32(2):103-113. [Context Link]

 

27 McMillan L, Booth J, Currie K, Howe T. 'Balancing risk' after fall-induced hip fracture: the older person's need for information. Int J Older People Nurs 2013 Apr 24. [Context Link]

 

28 McMillan L, Booth J, Currie K, Howe T. A grounded theory of taking control after fall-induced hip fracture. Disabil Rehabil 2012 2012;34(26):2234-2241. [Context Link]

 

29 Fuzhong L, McAuley E, Fisher KJ, Harmer P, Chaumeton N, Wilson NL. Self-efficacy as a mediator between fear of falling and functional ability in the elderly. J Aging Health 2002 Nov;14(4):452-466. [Context Link]

 

30 Mendes de Leon CF, Seeman TE, Baker DI, Richardson ED, Tinetti ME. Self-efficacy, physical decline, and change in functioning in community-living elders: a prospective study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1996 Jul;51(4):S183-90. [Context Link]

 

31 Taylor NF, Barelli C, Harding KE. Community ambulation before and after hip fracture: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32(15):1281-1290. [Context Link]

 

32 Fortinsky RH, Bohannon RW, Litt MD, Tennen H, Maljanian R, Fifield J, et al. Rehabilitation therapy self-efficacy and functional recovery after hip fracture. Int J Rehabil Res 2002 Sep;25(3):241-246. [Context Link]

 

33 Borkan JM, Quirk M, Sullivan M. Finding meaning after the fall: injury narratives from elderly hip fracture patients. Soc Sci Med 1991;33(8):947-957. [Context Link]

 

34 Todres L, Galvin K, Dahlberg K. Lifeworld-led healthcare: revisiting a humanising philosophy that integrates emerging trends. Med Health Care Philos 2007 Mar;10(1):53-63. [Context Link]

 

35 Todres L, Galvin K. 'Dwelling-mobility': An existential theory of well-being. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2010 Sep 9;5:10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5444 [Context Link]

 

36 Galvin KT, Todres L. Kinds of well-being: A conceptual framework that provides direction for caring. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2011;6(4):10.3402/qhw.v6i4.10362. [Context Link]

Appendix I: Appraisal instruments

 

QARI appraisal instrument[Context Link]

Appendix II: Data extraction instruments

 

QARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]

 

Keywords: hip fracture; rehabilitation; self-efficacy; well-being